ISSN: E 2347-226X, P 2319-9857

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Assessment of Available Heavy Metals Concentration and Soils Properties in Kurdistan Province, Western of Iran

Fatemeh Ahmadi*

Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

*Corresponding Author:
Fatemeh Ahmadi
Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
E-mail: Soilscience2017@gmail.com

Received Date: 06/10/2017; Accepted Date: 06/11/2017; Published Date: 13/11/2017

Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Journal of Agriculture and Allied Sciences

Abstract

Heavy metals (HMs) are the main pollutants in the environment. Over many years, high loadings of chemical fertilizers in intensive crop productions in Iran lead to environmental risks and ecological wastage. For better and accurate fertilizer recommendation, it is necessary to investigation of HMs sorption in soils. The objective of this research was to assess the available heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn) concentration in greenhouse site at two different depths (0-20 and 20- 40 cm) in Western Iran. Available heavy metals concentration in studied soils was high in compare with other researches of different countries, due to inputs as impurities from different fertilizers. Manganese, Pb and Zn had highest concentrations among different heavy metals in almost greenhouse studied soil samples. Therefore, balanced fertilization plans and reductions in the concentrations of heavy metals in both fertilizers and manures must be commended to preserve a safe concentration of heavy metals in greenhouse soils.

Keywords

Available concentration, Heavy metals, soil, pollution, Kurdistan, Iran

Introduction

With the rapid urbanization and increasing demand for agricultural products, the greenhouse cultivations in many countries are growing rapidly today so that compared to the open cultivations, green house productions have more economic performance for agriculture producers [1-5]. More countries are now involved in greenhouse productions, such as Europe, Canada, Mexico and United States of America (especially California and Florida). Greenhouses are growing widely in other Asian countries as India, Japan and South Korea [6,7]. The Iran ranks are twentieth in the greenhouse productions in the world. More vegetables are produced in Iran in greenhouse cultivation systems including cucumber (Cucumis sativus), Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), Sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum), strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) and mixed greens. It is well known that, despite the quantity of agricultural products, attention to quality is a crucial factor that should be considered [8,9]. Greenhouse production systems have beneficial effects and also have detrimental effects on environment and agriculture sector [10]. Greenhouse cultivations by providing artificial conditions have an especially important role in agricultural development. Increased production per unit area, produce more than one crop per year, precise control of pests and disease with biological methods, continuity of work and production in all seasons of the year are the most important factors that leads the farmers into the greenhouse cultivation in Iran. The quality of human life depends on the chemical composition of used food and environment conditions [11,12]. Poor management and lack of attention to scientific principles in greenhouse cultivations due to low awareness of farmers has created many environmental problems [13,14]. Intensive management in greenhouses includes application of excessive chemical and organic fertilizers and pesticides, large cropping index and high temperature that somehow causes to ecological and soil pollution problems like the accumulation of contaminations in soil and plants. Accumulation of heavy metals in plants, leading to a risk to human health in the food chain as consumers of agricultural products [15,1]. Since greenhouse vegetable consumption has become an important part of human diet, to ensure food safety, it is essential to investigate the role of effective factors on heavy metals and other pollutants accumulation in greenhouse soils and products. So the aim of this study was to assess the influence of high rate application of fertilizers on heavy metals accumulation and mobility in greenhouse site of Western Iran.

Material and Methods

Studied area was a greenhouse town of western Iran, Kurdistan province (Latitude 360 00' N and longitude 470 00'E), with an area less than 700 m2. The management approach in greenhouse studied area was based on use of different chemical fertilizers. Average of applied chemical fertilizers rate was about 120 t ha-1.year-1. Urea, Superphosphate and compound fertilizers were main types of applied chemical fertilizers in studied greenhouse area. The usual style of irrigation in greenhouses was drip irrigation. Greenhouses were managed in this way for ten years from the time of establishment. The main vegetables in studied greenhouse were cucumber and tomato. Soil samples were collected in August 2016. Seven soil samples from various greenhouses in Kurdistan greenhouse town were collected. Sampling in each site was done in two different depths (0-20 and 20-40 cm), using stainless-steel auger. While, one nonagricultural sample in two different depths in studied province, near the greenhouse site, was randomly chosen for comparison. Each soil sample was a mixture of five sub-samples, and collected using polyethylene bags and pre-treatment by being air-dried at room temperature (25 ± 1°C), ground and sieved through 2- mm for physiochemical analysis.

Chemical analyzing

Soil properties were determined according to methods given in Rowell (1994). Soil pH was measured using 1:5 soil to water ratio suspension with a glass electrode pH meter (model Inolab pH 7110). Soil electrical conductivity (EC) was measured using a glass electrode (model 712 conductometer) after mixing the soil with water (1:5, w/v). Organic matter was determined according to the Walky-Black method, which is based on the oxidation of organic matter with K2Cr2O7 and H2SO4 and titration with FeSO4. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) was measured by saturation the soil with 1 mol L-1 sodium acetate solution (pH 8.2), washing soil soluble sodium (Na+) with 96% ethanol and extracting exchangeable Na+ with 1 mol L-1 of neutral ammonium acetate. Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) was determined after boiling of 2.5 g soil with 25 ml of 0.5 N HCl and titration with 0.25 N NaOH. In accordance with Lindsay and Narvel (1978), mixed extractants consist of 0.005 mol l-1 DTPA (Diethylene triamine penta acetic acid), 0.01 mol L-1 CaCl2 and 0.1 moL-1 TEA (tri ethanol amine) in pH 7.3 was used to extract available heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn). Available concentration of different heavy metals was measured using atomic adsorption spectrometer. The concentration of heavy metals was present as mg kg-1 dry weight. Two replications were analysed per sample to control the accuracy of the results.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was conducted using the SAS (Version 9.3), statically software package (SAS Institute, 2011) and Microsoft Excel 2013. Duncan test in a complete randomized block design was done to determine significant differences (P<0.05) of soil chemical properties in greenhouse and open field soils. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to available concentration of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn) obtained for all samples in the 0-20 and 20-40 cm of greenhouse soils layer separately, by using Minitab 16 Statically software.

Results and Discussion

Soil Properties

The main chemical characteristics of Kurdistan soil samples were given in (Table 1). The pH in studied soil samples ranged from 7.03 to 8.09 with an average value of 7.56 that was lower than an arable soil pH (average value 8.13). This was may be due to the respiration of root plants and increase of CO2 pressure in root zone in intensive cultivation greenhouses that can reduce the pH of rhizosphere or nitrification processes [16-18]. Electrical conductivity (EC) was also variable, ranging 0.10 to 1.52 dS m-1 in Kurdistan greenhouse soil samples that were significantly about 6 times higher than the arable soil In all soil samples, EC was higher in top soil than subsoil except for soil 1 in greenhouse soil sample (may be due to the lower temperature of greenhouse and salts accumulation in subsoil). High temperature in greenhouse conditions and evaporation causes to capillary raise and upward migration of salts in top soils and increase the soil salinity [17,4]. The study of Yun-Cai et al. showed that the EC of studied Chinese greenhouse soil varied between 1.9 to 9.9 dS m-1. They reported that high nitrate accumulation in soil results in salinization problems. It is clear that, due to high application of different fertilizers in greenhouse cultivations, organic matter (OM) content was high in comparison with arable soil (average of 2.8% in studied greenhouse soil samples), The results of researches in greenhouse soils of Turkey shows that the average of OM was about 3.48%. While the OM content in agricultural lands was about 2.05% [19]. Chen et al. reported that the OM content in greenhouse soils was 2 times more than in agricultural soils. Wang et al. indicated that in agricultural lands under wheat and maize cultivations OM was about 1.1%. As shown in (Table 1), OM content decreased by increasing the depth that was in agreement with the results of Kong et al. researches. Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) contents varied from 10.71 to 19.94% (average 15.32%) in Kurdistan greenhouse soils. The significant difference was observed between greenhouse and arable soils in CaCO3 contents (Table 1). The average of CEC in greenhouse soils ranging from 8.53 to 22.16 cmolc kg-1. Cation exchange capacity in greenhouse soils was about 4 and 3 times higher than arable soils. High OM content indicated the noticeable Cation exchange capacity (CEC) of greenhouse soil samples.

Soil No. Depth (cm) pH EC (dS m-1) OM (%) CaCO3 (%) CEC (cmolc kg-1)
1 0-20 7.56b 0.10d 1.68bc 15.11bc 19.36b
20-40 7.71b 0.36d 1.00c 13.43c 15.90bc
2 0-20 7.39bc 0.79c 2.01bc 14.31e 21.26a
20-40 7.48bc 0.47c 1.34bc 12.32c 8.53c
3 0-20 7.09c 1.52a 3.02ab 19.94c 19..00bc
20-40 7.41bc 0.88b 2.01ab 19.39c 13.58a
4 0-20 7.18c 1.50a 3.36a 19.27c 21.84a
20-40 7.20bc 0.89b 2.35b 15.12e 16.53bc
5 0-20 7.28bc 1.15ab 2.68b 15.12bc 22.16a
20-40 7.43bc 1.13ab 1.34c 18.25d 17.90bc
6 0-20 7.31bc 1.22ab 3.25a 14.16e 19.53b
20-40 7.50bc 0.51bc 2.35a 10.71f 11.05c
7 0-20 7.36b 0.95b 3.36bc 18.71d 21.58a
20-40 7.59a 0.73c 1.00c 12.43bc 11.56c
Arable soil 0-20 7.91a 0.29d 1.00d 21.44b 9.34cd
20-40 7.56b 0.13d 0.67d 23.38a 8.64c

Table 1. Chemical properties of studied greenhouse and arable soil samples.

In fact, decomposition of organic matter in pH above 3 (PZC of organic matter) leads to negative charge sites that increase the CEC in soils [18,4]. As the result, increase of CEC was occurred in soils under greenhouse Conditions. Moritsuka et al. reported that the average of CEC in greenhouse soils of China was 18.7 cmolc kg-1. The average of CEC in greenhouse and open field soils of China were 25.5 and 17.25 cmolc kg-1 respectively [20,4,12].

Greenhouse soils

Available concentrations of studied greenhouse soils were shown in (Table 2). The available concentrations of Mn, Pb and Zn (approximately average of 7.27, 8.99 and 8.39 mg kg-1 respectively) were more than other different available heavy metals (approximately the average concentrations of available Cu, Fe and Ni were 4.28, 1.68 and 1.60 mg kg-1 respectively) in most of greenhouse soil samples, while, the average available concentrations of different heavy metals in arable soils were lower than greenhouse soils (Table 2). It was possibly due to the impurities of different fertilizers, long-term and high rates of fertilizer application to greenhouse soils. Yang et al. reported that the average of available Cu, Pb and Zn in Chinese greenhouse soils ranging from 25.70 to 52.30ϒ 26.80 to 52.70 and 84.90 to 92.70 mg kg-1 respectively that had not significant differences with open field soils. Available concentration of heavy metals in Spain greenhouse soils were 30.20ϒ 36.00 and 68.90 mg kg-1 for Cuϒ Ni and Pb respectively. Whereas, Agricultural lands in Spain have about 3 times lower concentrations than greenhouse soils [21,22]. The results of Sungur et al. in greenhouse soils of Turkey showed that the average of available concentrations of Cuϒ Niϒ Pb and Zn were 34.95ϒ 44.66ϒ 15.63 and 43.91 mg kg-1 respectively whereas, the available heavy metals concentration in arable soils of Turkey were 1.30ϒ 0.24ϒ 0.10 and 1.80 mg kg-1 for Cuϒ Niϒ Pb and Zn, respectively [8,23,16]. According to the soil depth, the available concentrations of various heavy metals were more in topsoil than subsoil samples, in more cases, which is dangerous in root plant uptake and plant tissues toxicity and high health risks to consumers.

Zn Pb Ni Mn Fe Cu Depth (cm) Soil no.
mg kg-1
6.24d 7.56c 1.55c 5.32d 2.32b 7.21a 0-20 1
8.92cd 6.80d 0.56d 1.36d 2.29b 6.56b 20-40
9.38b 10.00b 1.12cd 8.93a 1.82c 2.80d 0-20 2
7.66cd 8.40cd 1.36c 6.54c 0.75d 2.60d 20-40
6.86cd 6.00e 1.16a 7.77b 2.22bc 5.64bc 0-20 3
5.01e 0.80h 2.68a 1.33d 1.71bc 4.16b 20-40
10.35ab 10.00b 1.32a 8.91a 0.83d 1.92c 0-20 4
9.71b 2.40f 2.56a 8.78a 0.42ab 2.48c 20-40
5.07e 11.25a 1.55c 7.19b 1.58c 6.32b 0-20 5
8.60c 7.33c 0.32a 3.75c 0.63cd 3.88c 20-40
11.47a 10.33ab 2.36a 8.81a 2.90a 2.68d 0-20 6
10.76a 4.25g 1.50c 1.82d 0.18ab 2.56cd 20-40
9.41b 7.85c 2.15b 4.02cd 0.13e 3.44c 0-20 7
7.24cd 6.00ab 0.64d 1.71b 0.61cd 4.40bc 20-40
2.36f 7.00d 1.36c 8.50ab 2.45b 2.60cd 0-20 Arable soil
5.65e 6.40ab 2.84a 7.44b 1.84bc 1.60e 20-40

Table 2. Average concentration of available heavy metals.

Principal component analysis

Principal component analysis (PCA) was performance on the data of available heavy metals content in topsoil and subsoil greenhouse samples of studied soils in order to better understand their interrelationships. Tables 3 and 4 show the factors, eigenvalues and associated variance explained in the chemical data of Greenhouse surface (0-20 cm) and subsoil (20-40 cm) samples respectively. Three factors all had eigenvalues higher than one. Three extracted factors explain 62.7 and 81.5% and 82.9 and 84.8% of data set variance in topsoil and subsoil of Sanandaj samples. Based on eigenvalues, three principal components (PC1, PC2 and PC3) cumulatively explained 62.7 and 82.9% of total variance in top soils and 79.0 and 84.8% in subsoil of Sanandaj greenhouse samples. PC1 explained 36.0% of total variance and showed positive factor loading for Cd and Mn (0.543 and 0.598), PC2 and PC3 exhibited 25.8 and 21.1% of total variance and showed positive factor loading for Pb (0.527) and Cu (0.452) in topsoil, respectively. Zinc, Fe and Ni showed partial loading among PC1, PC2 and PC3. While PC1, PC2 and PC3 in subsoil samples exposed 44.2, 23.1 and 17.5% of total Variance and showed positive factor loading for Cd, Ni and Fe and Mn respectively. Other heavy metals (Cu, Pb and Zn) did not present a clear separation in Sanandaj greenhouse subsoil samples. Karimi Nezhad et al. suggested that Cu, Mn, Pb and Zn had positive relation factor in PCA analysis in soils of Ahvaz, Iran. Kong et al., found that Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn had positively relation in surface greenhouse soils and derived from agricultural production activities. Bai et al, suggested that greenhouse cultivation had a significant effect on the accumulation of Cd, Cu and Zn in soils. Heavy metals input to the soil from natural and anthropogenic resources. PC1 can be consider to present anthropogenic input since the mean concentrations of Cd, Mn, Ni and Pb in greenhouse soils were higher than arable soils (Table 2). The anthropogenic inputs of these metals likely include irrigation, fertilization, pesticide application and atmospheric deposition resulting from industrialized activities [21,24,25].

Element Rotated component matrix
PC1 PC2 PC3
Cd 0.543 0.287 -0.033
Cu -0.157 -0.486 0.452
Fe 0.278 -0.268 -0.568
Mn 0.598 0.117 0.168
Ni 0.384 -0.522 -0.145
Pb 0.072 0.527 0.214
Zn -0.305 0.213 -0.614
Eigenvalue 2.52 1.803 1.478
% variance explained 36 25.8 21.1
% Cumulative variance 36 61.8 82.9

Table 3. Matrix of principal component analysis for available heavy metals in 0-20 cm.

Element Rotated component matrix
PC1 PC2 PC3
Cd 0.533 -0.173 -0.016
Cu -0.368 0.119 -0.487
Fe 0.161 0.66 0.252
Mn 0.091 -0.57 0.531
Ni 0.513 0.134 -0.136
Pb 0.171 -0.39 -0.607
Zn -0.504 -0.157 0.172
Eigenvalue 3.091 1.614 1.22
% variance explained 44.2 23.1 17.5
% Cumulative variance 44.2 67.2 84.8

Table 4. Matrix of principal component analysis for available heavy metals in 20-40 cm.

Conclusions

The heavy metals available concentration and soil properties in greenhouse site of western Iran were investigated. The results indicated that Mn, Pb and Zn had the highest concentration in most of soil studied in studied greenhouse soils, and were more accumulated in top soils than subsoils. Compare with arable soils, anthropogenic activities such as excessive and long-term use of fertilizers and manures are the main sources of soil pollution. Perfect management patterns, especially in use of chemical fertilizers and use of require strategies should be performed to reduce the high rate of pollutants accumulation in soils and ground water resources and ensure the food safety [26-30]. Adequate and effective agricultural extension services to help disseminate and implement fertilizer strategies are also needed. Since small scale farming is correlated with over fertilization, a conversion to large scale production with unified management, such as cooperatives and enterprises, would also reduce heavy metal contamination in these soils.

Acknowledgement

The Author is grateful to Mr. Panahi for preparing soil samples and Laboratory Equipments in the Bu-Ali Sina University.

References