e-ISSN: 2322-0139 p-ISSN: 2322-0120

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Drugs in Different Animal Species

Dave Stephen*

Department of Pharmacy, La Salle University of Cuernavaca, Cuernavaca, Mexico

*Corresponding Author:
Dave Stephen
Department of Pharmacy, La Salle University of Cuernavaca, Cuernavaca, Mexico
E-mail:
davesteph@umassmed.edu

Received: 02-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. JPTS-23-101188; Editor assigned: 05-Jun-2023, Pre QC No. JPTS-23-94204 (PQ); Reviewed: 19-Jun-2023, QC No. JPTS-23-101188; Revised: 26-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. JPTS-23-101188 (R); Published: 03-July-2023, DOI:10.4172/2322-0139.11.2.004

Citation: Stephen D. Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Drugs in Different Animal Species. J Pharmacol Toxicol Stud.2023;11:007.

Copyright: © 2023 Stephen D. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicological Studies

Description

The pharmacokinetic properties of drugs vary significantly not only across different drugs but also across animal species. This makes extrapolating data from animal studies to humans a complex endeavor. While animal testing provides valuable insights into the safety and efficacy of new drugs, researchers must account for various factors when scaling results to humans.

Metabolic rate: Animals generally have a faster metabolic rate than humans, so drugs may be cleared from their systems more quickly. This can make certain drugs appear safer and more effective in animals than they turn out to be in humans.

Enzyme activity: Animals often have different levels of enzyme activity that can impact how drugs are absorbed and broken down. This affects the dose required to produce a pharmacological effect.

This affects the dose required to produce a pharmacological effect.

Body size and composition: Larger animals tend to require higher drug doses, while differences in body fat percentage can impact drug distribution.

Protein binding: The extent to which drugs bind to plasma proteins varies across species, which influences the amount of "free" or active drug available.

Despite these challenges, animal pharmacokinetic studies remain invaluable for establishing a drug's basic properties before human clinical trials. With careful experimental design and by accounting for interspecies differences, researchers can gain useful insights to guide the development of safe and effective new medicines for patients.

The pharmacokinetic differences between animal species also impact drug interactions. Various molecules compete for the same metabolic enzymes and transporters in the body. While many drug interactions observed in animal studies also occur in humans, the magnitude and clinical relevance can vary significantly. Researchers must determine appropriate animal models and dosing regimens that best reflect potential human drug interactions.

Additionally, differences in physiology and disease states between animals and humans become especially important for certain drug classes. For example, targeting hormones and neurotransmitters may require animal models that closely mimic human physiology. Researchers often utilize specially bred strains of animals that more accurately represent human disease conditions for testing new therapeutic agents.

To improve the predictive value of animal pharmacokinetic data, researchers are exploring advanced methods like using humanized animal models. These involve genetically modifying animals to express certain human proteins and enzymes. Though technically challenging, humanized models show promise for bridging the gaps between animals and humans, ultimately helping to optimize new drugs for safe and effective human use.

Overall, refining experimental designs, selecting appropriate animal models, and utilizing new techniques like humanized models can enhance the translatability of preclinical pharmacokinetic data to humans. With a thorough understanding of interspecies differences and careful study design, researchers can maximize the insights gained from animal pharmacokinetic studies to reduce risks and expedite the development of innovative new medicines.

Researchers continually refine preclinical methods to obtain more predictive data from animal studies. Higher-fidelity models allow scientists to identify potential safety issues earlier and uncover signals that help optimize drug candidates. Computational tools are also being integrated to model pharmacokinetics across species. Combining these advanced techniques with traditional animal studies provides a more complete picture of how drugs behave in the body.

Another avenue for improvement involves testing multiple animal species in parallel. Different species often complement each other, with each providing unique insights. For instance, nonhuman primates are biologically closest to humans but rodents are easier to study in large numbers. Utilizing both types of models can offer a more comprehensive view of a candidate drug's properties.

Incorporating non-animal testing methods whenever possible helps reduce costs and refine study designs. For example, microfluidic "organ-on-a-chip" systems mimic human tissue and organ functions in vitro. Combining data from these human tissue models with data from humanized animal models could accelerate the clinical translation of new drugs.

Employing a multi-pronged approach that integrates higher-fidelity animal and non-animal testing methods will likely yield the most predictive and translatable preclinical pharmacokinetic data. With continued improvements and innovations, the gap between animals and humans will narrow, enabling researchers to design safer and more effective drugs from the beginning.