ISSN:2321-6212

Department of Physics, Beinstein College of Science, Jalukbari, Guwahati, Assam, India

- *Corresponding Author:
- Hirakjyoti Das

Department of Physics

Beinstein College of Science

Jalukbari, Guwahati, Assam, India

**Tel:**8876345239

**E-mail:**hirakjyot5658@gmail.com

**Received date:** 06/06/2017; **Accepted date:** 04/07/2017; **Published date:** 10/07/2017

DOI: 10.4172/2321-6212.1000176

**Visit for more related articles at** Research & Reviews: Journal of Material Sciences

Studies on heat conduction in nano-dimensional structures have raised numerous interests not only because of geometry dependent thermal transport but also apparently controllable heat dissipation in confined regions including the role of defects and impurity atoms. On reducing the structural size from bulk-to-nanoscale dimension, there will be significant alteration of specific heat capacity. So, thermal conductivity goes different in different temperature regimes approaching to a maximal value at 300 K for carbon nanotubes (CNTs). It may be noted that, unlike electronic contribution to the specific heat capacity, the lattice contribution in a 1D system varies as ~T (as compared to ~T3 trend for a 3D system). Though theoretically and practically thermal conductivity measurements have been carried out for SWCNT but no such theoretical works have been performed for double and triple wall carbon nanotube. We first established the theoretical calculation of thermal conductivity of DWCNT and TWCNT which matches with the experimental observations. The novelty of our work lies with the fact that we first found that as the no of walls increase in CNT from single to double to triple, thermal conductivity values decreases due to van der Waals interaction between the atoms of different walls. We see that thermal conductivity of single-wall CNT is very high (~3500 WmK-1), but it gets reduced to ~700 WmK-1 for a double-wall CNT. This drop is ascribed to incoherent heat dissipation owing significantly to the van der Waals interaction among the atoms of different co-axial walls

Carbon nanotube (CNT), Thermal transport, Carriers, Single-wall Carbon nanotube (SWCNT), Triple wall carbon nanotube (TWCNT), Multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT)

In the application of nano-electronics, nano-mechanics, energy storage devices, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are viewed as the first choice by the researchers and manufacturers [1,2]. Light weight, special electronic structure, high rigidity and high thermal stability could make CNTs an ideal candidate for diverse applications of technological interest [3]. The CNTs come in the form of both single-walled tubes (SWCNTs) as well as multi-walled tubes (MWCNTs). Numerous techniques have widely been employed for synthesizing SWCNTs and MWCNTs. To name a few, are chemical vapor deposition (CVD), metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) and other sophisticated epitaxial methods [3-5]. Although all these methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, however, in general, they are opted for obtaining large scale production of MWCNTs over SWCNTs.

In the past, CNTs have been extensively studied with regard to mechanical, thermal, optoelectronic, photovoltaic aspects. For instance, CNTs have been regularly used as cantilever tip in scanning probe microscopy, especially when, nanoscale defects and voids need to be imaged with absolute precision [6,7]. Owing to bio-conjugation capability and high specificity, the CNTs can also find value in screening and formulation of drugs with high yield. The safe interaction of CNTs with proteins and DNAs have also been demonstrated by various workers in past [8,9].

It may be worth mentioning here that, as the dimension of the devices reduces to nanometer scale, thermal management
becomes increasingly important for improving circuit speed, figure of merit and overall device performance. As an important
observation, the thermal conductivity of SWCNTs (~3500 WmK^{-1}) [10] is drastically suppressed for MWCNTs. In this communication,
we demonstrate heat conduction in SWCNTs and MWCNTs using modified heat diffusion model equations which consider
incoherent heat dissipation but taking into account significant van der Waals interaction among the atoms of different walls.

**Mathematical Analysis**

The usefulness of CNTs is known for displaying exciting mechanical, electronic, thermal and optical properties while targeting on plethora of technological applications. Despite the importance of CNTs are realized in numerous fields, there has been little progress in understanding thermal conduction in CNTs especially while considering the number of walls into account. Here, by employing relevant theoretical treatments we assess thermal response of different MWCNTs with SWCNT as reference.

**Single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT)**

Ideally, CNT is the result of the rolled-up piece of a two-dimensional graphene sheet [11]. To understand the nature of thermal excitations it is important to begin with density of states of (DoS) quantized lattice vibrations (phonons). For a 2D system, the DoS of pfIG honons are given by [12]:

(1)

Where *ω* and *v _{g}* are the angular frequency and group velocity of phonons respectively. One can also define phonon
specific heat capacity,

(2)

Knowing that, *v _{g}* can be expressed in terms of and lattice parameter with

(3)

On the other hand, mean free path length (λ_{i}) of phonons, for 2D SWCNTs is represented by [6]. Here, *M* and *T* represent the mass of a carbon atom and the working temperature respectively. Now, we define thermal conductivity *K*,
for frequencies below the Debye frequency which can be formulated as [6]:

(4)

Where, is the minimum value of arbitrary frequency (for simplicity, *f _{0}*=1 Hz). Thus, in normalized form we write,

(5)

Here, are the normalized thermal conductivity and normalized temperature
(*T*_{300}=300 K) respectively.

*Double-wall carbon nanotubes (DWCNT)*

As can be observed from **Figure 1**, thermal conductivity drops significantly with increase of number of walls. In particular, as
compared to SWCNT, the K value drops by over 60% in case of a DWCNT. Typical value of thermal conductivity for DWCNT is close
to 600 Wm^{-1}K^{-1} [1]. While thermal conductivity of CNTs is determined by the strength of lattice vibration, the reason for a decreasing
trend can be attributed to the van der Waals interaction between the carbon atoms of the adjacent walls. Such an interaction
is believed to exist when the inter-wall spacing is less than 0.7 nm in accordance with the Lenard-Jones potential curve. The
effective van der Waals attraction between the neighboring atoms of the adjacent walls is responsible for suppression of thermal
conductivity measure along the axial direction of the CNT. In order to calculate effective frequency associated with van der Waals
interaction we consider a model figure illustrated in **Figure 1**.

Let us consider two neighboring atoms *A _{1}* and

Referring to **Figure 1**, we write,

(6)

In terms of frequency,

(7)

The value *F* can be determined from the Lenard-Jones formula:

(8)

Where, and

The thermal conductivity of DWCNT is believed to be suppressed by an amount that corresponds to the reduced frequency characterized by equation (7). The resultant thermal conductivity of the DWCNT can now be formulated using equation (3) as,

(9)

*Triple-wall carbon nanotube (TWCNT)*

A TWCNT is composed of three coaxial cylindrical nanotubes with wall spacing of the order of several Å. In a TWCNT, the carbon atoms of the mid-inner wall are largely influenced by atoms of the central and outer wall. In other words, each of the inner wall atoms is equally pulled by neighboring atoms belonging to nearby walls. Consequently, the reduced frequency corresponding to the inner and outer walls is but for middle wall atoms. The resultant reduced frequency responsible for the reduction of thermal conductivity of TWCNT can be given by:

(10)

And the effective thermal conductivity for TWCNT can be stated as,

(11)

In **Figure 2** Line (a) showing the graphical profile of the equation (5), how normalized thermal conductivity varies with
normalized temperature. Line (b) plotted from the empirical data. We can see both Line (a) and Line (b) are almost alike. And
at *T _{0}*=1.4 for the both Line, thermal conductivity has the almost same value. At all temperature the value theoretical thermal
conductivity is always greater than observed value. It is due to the

Again from the **Figure 3** we can see the abrupt decrease in thermal conductivity of DWCNT (n= 2) with respect to the thermal
conductivity of SWCNT (n=1). We see that thermal conductivity of single-wall CNT is very high (~3500 WmK^{-1}), but it gets reduced
to ~700 WmK^{-1} for a double-wall CNT at room temperature [13].

From the 3D **Figures 4** and **5** we can also see that thermal conductivity increase with the length of the nanotube.

From the **Figure 3** it can be concluded that thermal conductivity of CNT decrease with the no of coaxial nanotubes. And it
is also seen that the value of normalized thermal conductivity seem to be almost constant (w.r.t no of nanotubes) as the number
nanotubes increases [14,15].

A number of experimental and theoretical investigations have been focused on the electronic structures of carbon nanotubes in order to understand the origin of their remarkable phenomena. In recent years there are many devices introducing such as CNTs solar cell, CNT superconductor, CNTs as thermoelectric device etc. which are based on thermal properties of CNTs.

Despite the importance there has been little progress in characterizing the thermal conduction in nanotube. In this work we give a new theoretical approach for calculating the thermal conductivity of DWCNT and TWCNT at different temperature. This theoretical value almost fit with the experimental value. In DWCNT and TWCNT thermal conductivity drops down sharply (with respect to the SWCNT), which will help us to calculate and stimulate this in the future for the farther research.

- Aliev AE, et al. Thermal conductivity of multi-walled carbon nanotube sheets: radiation losses and quenching of phonon modes. Nanotechnol 2010;21:035709.
- Baughman RH, et al. Carbon Nanotubes—the Route Toward Applications. Sci 2002;297:787-792.
- Rius G, et al. Robust operation and performance of integrated carbon nanotubes atomic force microscopy probes. J Phys Conf Series 2013;417:012072 -1-6.
- Mukul K and Yoshinori A. Chemical Vapor Deposition of Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Growth Mechanism and Mass Production. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2010;10:3739-3758.
- Jing K, et al. Chemical vapor deposition of methane for single-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 1998;292:567-574.
- SunKe, et al. Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes. J Appl Phys 2009;105:074316-1-5.
- Clark IT, et al. Mechanical and electronic characteristics of scanning probe microscopy probes based on coaxial palladium nanowire/carbon nanotube hybrid structures. J Vac Sci Technol B 2010;28:1148-1152.
- Daniel S, et al. A review of DNA functionalized/grafted carbon nanotubes and their characterization. Sensor Actuator B, 2007;122:672-682.
- Mu Qingxin, et al. Protein Binding by Functionalized Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Is Governed by the Surface Chemistry of Both Parties and the Nanotube Diameter. J Phys Chem 2008;112:3300-3307.
- Eric P, et al. Thermal Conductance of an Individual Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube above Room Temperature Nano Lett 2005;6:96-100.
- Klemens PG. Graphite, Graphene and Carbon nanotube, Thermal Conductivity 26: Thermal Expansion 14: J Conf, August 6-8, 2001, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA 2005.
- Hopkins PE and Duda JC. Introduction to Nanoscale Thermal Conduction. Heat Transfer – Math Model, Numer Meth Inform Technol 2011;305-330.
- Michael FL, et al. Carbon Nanotubes: Present and Future Commercial Applications. Sci 2013;339:535-539.
- Osman MA and Srivastava D. Temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of single-wall carbon nanotubes Nanotechnol 2001;12:21-24.
- Popov Valentin N. Carbon nanotubes: properties and application. Mater Sci Eng R 2004;43:61-102.