ISSN ONLINE(2319-8753)PRINT(2347-6710)

Yakışıklı erkek tatil için bir beldeye gidiyor burada kendisine türk Porno güzel bir seksi kadın ayarlıyor Onunla beraber otel odasına gidiyorlar Otel odasına rokettube giren kadın ilk önce erkekle sohbet ederek işi yavaş halletmeye çalışıyor sex hikayeleri Kocası fabrikatör olan sarışın Rus hatun şehirden biraz uzak olan bir türk porno kasabaya son derece lüks bir villa yaptırıp yerleşiyor Kocasını işe gönderip mobil porno istediği erkeği eve atan Rus hatun son olarak fotoğraf çekimi yapmak üzere türk porno evine gelen genç adamı bahçede azdırıyor Güzel hatun zengin bir iş adamının porno indir dostu olmayı kabul ediyor Adamın kendisine aldığı yazlık evde sikiş kalmaya başlayan hatun bir süre sonra kendi erkek arkadaşlarını bir bir çağırarak onlarla porno izle yapıyor Son olarak çağırdığı arkadaşını kapıda üzerinde beyaz gömleğin açık sikiş düğmelerinden fışkıran dik memeleri ile karşılayıp içeri girer girmez sikiş dudaklarına yapışarak sevişiyor Evin her köşesine yayılan inleme seslerinin eşliğinde yorgun düşerek orgazm oluyor

Analysis of Bumper Beam in Frontal collision

Lande P.R 1, Patil R.V. 2
  1. P.G. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, SITS, Narhe Pune Unversity, Maharashtra, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, SITS, Narhe Pune Unversity, Maharashtra,India
Related article at Pubmed, Scholar Google

Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology

Abstract

Aluminium Honeycomb sandwich panel is structure which has very sleight to weight ratio. Its main application in past observed in aerospace ,marine and high end automobile sector This structure can effectively used to eliminate one major drawback in Indian passenger car which is Pedestrian damage .By reference of test conducted by Euro NCAP we are having data the major passenger car which is day today part of life have fail in safety measure of European countries.

Keywords

Sandwich structure, , Impact Analysis.

INTRODUCTION

Honeycomb sandwich structure basically consist of a core, which is basically sandwiched between the two face sheet upper and lower face sheet.. In this structure we have option to select material for upper face sheet ,lower face sheet and for core material{1} .This structures property depend upon the geometry of the core such as cell shape ,which is basic unit of core, height of core, thickness of foil from which cell is prepared. Face sheet thickness also major contribute in properties. We can obtain desired effect by changing any one parameter.{2} For pedestrian damage we have to focus on front side bumper of car .In Indian low cost car the material used for bumper is steel .Bumper is part which come most in deformation zone, so crashworthiness of bumper should increase.
The objective of this work is to identify, the best material for bumper reinforcement which will ensure passenger safety, with high strength to weight ratio through static impact analysis .Using different engineering material like aluminium honeycomb sandwich and fly ash aluminium.
image

II LITERATURE REVIEW

First three paper in reference focuses on honeycomb structure Hexel is big bull in composite market and large shre in honeycomb manufacturing. Paper no second focuses about hoe material properties of honeycomb by different theories can be calculated. Third paper is mot important as describes honeycomb equivalent plate theory. the three layer structure can be converted in to one layer and treated as isotropic. Author v.Kleisner and R.Zerik in his paper (4) Analyses the car bumper reinforcement made of composite(EHKF420-UD24K-400).In methodology section they described RCAR test..The test vehicle speed is 15km/he within 1 meter distance from the barrier. The barrier offset of the vehicle is40%.in paper no. (.5) brief description regarding FMVSS215 is mentioned. It also shows that speed for low velocity impact is 5 Km/hr. In paper no.6 design and manufacturing of car bumper is by hand layup method is described .material used is glass fibre reinforced polymer Charpy impact test is used to validate the result for energy absorption capacity of material. by studying paper no.7 we know just addition hexagonal honeycomb structure made cardboard increases energy absorption capacity by 260%.in paper no .8 we can see comparison of composite GMT( Glass material Thermoplastics) and steel .They suggest to used GMT as backbone behind steel as energy absorber.

III.METHODOLOGY

The 3D model of bumper reinforcement is made in creo.2 After this the same model is imported in to ANSYS workbench for impact analysis and total deformation is observed. We are applied here condition for impact is low velocity condition which 8 km/hr( 2.2m/s) {5} and mass 1000 kg. In100% frontal impact force component is perpendicular to the bumper beam. This test is conducted to check pedestrian safety purpose .Now by using Newtons second law, we calculated force value which is 22000 N .This point force applied centrally on Bumper beam.The Fixed support Applied at the end portion which is attached to the chassis in real condition. This condition is according to NCAP..

IV MATERIAL SELECTION

Three types of material is selected for bumper mainly following specification:
image
As Aluminium honeycomb sandwich is anisotropic material having different properties in different crystal direction. We assumed it as orthotropic and applied The equivalent plate theory and make it as homogenous plate having only one young’s modulus .As these are assumption for fast analysis results are approximate and should be verified by practical impact test.{3}
image

V RESULT AND DISCUSSION

image
Figure No. 2 shows the deformation value for steel bumper beam which is we have considered as solid but in real practice it is hollow bumper beam. Maximum deformation we can observe is 0.17 mm .here we have provided end support as well as central support.
image
Figure No. 3 shows the deformation value for Aluminium Honeycomb sandwich composite bumper beam which is we have considered as isotopic solid material but in real practice it is anisotropic layered material. Maximum deformation we can observe is 0.15 mm .Here we have provided end support as well as central support.
image
Figure No. 4 shows the deformation value for Fly Ash Aluminium bumper beam l Maximum deformation we can observe is 3.5 mm .Here we have provided end support as well as central support
image
By observing above result we can predict that we can replace steel by other two material .By seeing space required for other accessories behind reinforcement ,we can increase thickness of bumper reinforcement.

References

1) J.Kindeger “Lightweight Structural Cores” Hexel Composites 1999.

2) C.W.Schwingshackl; G.S.Aglietti; “Determination Of Honeycomb Material Properties: Existing Theories And An Alternative Dynamic Approach” DOI: 10.1061/_ASCE_0893-1321_2006_19:3_177.

3) Li-Juan,Jin Xian-ding,WANg Yang-Bao ,”The Equivalent Analysis of honeycomb sandwich plates for satellite structure.” XIA.structural Mechanics Institutes ,shanghai 20030,china

4) “Kleisner,R.Zemcik”,”Analysis of composite car bumper reinforcement.”..Faculty of applied sciences .University Of weat bohemia. Czech Republic,2009.

5) .”P.Bhasker ,”Impact Analysis of car bumper using carbon Fiber reinforcement PEI and S2 glass materials by solid works software”, ISSN 2321- 6905,2014

6) “s.prabhakaran”,Design and fbrication of composite bumper for light passenger vehicle”,IJMER.,Vol:2,Issue 4,,july- August 2011. 7) “Saeed Abu Alyazed Albatlan”,” Improvement impact Resistance for front Automotive Bumper “Higher Technological Institute ,Cairo Egypt European Scientific Journal vol:9 june 2013

8) A.R. Mortazavi Moghaddam and M.T.Ahmadian “ Design And Analysis of Automobile bumper with the capacity of Energy Release using GMT materials.”World Academy of science ,Engineering and Technology.Vol:5,2011-04-25.

9) Jeom Kee Paik,, Anil K. Thayamballi, Gyu Sung Kim“The strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels” Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University, Pusan 609-735, South Korea Thin-Walled Structures 35 (1999) 205–231