Technology and its Role in Agriculture

Abstract

For many of years, people have been occupied in enhancing the harvests and animals they raise. From past few years, researchers have attempted their endeavours by expanding and rectifying the methods of choice and breeding. Though significant progress has been accomplished, conventional determination and breeding are tedious and bear technical limitations.

Keywords

Agriculture, Genetic, Economies.

Introduction

Modern biotechnology can possibly accelerate the advancement and arrangement of improved crops and animals. Marker-assisted selection, for instance, builds the effectiveness of routine plant reproducing by permitting fast, research -based investigation of large number of people without the need to cultivate plants to development in the field. The method of tissue culture allows the rapid duplication of clean planting materials of vegetative proliferated species for distribution to agriculturists. Genetic engineering or modification-manipulating an organism's genome by initiating or removing particular genes-helps transfer desired traits between plants more rapidly and accurately than is possible in conventional breeding [1-21].

Projections demonstrate that there will be 9 billion people in the world by 2050. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) approximately say we need a 70% expansion in food production from 2005 levels to feed all those people, and we need to grow, harvest, circulate, and consume our food more productively. Our developing population is turning out to be progressively urban: the World Health Organization (WHO) evaluated that out of 10 people 7 members will live in a city by 2050. We’re not getting extra facilities includes land or water, nor are we gaining more farmers [21-30].

As economies keep on improving, the percentage of all populations employed in the agriculture sector declines. The region that will have the biggest population gains, Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia; furthermore have the expanded percentage of their population working in agriculture. This will decrease significantly as their economies progress [31-50].

Advantages Of Technology In Agriculture

Advantages of innovation in agriculture involve speeding up crop production rate and crop quantity, which in turn decrease the expenses of production for farmers and food costs for customers, and even makes crops more nutritious and livestock bigger and meatier. Technology in cultivation creates profits for limited farms and nationwide agricultural procedures alike. These skills comprise using ecologically sound and maintainable agricultural approaches, such as no-till farming, and sophisticated utensils, including biotechnology (Figure 1).

Figure 1: New technology for agriculture.

Indian Agriculture

The Budget of India is seventh-biggest on the earth by formal GDP and the third-largest by getting power equality. The agricultural division is important work in India's economy however donates to a declining part of its GDP (17% in 2013-14). India grades second worldwide in farm productivity. Agronomy and related subdivisions resembling forestry, logging and fishing accounted on behalf of 17% of the GDP plus employed 49% of the overall employees in 2014. It is the prime employment source and an important part of the overall socio-economic improvement of India [51-70].

Technology has transformed cultivating into an existent business, currently agronomists have electrified each method, a customer can submit a request specifically on the web, and the item will be transported from the plantation to the customer in time when it is still fresh. This protects the agriculturalist expenses and it removes mediators who tend to purchase low from farmers and sell high to end consumers. Each farmer utilizes this method as per their convenience. Some people use it to produce fertilizers, some other people uses this technique to market their products, and others use it in manufacturing. Being as a farmer, they have to mention specifically what they need (Figure 2).

Figure 2: The following is a summary on the use of technology in agronomy.

Use of Machines on Farms

Presently an agriculturist can develop on more than 2 acres of land with fewer workforces. The use of planters and farmers creates the method so easy. In agriculture, time and production are so essential; you need to plant in time, harvest in time and transport to provisions in time. Recent agricultural knowledge allows a lesser number of people to cultivate huge amounts of food and fiber in a most limited timeframe [71-80].

Modern Transportation

This aide in making yields existing on markets in time from the farm. With modern transportation, consumers in Dubai will consume new carrots from Africa around the same time that carrot lives the greenery enclosure in Africa. Current transportation innovation facilities help farmers effectively transport fertilizers or other farm items to their farms, and it likewise speeds the supply of horticultural items from farms to the business sectors where shoppers get them regularly [81-83].

Cooling Facilities

These are used by agriculturists to supply tomatoes and other perishable yields to keep them fresh as they transport them to the business sector. These cooling facilities are connected in food transportation trucks, so crops like tomatoes will stay fresh upon conveyance. This is a win-win circumstance for both the customers of these agrarian items and the farmers [83-90].

Genetically Produced Plants

Like potatoes, can oppose sicknesses and pests, which compensates the farmer with great yields and spares them time. These harvests develop quickly and they produce healthy crops. Since these are impervious to most infections and irritations, the rancher will spend less cash on pesticides, which consequently increments on their (RIO) rate of return.

Development of Animal Feeds

This has undertaken the issue of chasing for grass to nourish creatures, now these encourages can be fabricated and devoured by creatures. The cost of this food is reasonable so that a low pay agriculturist can bear the cost of them. The vast majority of these produced creature nourishes have additional sustenance which enhance the creatures wellbeing and the output of these creatures will likewise increment. In farming, the strength of a creature will decide its yield. Ineffectively bolster creatures are constantly unfortunate and they deliver next to no outcomes in type of milk, meet, or hide [91-100].

Breeding of Animals which are Resistant to Diseases

The vast majority of these hereditarily delivered creatures will deliver more drain or hide contrasted with ordinary creatures. This advantages the agriculturist in light of the fact that their generation will be high. Cross reproducing is great in creature brushing; cross breed creatures are more solid and profitable.

Irrigation of Plants

In dry regions like deserts, agriculturists have grasped innovation to flood their products. A decent illustration is in Egypt, were ranchers use water pumps to gather water from streaming Nile to their yields. The majority of these agriculturists develop rice which needs a great deal of water, so they figure out how to develop this rice utilizing watering system techniques improved by cutting edge innovation. Propelled water sprinklers are being utilized to flood huge homesteads and this helps the harvests get enough water which is crucial in their development. A few ranchers blend supplements in this water, so additionally enhances the development of these yields.

References

1. Raja N and Masresha G. Plant Based Biopesticides: Safer Alternative for Organic Food Production. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:128.
2. Bertolini R. "Making Information and Communication Technologies Work for Food Security in Africa".
3. Kalusopa T. "The Challenges of Utilizing Information and Communication Technologies (lCTs) for the Small-scale farmers in Zambia". Library Hi Tech. 2005;43:414-424.
4. Poole ND and Lynch K. "Agricultural market knowledge: Systems for delivery of a private and public good”. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 2003;9:117-126.
5. Rao N. "A framework for implementing information and communication technologies in agricultural development in India". Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2007;74:491-518.
6. Mwakaje G. "Information and Communication Technology for Rural Farmers Market Access in Tanzania". J Informat Technol Impact. 2010;10:111-128.
7. Ali J and Kumar S. "Information and Communication Technologies (lCTs) and Farmers' Decision-making Across the Agricultural Supply Chain". Int J Informat Manag. 2011;31:149-159.
8. Ajani EN. "Promoting the Use of Information and Communication Technologies (lCTs) for Agricultural Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for Policy". J Agri Food Inform. 2014;1:42-53.
9. Munishi PKT. "Analysis of Climate Change and its Impacts on Productive Sectors Particularly Agriculture in Tanzania". Workshop on Prospects for Agricultural Growth in a Changing World. Govt. of Tanzania and World Bank.
10. Apiola M, et al. "Building CS Research Capacity in sub-Saharan Africa by Implementing a Doctoral Training Program". 2015;4:633-638.
11. Chamberlin J. "It's a Small World After All: Defining Smallholder Agriculture in Ghana" in, 2008, International Food Policy Research Institute (lFPRI).
12. Mwalukasa N. "Agricultural information sources used for climate change adaptation in Tanzania". Library Rev. 2013;62:266-292.
13. Lwoga ET. "Bridging the Agricultural Knowledge and Information Divide: the Case of Selected Telecenters and Rural Radio in Tanzania". EJISDC. 2014;43:1-14.
14. Lio M and Liu MC. "ICT and agricultural productivity: evidence from cross-country data". Agri Econom. 2006;34:221-228.
15. "Chamwino District Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan (DEPRP)", 2012.
16. Msaki M, et al. "Cereal Bank as a Necessary Rural Livelihood Institute in Arid Land Makoja Village Dodoma-Tanzania". AEFR. 2013;3:259-269.
17. Human Development Report. The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World, United Nations Development Programme. 2013.
18. Denscombe M. The Good Research Guide for Small-Scale Social Research Projects, Open University Press. 2010.
19. Unwin T. ICT4D: Information and Communication Technology for Development, Cambridge University Press. 2009.
20. Janowsky OT and Awotwi J. "Enabling development through governance and mobile technology". Government Information Quarterly. 2013;30:S32-S45.
21. Parada M and Bull G. "In the fast lane: Innovations in digital finance". The MasterCard Foundation and International Finance Corporation (lFC) Johannesburg South Africa Tech Rep. 2014.
22. Hevner M, et al. "Design science in information systems research". MIS Quarterly. 2004;8:75-105.
23. Cohn M. Agile Estimating and Planning. Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference. 2005.
24. Mangyoku M, et al. "IDeALL: Investigating design-for-all and living-lab methods for engaging users in value co-creation". Engineer Technol Innovation (ICE). 2014;5:1-8.
25. Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2014, Sage Publications.
26. Altenbach JS, et al. Population size of Tadaria brasiliensis at Carlsbad Caverns in 1973. In: Grnoways HH and Baker RJ (eds.) Biological investigations in Guadelupe Mountains National Park, Texas. Natl Park Service Proc Trans Ser No. 1979;4:341.
27. Ambrosi D, et al. Distribution of oxadiazon and phoslone in an aquatic model ecosystem. American Chem Soci. 1979;26:50-53.
28. Andreu V, and Pico’ Y. Determination of pesticides and their degradation products in soil: critical review and comparison of methods. Trends Anal Chem 2004;23:772-789.
29. Arias RN and Fabra PA. Eff ects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on Rhizobium sp. growth and characterization of its transport. Toxicol Lett. 1993;68:267-273.
30. Li T, et al. Effects of Different Carotenoids on Pigmentation of Blood Parrot (Cichlasoma synspilum × Cichlasoma citrinellum). J Aquac Res Dev. 2016;7:414.
31. Dhankar SK, et al. Screening of okra genotypes for resistance to yellow vein mosaic disease. Ann Bio Ludhiana. 1996;12:90-92. 4. Ahmad Z and Patil MS. Screening of okra verities against okra yellow vein mosaic virus. Karnataka J of Agric Sci. 2006;76:123-134.
32. Stover KC and Keyes CR. Forest Fuels and Wildfire Hazard in Two Fire-Excluded Old-Growth Ponderosa Pine Stands: Contrasting Stand-Average Calculations with Measures of Spatial Heterogeneity. J Biodivers Manage Forestry. 2016;5:158.
33. Sajib NH, et al. Vascular Plant Diversity and their Distribution Pattern in Sandwip Island, Chittagong, Bangladesh. J Biodivers Manage Forestry. 2016;5:159.
34. Galeano E, et al. Population Structure and Environmental Effects of a Secondary Forest in the Central Andean Mountains of Eastern Antioquia, Colombia: Emphasis on the Endangered Species Godoya antioquensis. J Biodivers Manage Forestry. 2016;5:160.
35. Srivastava PK, et al. Evaluation of different varieties of okra against yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV). News Lett Nat Hort Res DevlFoun. 1995;15:8-10.
36. Singh JS. Etiology and epidemiology of whitefly transmitted virus disease of okra. Ind Plant Dis Res. 1990;5:64-70.
37. Beruat A, et al. Status of Seagrass Community in Coastal Area in the Kei Besar District of North-East, South-East Maluku Regency. J Aquac Res Development. 2016;7:426.
38. Gupta S and Banerjee S. Food, Feeding Habit and Reproductive Biology of Tire-track Spiny Eel (Mastacembelus armatus): A Review. J Aquac Res Development. 2016;7:429.
39. Sangar RBS. Field reaction of bhindi varieties to yellow vein mosaic virus. Ind J Virol. 1997;13:131-134.
40. Bhagat AP, et al. Rate of dissemination of Okra yellow vein mosaic virus disease in three cultivars of okra. Ind Phytopath. 2001;54:488-489.
41. Ambas I, et al. Survival and Immunity of Marron Cherax cainii (Austin, 2002) Fed Bacillus mycoides Supplemented Diet under Simulated Transport. J Aquac Res Development. 2016;7:390.
42. Andrewartha SJ, et al. Aquaculture Sentinels: Smart-farming with Biosensor Equipped Stock. J Aquac Res Development. 2016;7:393.
43. Topp-Jørgensen E, et al. Community-based monitoring of natural resource use and forest quality in montane forests and miombo woodlands of Tanzania. Biodiversity & Conservation. 2005;14:2653-2677.
44. Danielsen F, et al. Does monitoring matter? A quantitative assessment of management decisions from locally-based monitoring of protected areas. Biodiver Conser. 2005;14:2633-2652.
45. Varadharajan D and Soundarapandian P. Biodiversity and Abundance of Phytoplankton from Muthupettai Mangrove Region, South East Coast of India. J Aquac Res Devlopment. 2015;6:383.
46. Qambrani GR, et al. Reproductive Biology of Glossogobius giuris (Hamilton), in Manchar Lake Sindh, Pakistan. J Aquac Res Devlopment. 2016;7:392.
47. Humphries F. Patenting Genetic Material in Aquaculture: A Red Herring or an Emerging Issue to Tackle? J Aquac Res Development. 2016;7:394.
48. Mokhtar DM, et al. Light and Scanning Electron Microscopic Studies on the Intestine of Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella): II-Posterior Intestine. J Aquac Res Development. 2015;6:380.
49. Mohideen M and Haniffa MA. Effect of Probiotic on Microbiological and Haematological Responsiveness of Cat fish (Heteropnuestes fossilis) Challenged with Bacteria Aeromonas hydrophila and Fungi Aphanomyces invadans. J Aquac Res Development. 2015;6:384.
50. Willoughby PR. The Middle and Later Stone Age in the Iringa Region of southern Tanzania. Quaternary International. 2012;270:103-118.
51. Lund JF and Treue T. Are we getting there? Evidence of decentralized forest management from the Tanzanian Miombo woodlands. World Development. 2008;36:2780-2800.
52. Tongco MDC. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications. 2007;5:147-158.
53. Zeller M, et al. Statistical sampling frame and methods used for the selection of villages and households in the scope of the research program on Stability of Rainforest Margins in Indonesia (STORMA). 2002; Discussion Paper Series sub-program A No. 1.
54. Eisapour M, et al. Comparative Radular Morphology in Some Intertidal Gastropods along Hormozgan Province, Iran. J Aquac Res Development. 2015;6:322.
55. Kritsanapuntu S and Chaitanawisuti N. Use of Tuna-Cooking Liquid Effluent as a Dietary Protein and Lipid Source Replacing Fishmeal in Formulated Diets for Growing Hatchery-Reared Juvenile Spotted Babylon (Babylonia areolata). J Aquac Res Development. 2015;6:323.
56. Kritsanapuntu S and Chaitanawisuti N. Replacement of Fishmeal by Poultry By-Product Meal in Formulated Diets for Growing Hatchery–Reared Juvenile Spotted Babylon (Babylonia areolata). J Aquac Res Development. 2015;6:324.
57. Hasan I and Goswami MM. Genetic Variation among Cat Fish (Mystus vittatus) Population Assessed by Randomly Amplified Polymorphic (RAPD) Markers from Assam, India. J Aquac Res Development. 2015;6:326
58. Budiyono and Kusworo TD. Microalgae for stabilizing biogas production from cassava starch wastewater Internat. J Waste Resour. 2012;2:17-21.
59. Sameera V, et al. Current strategies involved in biofuel production from plants and algae. J Microbial Biochem Technol. 2011;R1:002.
60. Hong JW, et al. (2016) Mass cultivation from a Korean raceway pond system of indigenous microalgae as potential biofuel feedstock. Oil Gas Res. 2016;2:108.
61. Ryther JH and Dunstan WM. Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Eutrophication in the coastal marine environment. Sci. 1971;171:1008-1013.
62. Lin MC. Marine environmental protection: a highly efficient method of degradation of heavy oil pollution on coastal beaches. Hydrol Current. 2016;Res 7:231.
63. Richir J and Gobert S. Trace elements in marine environments: occurrence, threats and monitoring with special focus on the coastal mediterranean. J Environ Anal Toxicol. 2016;6:349.
64. Carrilho ENVM and Gilberta TR. Assessing metal sorption on the marine alga Pilayellalittoralis. J Environ Monit. 2001;2:410-415.
65. Jagerroos S and Krause PR. Rigs-to-reef; Impact or enhancement on marine biodiversity. J Ecosys Ecograph. 2016;6:187.
66. Oger PM. Methanization of fossil fuel: a possible sustainable future energy source for mankind? Ferment Technol. 2012;1:110.
67. Pfenninger S and Keirstead J. Renewables, nuclear, or fossil fuels? Scenarios for Great Britain’s power system considering costs, emissions and energy security. Appl Ener. 2015;152:83-93.
68. Huaman RNE and Lourenco S. A Review on: CO2 capture technology on fossil fuel power plant. J Fundam Renew Energy Appl. 2015;5:164.
69. Sai Gireesha P and Satish V. Dependence on biofuels as an alternative source of fossil fuels. Res Rev J Bot Sci. 2015;4:1-3.
70. Parihar VS, et al. Shallow marine trace fossils from mandai formation of the barmer basin, DistrictJaisalmer, Western Rajasthan, India. J Ecosys Ecograph. 2016;6:189.
71. Vassilev SV and Vassileva CG. Composition, properties and challenges of algae biomass for biofuel application: An overview. Fuel. 2016;181:1-33.
72. Michael K, et al. Removal efficiency of total petroleum hydrocarbons from water by Pseudomonas aeruginosa a case of Lake Albert, Uganda. J Bioremed Biodeg. 2016;7:337.
73. Dasari S. Effects of petroleum products & environmental change. Res and Rev J Engg Tech. 2015;4:35- 38.
74. Patade VY, et al. PEG treatment improves germination and establishment in older seeds of Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz): a potential biofuel crop. Res & Rev J Bot Sci. 2016;S2:26-28. 27. Ramakrishnan AM, Biofuel: a scope for reducing global warming. J Pet Environ Biotechnol. 2015;7:1-6.
75. Lewis Liu Z and Wang X, A reference model system of industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is needed for development of the next-generation biocatalyst toward advanced biofuels production. J Microb Biochem Technol. 2015;7:125.
76. Sticklen MB, et al. Towards cellulosic biofuels evolution: using the petro-industry model. Adv Crop Sci Tech. 2014;2:131.
77. Morales G, et al. Advanced biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass. J Adv Chem Eng. 2014;4:101.
78. Cosnier S, et al. Recent advances on enzymatic glucose/oxygen and hydrogen/oxygen biofuel cells: achievements and limitations. J Pow Sour. 2016;325:252–263.
79. Pelletier E, et al. Biofouling growth in cold estuarine waters and evaluation of some chitosan and copper anti-fouling paints. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10:3209-3223.
80. Dong T, et al. Lipid recovery from wet oleaginous microbial biomass for biofuel: a critical review. App Ener. 2016;177:879-895.
81. Shah Z, et al. Using GC-MS to analyze bio-oil produced from pyrolysis of agricultural wastes - discarded soybean frying oil, coffee and eucalyptus sawdust in the Presence of 5% Hydrogen and Argon. J Anal Bioanal Tech. 2016;7:2-7
82. Mo J, et al. Experimental investigation on the effect of n-butanol blending on spray characteristics of soybean biodiesel in a common-rail fuel injection system. Fuel. 2016;182:391-401,
83. Emire SA and Buta MB. Effects of fermentation on the nutritional quality of QPM and soybean blends for the production of weaning food. J Food Process Technol. 2015;6:2-6.
84. Venteris ER, et al. Regional algal biofuel production potential in the coterminous United States as affected by resource availability trade-offs. Algal Res. 2014;5:215-225.
85. Unkefer CJ, et al. Review of the algal biology program within the national alliance for advanced biofuels and bioproducts. Algal Res. 2016;11.
86. Sekhon KK and Rahman PKSM. Synthetic biology: a Promising technology for biofuel production. J Pet Environ Biotechnol. 2013;4:121.
87. Fakhri M, et al. Comparing the potential of hydrocarbon generation of kazhdomi and pabdeh formations in bangestan anticline (Zagros Basin) according to rock-eval pyrolysis data. J Earth Sci Clim Change. 2013;4:157.
88. Maiyappan S, et al. Isolation, Evaluation and Formulation of Selected Microbial Consortia for Sustainable Agriculture. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2010;2:109.
89. Bengston M, et al. Chlorpyrifos-methyl plus bioresmethrin; Methacrifos; Pirimiphos-methyl plus bioresmethrin; and synergised bioresmethrin as grain protectants for wheat. Pesticide Sci. 1980;11:61-76.
90. Hartmans KJ, et al. The use of carvone in agriculture, sprout suppression of potatoes and antifungal activity against potato tuber and other plant diseases. Ind Crop Prod. 1995;4:3-13.
91. Mondal K and Port GR. Pheromones of Tribolium spp. and their potential in pest management. Agricul Zool Rev. 1994;6:121-148.
92. Karunaratne SH and Hemingway J. Malathion resistance and prevalence of the malathion carboxylesterase mechanism in populations of mosquito vectors of disease in Sri Lanka. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:1060-1064.
93. French RC. The bioregulatory action of flavour compounds on fungal spores and other propagules. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1985;23:173-199.
94. Tang S. Developing and Analysing Pest-natural Enemy Systems with IPM Strategies. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2012;3:101.
95. Al-shannaf HM, et al. Toxic and Biochemical Effects of Some Bioinsecticides and Igrs on American Bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (hüb.) (noctuidae: lepidoptera) in Cotton Fields. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2012;3:118.
96. Pindi PK. Liquid Microbial Consortium for Soil Health. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2012;3:102.
97. Brar SK, et al. Biopesticides - Road to Agricultural Recovery. J Biofert Biopest. 2012;3:103.
98. Torres JB. Insecticide Resistance in Natural Enemies - Seeking for Integration of Chemical and Biological Controls. J Biofert Biopest. 2012;3:104.
99. El-Darier SM, et al. Detoxification of Olive-mill Solid Waste and its Probable Application as Organic Fertilizer. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:154.
100. Sane SA and Mehta SK. Isolation and Evaluation of Rock Phosphate Solubilizing Fungi as Potential Biofertilizer. J Biofertil Biopestici. 2015;6:156.