Reach Us +447480022765
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Sociodemographic and Clinical Characterization of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

>Liscia Divana Carvalho Silva1*, Edipo Luan De Carvalho Caminha2, Nerilce Soares Ferreira1, Carlos Alberto Campos Junior1and Joseildes Castelo Branco Souza1

1Universidade Federal do Maranhao, Sao Luís, MA, Brazil

2Universidade Federal do Ceara, Sao Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

*Corresponding Author:
Liscia Divana Carvalho Silva
Nurse, PhD, Professor
Nursing Department, Universidade Federal do Maranhao. Rua Parnaiba 1 Apt.
700 - Casa do Morro Torre Marcos Regadas
CEP: 65075-839, Sao Luis, MA, Brazil.
Tel: +55 98991595858
E-mail: liscia@elointernet.com.br

Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences

Abstract

Objective: To perform the sociodemographic, economic and clinical characterization of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). Method: Cross-sectional study with 50 subjects. Sociodemographic, economic and clinical data were collected. To verify an association between the variables, the IMB SPSSStatistics Software was used using the chi-square and t-student test for paired samples. Results: The socio-demographic and economic characterization showed prevalence of men, 29 (58%), average age 63 years, incomplete elementary school, 20 (40%), income of a minimum wage, 24 (48%), rural workers, 17 (34%), Catholic religion, 34 (68%). Clinical characterization showed a prevalence of patients with systemic arterial hypertension, 39 (78%), bradycardia, 18 (36%), cardiac device implantation up to five years, 24 (48%), without generator replacement, 31 (62%), use of antihypertensive medications, 41 (82%) and sedentary lifestyle, 34 (68%). The predominant implantable electronic cardiac device was pacemaker, 41 (82%). Only 9 patients (18%) used the implantable cardioverter defibrillator. there was significance in sex (pvalue=0.259), household (p-value=0.356) and pacemaker implantation time (p-value=0.07). Other variables did not present statistically significant construction. Conclusion: There were no patients using resynchronizer. The results are similar to those found in other studies, however, it is suggested that the research proposal be extended to other realities and services.

Keywords

Artificial pacemaker, Artificial cardiac stimulation, Cardiac electroversion.

Introduction

Cardiac arrhythmias are the result of an abnormality in the generation and/or conduction of electrical impulse, leading to non-rhythmic contraction. The physiopathology involves several mechanisms related to automaticity in impulse generation, post-depolarization and impulse conduction. Normally the electrical activation of the heart arises in the sinoatrial node. In the case of arrhythmias, other subsidiary pacemakers can initiate the electrical impulse, as an alteration that leads to the propagation of the impulse along an abnormal path [1].

These disorders are common in the general population, especially in individuals with cardiac arrhythmias who may go through life without clinical manifestations or without compromising the quality of life. The wide spectrum of arrhythmias' presentation and related risks make patient handling a major challenge for healthcare professionals, facilities and services. The most frequent arrhythmias are sinoatrial node dysfunction, supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation [2,3].

Among the risk factors related to cardiac arrhythmias are inflammatory conditions involving the cardiac muscle, such as myocarditis, coronary artery disease, valve disease and ventricular dysfunction [4]. The clinical presentation of arrhythmias is varied, and the most frequently observed symptoms are palpitation, presyncope, syncope and precordialgia. The diagnosis is based on clinical history, physical examination and electrocardiographic record. Some arrhythmias have specific characteristics on the electrocardiogram, and it is essential to choose the method of electrocardiographic recording, often using the holter (event recorder) and the tilt test (orthostatic inclination). Unlike some other popularly known heart diseases, arrhythmias often lack the approach and care they need [1].

The careful evaluation of users of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED)is justified by exposure to risk situations due to the underlying heart disease that resulted in the need to use the device or the presence of such device, which may eventually suffer electromagnetic interference, presenting dysfunctions and leading to unpredictable risk situations, such as shock shots of the implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) [5].

Methods

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted from June to November 2018. The population consisted of individuals of both sexes, with medical diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmia and attending the Cardiology Ambulatory of a University Hospital in the state of Maranhão, Brazil.

Inclusion criteria were adolescents and adults with CIED for a minimum of four weeks. The determination of this cohort is due to the belief that children would present different situations of the health-disease process, and related to the minimum period of the device, it must be taken into account the adaptation process, being contemplated in the assessment instruments. For the evaluation of physical activity, it was considered active, that is, non-sedentary, the individual who engages in any physical activity twice a week for at least sixty minutes. However, those who do not perform any activity or perform it less than twice a week were considered inactive or sedentary [6].

In compliance with Resolution nº 466/12 of the National Health Council, the project was forwarded to the Research Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão [7], having received a favorable opinion under no. 2.605.937.

Results

Table 1 presents the sociodemographic and economic variables (sex, age, race, marital status, education, income, profession, religion and origin).

Variables N %
Age
14 to 34 years 6 12
35 to 55 years 6 12
56 to 76 years 23 46
77 to 86 years 15 30
Sex
Male 29 58
Female 21 42
Race
Brown 24 48
Black 19 38
White 7 14
Marital status
Common-law marriage * 23 46
Single 13 26
Divorced 3 6
Widowed 11 22
Education level
Illiterate 10 20
Complete primary school 10 20
Incomplete primary school 20 40
Complete high school 6 12
Complete higher education 3 6
Post-graduated 1 2
Income
1 minimum wage 24 48
2 to 3 minimum wages 22 44
3 to 4 minimum wages 4 8
Profession
Rural worker 17 34
Fisherman 3 6
General services assistant 2 4
Self-employed 2 4
Merchant 2 4
Others 24 48
Religion
Catholicism 42 84
Evangelical 8 16
Origin
Capital city 22 44
Other municipality 28 56
Total 50 100

Table 1. Frequency distribution of sociodemographic and economic variables of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Males predominated, 29 (58%), age 56 to 76 years, 23 (44%), average age 63 years (± 18.93), brown race, 24 (48%), stable union, 23 (46%), incomplete elementary school, 20 (40%), income equivalent to a minimum wage, 24 (48%), rural workers, 17 (34%), catholic religion, 42 (84%) and coming from the interior of the state of Maranhão, Brazil, 28 (56%) (Table 1).

Table 2 shows the frequencies of the clinical variables of the patients: comorbidity, heart disease, time of implantation of the cardiac device, generator replacement, medication use and lifestyle.

Variables N %
Comorbidity *
Hypertension 39 78
Diabetes 10 20
Dyslipidemia 6 12
Underlying cardiopathy
Bradycardia 18 36
Total atrioventricular block 12 24
Atrioventricular block 1st or 2nd degree 9 18
Ventricular tachycardia 5 10
Other 6 12
Cardiac device implantation time
0 to 5 years 24 48
5 to 10 years 15 30
> 10 years 11 22
Generator replacement
No replacement 31 62
1 to 5 years 17 34
5 to 10 years 2 4
Medications *
Antihypertensives 41 82
Antidiabetics 6 12
Platelet antiaggregant 10 20
Cholesterol inhibitor 10 20
Antiarrhythmics 6 12
None 6 12
Alcoholism
Yes 3 6
No 47 94
Smoking
Yes 3 6
No 44 88
Former smoker 3 6
Physical activity
Yes 16 32
No 34 68
Total 50 100

Table 2. Frequency distribution of clinical variables of individuals with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Prevailed individuals with systemic arterial hypertension, 39 (78%), bradycardia, 18 (36%), heart device implantation up to five years, 24 (48%), without generator replacement, 31 (62%) and under use of antihypertensive medications, 41 (82%). When asked about lifestyle habits, most denied alcohol consumption, 47 (94%), cigarettes, 44 (88%) and regular physical activity, 34 (68%), as shown in Table 2.

Regarding prevalent heart disease, in addition to arrhythmias (bradycardia, atrioventricular blocks and ventricular tachycardia), there was less frequent arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, sinus node disease, dilated cardiomyopathy and chronic atrial fibrillation, characterized as “others”. Individuals described as feeling of arrhythmia perception "the heart beating faster" or "feeling faint". Table 3 shows the types of cardiac implantable electronic devices used in individuals.

Device type N %
Cardiac pacemaker 41 82
Implantable cardiac defibrillator 09 18

Table 3. Types of cardiac implantable electronic devices used by patients. São Luís - MA, 2019.

Regarding the types of cardiac implantable electronic devices, pacemaker, 41 (82%) was predominant. Just 9 patients (18%) used the implantable cardiac defibrillator. There were no patients using resynchronizer. In both cases the admitted confidence interval was p ≤ 0.05. It was observed that there was a significant association in relation to gender (pvalue= 0.259), origin (p-value=0.356) and device implant time (p-value=0.07). Other variables did not present statistically significant construction.

Discussion

In the present study, men with advanced age, poor education and income prevailed. Studies indicate that there are no modifiable risk factors associated with increased heart disease such as aging, male gender, low education, and unfavorable socioeconomic status. Morbidity and mortality in Brazil is closely related to cardiovascular risk factors, representing 20% of the population over 30 years and mostly male. Healthcare policies have a great challenge, especially in health promotion and identification of individuals susceptible to develop heart disease, especially cardiac arrhythmias, leading to a 44% reduction in mortality [2].

Aging increases the possibility of the individual developing an arrhythmia that culminates in the use of some implantable cardiac device, such as pacemaker or defibrillators [8-10]. These conditions may be detrimental to self-care in individuals with CIED, especially in their health-disease process, which may interfere with treatment adherence [10,11].

Patients denied being alcoholics and/or smokers. However, they recognized not engaging in any regular physical activity. A study conducted at the Cardiology Reference Hospital of 63 cardiac patients, showed that physical activity improved blood flow and endothelial function, suggesting that physical activity positively influences aspects of the patient's quality of life [12].

Individuals with CIED may already have been victims of a potentially fatal arrhythmic event, including recovered cardiac arrest (secondary prevention), or, although they have never experienced such events, are considered at high risk to have it (primary prevention). They may still experience partial or total loss of consciousness, generating safety concerns for performing their daily activities or causing harm to others [13].

It is recognized that restrictions on the use of CIED may limit personal freedom, security and well-being. Some flexibility should be allowed, but the risks associated with recurrence of cardiac arrhythmia should be prioritized and therefore cannot be overlooked. There is a risk of sudden disability in both asymptomatic individuals and those with sudden symptoms. However, most arrhythmia sufferers are unaware of risk situations and may still experience safety concerns when performing daily activities. A study conducted in the United Kingdom points out among the main restrictions of activities, driving vehicles, due to the possibility of partial or total loss of consciousness. Sudden or even fatal disability can compromise the necessary safety margin, interfering with their lives [14].

The same study shows that patients with implantable cardiac devices can count on a more active lifestyle, as it has contributed to improved quality of life and prevention of cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, professional monitoring is essential [14]. Physical inactivity is defined [15] as the absence of activity with appreciable energy expenditure (>2 to 3 times the rest value), whether in work, personal transportation or leisure. Trappé et al. [16], emphasizes the importance to maintaining an active lifestyle on cardiovascular health, especially in individuals with pacemakers or defibrillators, and highlights the monitoring of the professional multidisciplinary team, especially the physical educator, in order to properly program the heart rate of cardiac defibrillator [17].

Similar to this research, it was found in the literature a higher prevalence of systemic arterial hypertension, bradycardia and atrioventricular block, which were the main indications for the use of CIED [10,18]. In the present study, individuals with implantation of the device up to five years of age and who did not need to replace it predominated, which seems to be beneficial as the implantation time is associated with quality of life and greater vitality [9]. The author clarifies that the longer the implantation time, the more decline in quality of life, and emphasizes the need for follow-up with an electrophysiologist to verify the functioning of the cardiac device, and when necessary, after some years, to replace it. Regarding the types and therapeutic options of the devices, it is clarified that the pacemaker has the capacity of stimulation/sensitization as a therapeutic function of bradyarrhythmias; cardioversion/defibrillation by shock or rapid pacing as a therapeutic function of tachyarrhythmias and cardiac resynchronizer of multisite (biventricular) pacing as a function of ventricular resynchronization. There is also the cardiac defibrillator associated with the resynchronizer, with added functions [19].

Conclusion

The socio-demographic and economic characterization showed a prevalence of men, 29 (58%), aged 56 to 76 years, 23 (44%), brown race, 24 (48%), with a stable union, 23 (46%), an incomplete primary education, 20 (40%), a minimum wage income, 24 (48%), being rural workers, 17 (34%), belonging to Catholic religion, 42 (84%) and coming from the interior of the state of Maranhão, Brazil 28 (56%). The clinical characterization showed a prevalence of patients with systemic arterial hypertension, 39 (78%), bradycardia, 18 (36%), cardiac device implantation up to five years, 24 (48%), without generator replacement, 31 (62%), under use of antihypertensive medications, 41 (82%) and having a sedentary lifestyle, 34 (68%).

The results of the research are similar to those found in other studies, however, it is suggested that the proposal of this research be extended to other realities and services. As limitations of the study, it is highlighted the small sample and the location where it was developed, a specialized service.

References