Previous Page  4 / 6 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 6 Next Page
Page Background

allied

academies

Page 13

Research & Reviews: Journal of Engineering and Technology | ISSN: 2319-9873 | Volume 8

May 23-24, 2019 | Vienna, Austria

Robotics and Artificial Intelligence

2

nd

International Conference on

Notes:

C

ell Assemblies (CAs) are crucial to human andmammalian

cognition and behaviour. A CA is a group of neurons that

canmaintain firing without external stimulation. Our symbolic

concepts, like dog, are represented by CAs. Many non-human

mammals do not have symbols, but they do have concepts.

So, a rat will probably have a generic CA for cat, which will fire

when a cat is present.

There is an enormous gap in the academic community's

understanding of CAs, how they affect motor control, and

how they regulate sensing. Theoretically, my CA for walk to

the door is firing when I am walking to the door, but it is

not clear how that interacts with central pattern generators

(CPGs), or even if those neurons that execute the CPG are

part of the CA. Similarly, it is clear that, for instance, neurons

in the primary visual cortex are involved when a human

view a dog, but it is not entirely clear how they lead to the

ignition of the dog CA, or which neurons are in the dog CA.

As there's a gap, I, and my collaborators, are trying to fill

the gap. I am a computer scientist, so I am trying to develop

programs based on CAs. In particular, we think embodiment

is important, and that working from simulated neurons is

important. So, we work with robots, virtual and physical. We

work with spiking neurons, typically point models. We have

been developing neural topologies that can be used for virtual

agents. We are now working as part of the Human Brain

Project, developing topologies that can be reused by others

to implement agents. We have done a fair bit of work on

developing "higher" function such as neuro-cognitive models

of natural language parsing and learning a two-choice task.

We have also done some work with physical robots. We

developed the neural software for a simple Braitenberg robot

that followed lines using vision; this was based on our CA

work. We are currently developing CA based neural models

for grasping control that are also neuro-cognitive models

of a stop task. More recently, we have been working on the

forwardmodel for a fast walking robot. This work does not use

currently make use of CAs. Instead, it approximates standard

analytical models (like a cart and pole) with point neurons;

neurons are turing complete. The plan is to continue on with

this work. We can explore the use of CAs in virtual robots. It

is my contention that following this approach, mimicking the

human model as closely as possible, physically, neurally, and

psychologically is the best way to get to Turing test passing

AI. It also has the benefits of furthering our understanding of

human neural and psychological processing and developing

systems that are useful. These more useful systems include

robots.

Speaker Biography

ChristianHuyckcompletedhisPhD in1994fromtheUniversityofMichigan.

He is the professor of Artificial Intelligence at Middlesex University and

has over 100 publications. He has been head of the AI research group at

Middlesex for over 20 years. His two main areas of research are natural

language processing and processing with simulated neurons.

e:

c.huyck@mdx.ac.uk

Christian Huyck

Middlesex University, UK

Cell Assemblies and Robots

Christian Huyck

, JET, Volume 8 | ISSN: 2319-9873