ISSN: 2320-2459

Department of Physics, University of Calicut, Kerala, India

- *Corresponding Author:
- Rethika KT

Department of Physics

University of Calicut, Kerala, India**Tel:**9496961065

**E-mail:**rethikasurendran@gmail.com

**Received Date**: 04/10/2017; **Accepted Date:** 02/11/2017; **Published Date**: 07/11/2017

**Visit for more related articles at** Research & Reviews: Journal of Pure and Applied Physics

This paper reports an attractive force between ions that are shielded by degenerate electrons in high density strongly coupled quantum plasma. The electric potential around an isolated ion has hard core negative part that looks like the Lennard-Jones (LJ) type potential. The new attractive potential is attributed to the quantum Bohm potential within hydrodynamic approach. Here the electron exchange and electron correlations are not considered. The negative potential is responsible for the attraction of ions forming lattices and atoms/molecules also for critical point and phase transition in high density SCQ plasma at nano scales.

Strongly coupled plasma; Quantum plasma; Screening

Shielding of electric charge generated by free charges in plasma is a primary issue in plasma physics. A test charged particle immersed in plasma will be shielded out by either ions or the electrons. The Debye potential φ (r) [1-5] arises due to the distribution of charges within the plasma. The knowledge of potential distribution predicts how a cloud of opposite polarity charges will shield a test charge particle over a certain radius. Recently Shukla and Eliasson discovered an oscillating shielded Coulomb potential also referred to as the Shukla Eliasson attractive potential around a stationary test ion in an un magnetized quantum plasma [6]. The attractive potential obtained from the continuity and momentum equations for degenerate electrons in dense quantum plasma depends on the electron number density of the plasma. These studies were based on the generalized quantum hydro dynamical (GQHD) equations [7]. The generalized electron momentum equation in the GQHD model includes the quantum statistical pressure and quantum forces due to electron tunneling through the quantum Bohm potential [8], spin magnetization of Bohr electrons as well as the electron exchange and correlation effects due to the electron spin [9]. The dynamics of the degenerate electrons in dense quantum plasmas is controlled by the electromagnetic and quantum forces. The profile of the quantum plasma potential resembles the Lennard-Jones potential in atomic gases [6,10].

Consider a quantum plasma in presence of non-relativistic degenerate electron fluids and mildly coupled ions that are immobile and form the neutralizing background. Here the generalized electron momentum equation in GQHD model includes the pressure which is derived from the asymptotic formula for the ground state energy of high density quantum electro dynamic plasma. Here the electron exchange and correlation effects due to the electron spin are not considered in the momentum equation.

The thermo dynamical properties of dusty plasma are determined by the Coulomb coupling parameter. For strongly coupled
plasma, the coupling parameter Γ ≥ 1. For strongly coupled plasma; the results of thermal agitation between particles are
comparable to their electrostatic interaction. This will give rise to both short-range and long-range order. The long range order
arises from the screened Coulomb forces and the short range order is associated to the repulsion of the charged particles due
to their finite size. This brings the strongly coupled plasma system in a regime which is intermediate between an ideal gas and a
solid [11,12]. Strongly coupled plasma has more in common with the liquid than a weekly coupled plasma. The high and low density
limit behavior of strongly coupled plasma is different from that observed in molecular systems. In high density regime, atoms
and molecules becomes localized in a lattice structure whose zero point vibrations are small. For very light electrons, localization
forces the particles to have a large momentum fluctuations and which correspond to a high kinetic energy. The total energy
might be higher than in the electron gas state in which the division of the two forms of energy might be better balanced. A phase transi tion from the low density lattice state to the high density gas state occur at, where r_{0} is the mean inter particle distance or Wigner-Seitz radius, related to the density and is the Bohr radius, [13]. The limiting unperturbed
state is that of the perfect Fermi gas at high densities. Electron correlation and exchange terms become important with decrease in density. The resultant expansion for ground state energy in the high density (small rs) regime gives:

(1)

Where, . This asymptotic expansion was interpolated by Isihara and Montroll through the method of Pade approximants [14].

For strongly coupled quantum plasma, (2)

Pressure, (3)

Quantum hydrodynamics has a wide range of applicability in the framework of semiconductor physics, molecular systems, metallic nanoparticles, thin metal films and in nuclear physics [15]. The quantum fluid model has been applied to several problems involving charged particle systems such as the description of quantum diodes in degenerate plasmas and quantum ion acoustic waves in carbon nanotubes. The model has also been applied to dense astrophysical plasmas and high grain free electron lasers [16].

The GQHD equations are,

(9)

(5)

(6)

Here the Quantum Bohm potential, Letting n=n_{0}+n_{1}, where n_{1}<<n0. Linearize the resultant equations to
obtain the density perturbation n1 that can be inserted in to eqn. (6). The Fourier transformation in space leads to the electric
potential around an isolated ion. Thus we have:

(7)

Where D is the dielectric constant, r denotes the position relative to the instantaneous position of the test charge.

The inverse Dielectric constant can be written as:

(8)

Where is the inverse Thomas Fermi screening length and measures the importance of quantum recoil effect and .

, at n=n0 can be calculated by using eqns. (1)-(3).

(9)

Inserting eqn. (8) in (7),

(10)

where,

and

The above integral was evaluated for different values of α. The boundary condition is

Eqn. (10) becomes:

(11)

(12)

(13)

For α =1,

(14)

Where

For α >>1, We get the exponential cosine screened potential [17]:

(15)

Where

In **Figure 1**, the profiles of the potential given by the eqns. (13)-(15) for different values of α are displayed. It can be seen that
the new short range attractive electric potential that resembles the LJ type potential for α=10 while for the smaller values of α the
attractive potential vanishes. In high density strongly coupled plasma, with Bohm potential, the attractive potential exists only for
α ≥ 1. From **Figure 2**, it is clear that the attractive potential increases with increase in α values till α=10. After that the attractive
potential decreases and reaches to 0 as α increases.

The electron exchange and correlation effects are not considered in this work. Pressure is derived from the asymptotic formula for the ground state energy of high density quantum plasma. These are the differences from the work of Shukla and Eliasson. The appearance of the new attractive force may be due to the density perturbations associated with the statistical pressure and due to the tunneling of degenerate electrons through the Bohm potential by overlapping electron wave functions [6,10]. The linear response theory for quasi-stationary electrostatic perturbations involving immobile ions reveals that the electric potential around an isolated ion in a quantum plasma resembles the Lennard Jones type potential [6,10]. Thus the newly found electric potential have a short range negative hard core electric potential.

- Chen FE. Introduction to plasma physics and controlled fusion.1984;1.
- BellanP. Fundamentals of plasma Physics. Cambridge University Press. 2008.
- BrandF. Plasma Physics. School of physics. University of Sidney NSW. 2006.
- James DC. Fundamentals of plasma Physics. University of Wisconsin. Madison. 2006.
- Porter WJ. Lectures in Plasma Physics, Chicago, Illinois. 1979.
- Shukla PKand EliassonB. Novel Attractive Force Between Ions in Quantum Plasmas. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108.
- CrouseillesN, et al. Quantum hydrodynamic model for the nonlinear electron dynamics in thin metal films. Phys Rev B. 2008;78:155412.
- Gardner CL and RinghoferC. Smooth quantum potential for the hydrodynamic model. Phys Rev E. 1996;53:157.
- ShuklaPK, et al. Stimulated scattering of Electromagnetic waves carrying orbital angular momentum in quantum plasmas. Phys Rev E.2012;86:016403.
- Shukla PK and Eliasson B. New aspects of collective phenomena at nanoscales in quantum plasmas. Frontiers of Fundamental Physics and Physics Education Research. 2014;145:259-274.
- Khalfaoui AH and Bennaceur-DoumazD. Statistical Thermodynamics of strongly coupled plasma. 2004.
- ChenYC, et al. Electron screening and kinetic energy oscillations in a strongly coupled plasma. PhysRevLett.2004;93:265003.
- Sineeba R, et al.SCQGP in Quark stars. Eur Phys JC. 2012.
- Isihara and montroll. Ground state energy of interacting electrons. Proc. Nat. acad. Sci. USA. 1971;68.
- Anirban B and JanakiMS. Construction of a more complete quantum fluid model from Wigner-Boltzmann equation with all higher order quantum corrections. 2015.
- Shukla PK and Eliasson B. Inverse third power law for the shielding of test particles. Phys. Lett. A. 2008;372:2897.
- Shukla PK and Eliasson B. Clustering of ions at atomic dimensions in quantum plasmas. physics.plasm-ph. 2012.