Comprehensive Analysis of Opioid Misuse among Diverse Youth Populations in the Context of Systemic Inequities: Multifaceted Intersections of Race, Socioeconomic Status and Health Disparities

Abstract

The article delves into the pressing matter of minority youth opioid misuse by examining how inequalities based on race and economic status impact the concerning trend within society's younger minority populations. Analysis reveals that minority youth from underserved communities are at a risk of misuse due to financial challenges, racial discrimination in healthcare environments and disparities in addiction care accessibility. The article stresses the significance of factors, like neighborhood safety and family dynamics in influencing substance abuse patterns while also underscoring the need for culturally aware prevention methods and community based interventions to tackle opioid misuse effectively. Moreover by acknowledging and tackling these differences the article supports policies that aim to ensure fairness in healthcare and education systems to foster nurturing surroundings for at risk minority youth communities.

Keywords

Health disparities; Substance use; Cultural competency; Economic stability; Access to healthcare; Youth engagement; Prevention strategies

Introduction

The concerning issue of misuse, among youth sheds light on significant health inequalities that reflect underlying systemic disparities in our society. These disparities, evident among racial and socioeconomic groups are influenced by a combination of factors such as race, economic status and various demographic variables. Research suggests that differing practices in prescribing opioids based on race and ethnicity can exacerbate existing health inequities [1]. Furthermore, studies have revealed a connection between misuse of prescription opioids among youths and negative health outcomes including engaging in behaviors like alcohol consumption and substance use [2]. To address these problems more effectively it is imperative to comprehend how key determinants such as circumstances, access to education and community environments contribute to inequities in use. For instance, social determinants significantly impact ethnic disparities in type 2 diabetes among young individuals [3].

Additionally, research has shown high rates of opioid abuse among American and Indian teenagers compared to other populations [4]. Further investigations into family dynamics have indicated that inadequate parental supervision and warmth are linked to levels of prescription opioid misuse in teenagers [5]. Studies focusing on disparities in prescriptions and patient monitoring for chronic opioid therapy underscore differences, in postoperative opioid prescribing practices and risk evaluation [6-8]. The below table categorizes various social, healthcare access and environmental factors that contribute to opioid use. Specific factors within each category highlight the complexities of their impact, including increased risk of substance experimentation, limited access to treatment and the prevalence of high-drug use environments, ultimately shaping opioid use patterns in this demographic (Table 1).

Table 1. Factors influencing opioid use among minority youth populations.

Materials and Methods

Health disparities

The disparities, of opioid use among individuals especially concerning ethnic background, economic status and other demographic factors present complex and significant challenges. Studies indicate that minority youth, such as those from hispanic communities have a higher tendency to misuse opioids due to factors including economic hardship, influences from pharmaceutical marketing and unequal access to healthcare services for addiction treatment and pain management [1]. These disparities often stem from injustices leading to barriers to care for marginalized groups [3]. Research suggests that the differences in receiving pain treatment for youth add complexity to our understanding of pain and opioid misuse among adolescents emphasizing the link between pain management and opioid misuse [9]. Additionally, the racial disparities in physical wellbeing and quality of life during adolescence underscore the importance of implementing culturally specific interventions targeting health inequalities among adolescents [10]. Racial bias in medical settings connects experiences with opioid medication misuse, acting as the underlying basis for variations in opioid use [11]. Implementing strategies like improving monitoring systems and follow up treatment approaches is one way to address disparities, in pain management [8].

Risk exposure: The impact of social disadvantages, on minority youth is significant, leading to inequalities in substance use and health outcomes. Living in areas with high rates of drug use and limited opportunities for employment can increase the likelihood of substance use initiation and dependence among minority youth [12]. These challenges are exacerbated by barriers to accessing care resulting in more severe health issues among homeless youth [13]. Additionally institutional barriers like racial discrimination limit job prospects for minority teenagers widening disparities in status and academic success [14]. Negative school experiences and nonconformity to gender norms are associated with outcomes in adolescents underscoring the influence of social determinants on juvenile well-being [15]. Moreover, many minority youths reside in communities facing poverty, housing difficulties, a lack of facilities and transportation options which contribute to health issues and substance abuse problems [16]. Factors such as proximity to resources, personal safety perceptions, facility availability and costs play a role in youth participation in physical activities highlighting the importance of accessible resources for promoting overall health [17]. The misuse of prescription opioids among youth is a concern due to its potential link, to future heroin use [18]. Limited availability of transportation and recreational facilities, in neighborhoods can exacerbate differences in substance use and mental health outcomes among people [19].

Access to healthcare: There are variations among racial and ethnic minority youth with regards to healthcare access. Black children and teenagers face challenges and struggle to find healthcare providers [20,21]. Referrals play a role in addressing health disparities among different racial groups with variations observed between latinos, non-latino whites and non-latino blacks [22]. Ethnic minority women encounter obstacles in accessing healthcare services impacting their utilization of care [23]. Additionally social factors and air pollution contribute to health gaps that may impede minority community’s access to assistance [24].

Treatment outcomes: Studies indicate that minority adolescents are less likely to obtain care based on guidelines, experience under treatment for pain and often face stigma from their communities and healthcare professionals [9]. Studies show that minority youth are less likely to receive prescriptions for pain when reporting higher levels of pain. Variations in prescription rates have been noted based on age and race [9]. Additionally, treatments like agonist therapy have proven to be impactful in terms of retention and cost efficiency compared to approaches focused on abstinence [25]. Strategies to improve compliance to opioid therapy guidelines and reducing misuse have been explored in primary care settings, including the importance of following care guidelines and monitoring refills [26]. Initiatives targeting the connection of individuals to treatment after overdoses particularly through better access to medication-based therapies are considered urgent priorities [27]. Research also stresses the need for youth centered approaches, in both prevention and treatment efforts aimed at addressing use among urban youth populations [28].

Socioeconomic factors: Jobs, for inexperienced and underage workers are often unstable. Unemployment places young people at risk of exploitation which can impact their physical and mental wellbeing [29]. Providing youth with the ability and opportunities can empower them to contribute to society. However, they continue to encounter problems such as poverty and absent fathers which may lead them to engage in behaviors like substance abuse [30]. Early experimentation with substances has been associated with an increased likelihood of developing substance use disorders in adulthood [31]. Substance misuse is an issue among young adults living in urban areas with limited resources as it may be a way for them to cope with stress or trauma in their environment [32]. Youth from diverse backgrounds may not receive adequate support for education due to a lack of encouragement from family, friends and peers regarding the benefits of schooling [33]. While many Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBTQ) youth show resilience the impact of homophobia and discrimination based on orientation can increase health disparities resulting in higher rates of depression, suicidality, substance abuse and sexually transmitted infections [34]. Qualitative studies have revealed that young individuals, in Northern Ontario who engage in the misuse of nonprescription drugs encounter obstacles like limited services, lack of motivation, social stigma, lengthy wait times and transportation difficulties when seeking treatment [35]. The correlation between neighborhood disadvantages and teenage substance abuse along with any ethnic variations in this connection has not been extensively explored despite the impact of neighborhood features on youth misconduct [36]. To tackle the disparities in health outcomes linked to use among people, a comprehensive and diverse approach is important. Policies and initiatives should be culturally aware and address health determinants at both community levels. By addressing these issues, targeted strategies can be developed to notably lessen health discrepancies. Research on ways to access health services for youth can offer insights into streamlining accessibility through public health promotion campaigns [37]. Recognizing barriers to healthcare access for teenagers is vital in creating a holistic approach to tackle systemic hurdles [38]. Ensuring availability of quality youth integrated services delivered by trained healthcare professionals is essential, for meeting the sexual and reproductive health needs of adolescents [39]. To tackle the impact of factors, on health and disparities in conditions like type 2 diabetes among young individuals it's important to take a holistic approach that addresses broader healthcare inequality issues [3]. Tailoring family planning services for youth and addressing healthcare disparities are important in promoting reproductive health among young people [40]. Recognizing and tackling the inequalities in healthcare access for gender minority youth is vital to reducing health inequities [41]. Moreover understanding the challenges faced by certain language speakers with neurodevelopmental disorders can help shape policies and guidelines to support these communities [42]. Research into the healthcare preferences of (LGBTQ+) youth can guide health interventions to address stigma and financial obstacles to care [43]. Additionally addressing healthcare usage and obstacles for individuals post detention is essential to ensure they can access healthcare services [44].

Social factors influencing opioid use

Social determinants have an effect on the health outcomes and quality of life of people. Social factors play a role in youth opioid use particularly among minority communities.

Economic stability: Economic stability is a determinant, with poverty, unemployment and limited access to quality education being contributors. These challenges disproportionately affect minority groups making them more susceptible to substance abuse [45,46]. Studies have revealed that racial and ethnic minorities face obstacles in completing addiction treatment programs due to many reasons, underscoring the importance of addressing these barriers for treatment outcomes [47,48]. Understanding how economic hardships influence use and the connection between neighborhood socioeconomic status and opioid prescribing practices can elucidate the disparities in opioid use across different racial and ethnic groups [49-53]. Furthermore, tackling the physical environments that contribute to discrepancies can help alleviate health inequities [54-57]. To address healthcare disparities based on race it is essential to shift the focus from patients to providers to ensure care delivery [58]. Additionally, interventions like drama based education programs show promise in encouraging participation, in substance abuse prevention efforts among ethnic communities [59].

Education: To ensure that substance use education is culturally sensitive and inclusive it is important to customize efforts to effectively connect with communities. Educational campaigns should highlight the importance of storage and proper disposal of medications to prevent misuse among young individuals [60]. Following an overdose incident, timely addiction treatment, including health services and pharmacotherapy should be prioritized to enhance treatment outcomes [61]. Enhancing self-efficacy and promoting competence, among healthcare professionals can be achieved by increasing cultural competency through tailored education programs that cater to specific cultural needs [62,63]. It is vital to integrate competency education into pharmacy curricula and healthcare programs to meet the needs of patients from different backgrounds [63,64]. Educators across fields, should also emphasize the significance of cultural competence in effectively engaging with diverse populations [63-65]. Interventions aimed at youth should focus on raising awareness about substance use and related risks offering a range of youth centric service options and implementing harm reduction strategies to combat the crisis among young individuals [66]. Providing education on opioid medication safety is key, in equipping teenagers with the knowledge needed to make informed decisions [67]. Understanding the needs of people struggling with use and focusing on their internal drive can help improve their willingness to engage in treatment [68]. Ongoing efforts to reduce the stigma, around substance abuse conversations and address obstacles in helping individuals with addictions and opioid use disorders require attention to privacy, time, training and education [69,70]. By seeking input from people, families and healthcare providers on how to tackle the crisis collaboratively we can better assist youth in accessing the right services and support [71].

Social and community context: When it comes to drug education and prevention programs it's essential to embrace approaches that recognize and respect the diverse norms within communities, peer influences and family backgrounds related to substance use among different racial and ethnic groups. Studies have indicated that susceptibility to peer pressure is associated with increased substance use, externalized behaviors and risky behaviors among teenagers [72]. Implementing peer-led programs focused on substance abuse prevention within circles can amplify peer influences and encourage healthier choices [73]. Various factors that impact substance use, such as relationships between parents and adolescents, peer pressure, access to substances and spirituality differ based on contexts [74,75]. These factors play a role in shaping behaviors related to substance use. Peer pressure and psychosocial stress are known to be risk factors for both the start and recurrence of substance abuse [76]. It is important to understand family dynamics, including family ties, limited parental involvement and a history of drug involvement among family members to identify families at risk and establish effective prevention strategies [76]. Educational programs focusing on peer pressure, student living arrangements and family background have been proven to influence substance abuse patterns among college students [77]. The influence of peer pressure, lack of supervision and dormitory living conditions on susceptibility to drug abuse highlights the need to address social factors in prevention initiatives [78]. Family attitudes towards drugs, academic pressures, peer influences, stress levels and concerns about appearance are critical determinants of substance use behaviors among teenagers [79]. To overcome obstacles to engaging populations, in substance abuse treatment programs it is essential to have competence and an understanding of how peer pressure, family influences and fears related to losing face contribute to enrollment barriers [79]. Peer relationships, family dynamics and the promotion of life skills have been recognized as elements, in preventing and addressing substance abuse issues [80,81]. Peer education programs have shown success in increasing students understanding, confidence and attitudes towards preventing substance abuse [82].

Healthcare access: Regarding healthcare access it is vital to address disparities in accessing healthcare services, health and addiction services to ensure fair access to healthcare and reduce health inequalities among minority youth. Utilizing approaches in healthcare delivery can significantly enhance health outcomes for diverse populations. Pumariega et al., highlighted the importance of systems of care for children mental health to address healthcare access disparities and improve health outcomes for minority youth [83]. Moreover, minority youth often encounter growing challenges related to health disparities and accessing health services.

Neighborhood and built environment: The quality of the neighborhood environment plays a role in influencing youth drug use behavior, including factors such as safety levels, availability of facilities and exposure to drug related activities. Minority communities frequently encounter obstacles in these aspects underscoring the need, for tailored interventions to enhance these environments. Studies have discovered that how safe people feel in their neighborhoods is linked to physical activity and this connection seems to be stronger, for minority groups compared to white individuals [84]. Moreover, areas with a number of immigrants may have levels of neighborhood quality, which can affect healthy behaviors [85]. Research has shown that neighborhoods designed for walking are connected to levels of activity, better social connections, lower rates of depression and less alcohol misuse [86]. The social environment within a neighborhood, including safety and drug related issues has been connected to substance use among african and americans teenagers living in urban centers [87]. Additionally, interventions focused on improving community cohesion and safety can help reduce behavior problems among kids [88]. It's important to address aspects like safety and access to community resources within neighborhoods to promote health and wellbeing among residents. Encouraging community involvement and making environmental enhancements are steps in building healthier communities and bridging gaps in healthcare access [89]. Understanding how neighborhood conditions impact health and substance use behaviors can guide targeted efforts aimed at creating more supportive environments for young people [90].

Strategic approaches: Educational actions and prevention

Dealing with the gaps, in educating people about opioids calls for strategies that take into account factors like race, diversity, fairness and inclusivity. These approaches should prioritize education as a tool in prevention equipping youth with the knowledge and abilities to make choices regarding substance use.

Tailored learning initiatives: It is imperative to create programs that are culturally aware and tailored to meet the needs of diverse youth populations. Using examples and teaching methods that resonate with groups is essential. Customizing interventions to acknowledge the backgrounds and experiences of minority youths can boost the effectiveness and influence of these programs. Studies have emphasized the significance of offering care to Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) youth to ensure they receive necessary information and support from healthcare services [91]. Furthermore, community based health facilities have been recognized as an access point for youth care for those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds or racial and ethnic minority groups [92].

Community centered approaches: Involving community members, in designing and executing prevention initiatives ensures that programs are meaningful and rooted in the community context. This method also contributes to creating an atmosphere that promotes behaviors and values diversity. Involving the community in activities related to designing, implementing and evaluating services can be beneficial [93]. It is important to engage communities, in shaping prevention programs to ensure they are culturally sensitive and cater to the needs of populations [94]. Community participation in research plays a role in translating knowledge into practical applications necessitating innovative approaches to involve community members in research planning and execution [95]. By incorporating community viewpoints and including community members in decision making processes, prevention programs can better address the needs and obstacles faced by populations [96].

Equity in education: Ensuring opportunities is essential for creating inclusive and effective learning environments. Integrating substance use education into school curricula can play a role in providing information about opioids to all students regardless of their race or economic background [97,98]. Additionally offering health services and social support is essential especially for minority youth who may face stigma or lack access to traditional healthcare services 99,100]. Implementing policies that improve living conditions, in underserved communities can help diminish health disparities and boost wellbeing. Policies need to prioritize reducing the accessibility of opioids boosting opportunities and improving wellbeing with a key emphasis, on fairness and inclusivity [101,102]. Addressing these aspects and promoting equality in education and healthcare can help create a supportive community for everyone [103].

Discussion

The issue of health disparities related to youth opioid use stems from an interplay of factors such as race, diversity, equity and inclusion. These disparities result from obstacles that disproportionately impact marginalized communities highlighting the need for an approach to address them effectively. To tackle these differences effectively it is important to develop a plan that combines education, community engagement and healthcare services that are easily accessible to everyone. It is important to integrate principles of fairness and inclusivity into every aspect of the intervention strategy. This approach should include customizing materials to suit cultures empowering communities to handle health issues efficiently and ensuring that healthcare systems can cater to the diverse needs of various groups without bias.

Conclusion

Furthermore, by understanding and addressing the needs and obstacles faced by demographic groups, in-depth stakeholders can create more successful prevention and intervention plans. These plans, once put into action not only aim to decrease misuse but also aim to cultivate environments that support better health outcomes for all young people. This comprehensive approach is essential for breaking down the systems that perpetuate health inequalities and for paving the way towards a future where health fairness is a reality rather than just an ideal goal.

References

1. Singhal A, et al. Racial-ethnic disparities in opioid prescriptions at emergency department visits for conditions commonly associated with prescription drug abuse. PLoS One. 2016;11:1-14.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Jones C, et al. Prescription opioid misuse and use of alcohol and other substances among high school student’s youth risk behavior survey, United States, 2019. MMWR Suppl. 2020;69:38-46.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Butler A. Social determinants of health and racial/ethnic disparities in type 2 diabetes in youth. Curr Diab Rep. 2017;17:60.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Nalven T, et al. Risk and protective factors for opioid misuse in American Indian adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;206:107736.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Kaur L, et al. The role of family in youth opioid misuse: A literature review. J Fam Jor. 2019;27:429-442.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

6. Romanelli R, et al. Disparities in postoperative opioid prescribing by race and ethnicity: An electronic health records based observational study from Northern California, 2015–2020. Arch Public Health. 2023;81:83.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

7. Engel RE, et al. Patient preference and risk assessment in opioid prescribing disparities. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:2118801.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Hausmann L, et al. Racial disparities in the monitoring of patients on chronic opioid therapy. Pain. 2013;154:46-52.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

9. Pielech M, et al. Comorbid chronic pain and opioid misuse in youth: Knowns, unknowns and implications for behavioral treatment. Am Psychol. 2020;75:811-824.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

10. Wallander J, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in health-related quality of life and health status across pre-, early- and mid-adolescence: A prospective cohort study. Qual Life Res. 2019;28:1761-1771.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

11. Swift S, et al. Racial discrimination in medical care settings and opioid pain reliever misuse in a U.S. cohort: 1992 to 2015. PLoS One. 2019;14:0226490.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

12. Basch C. Healthier students are better learners: A missing link in school reforms to close the achievement gap. J Sch Health. 2011;81:593-598.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

13. Edidin J, et al. The mental and physical health of homeless youth: A literature review. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2011;43:354-375.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

14. Kenny M, et al. The role of perceived barriers and relational support in the educational and vocational lives of urban high school students. J Couns Psychol. 2003;50;142-155.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

15. Toomey R, et al. Gender-nonconforming lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth: School victimization and young adult psychosocial adjustment. Dev Psychol. 2010;46:1580-1589.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

16. Ertl A, et al. Surveillance for violent deaths national violent death reporting system, 32 states, 2016. MMWR Suppl Summ. 2019;68:1-36.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

17. Humbert M, et al. Factors that influence physical activity participation among high and low-ses youth. Qual Health Res. 2006;16:467-483.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

18. Cerda M, et al. Nonmedical prescription opioid use in childhood and early adolescence predicts transitions to heroin use in young adulthood: A national study. J Pediatr. 2015;167:605-612.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

19. Tester J, et al. Making the playfields even: Evaluating the impact of an environmental intervention on park use and physical activity. Prev Med. 2009;48:316-320.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

20. Alegria M, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric mental health. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Ame. 2010;19:759-774.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

21. Fante-Coleman T, et al. Barriers and facilitators to accessing mental healthcare in Canada for black youth: A scoping review. Adolesc Res Rev. 2020;5:115-136.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

22. Alegria M, et al. Role of referrals in mental health service disparities for racial and ethnic minority youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51:703-711.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

23. Panday S, et al. Perceived barriers to accessing Female Community Health Volunteers’ (FCHV) services among ethnic minority women in Nepal: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2019;14:0217070.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

24. Peterson R, et al. The impact of social determinants and air pollution on healthcare disparities in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2023;37:147-152.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

25. Westenberg JN, et al. Treatment approaches and outcome trajectories for youth with high‐risk opioid use: A narrative review. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021;16:207-220.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

26. Liebschutz JM, et al. Improving adherence to long-term opioid therapy guidelines to reduce opioid misuse in primary care. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1265.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

27. Alinsky R, et al. Receipt of addiction treatment after opioid overdose among medicaid-enrolled adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:195183.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

28. Linton SL, et al. people don’t just start shooting heroin on their 18th birthday: A qualitative study of community stakeholder’s perspectives on adolescent opioid use and opportunities for intervention in Baltimore, Maryland. Prev Sci. 2021;22:621-632.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

29. Benjet C, et al. Youth who neither study nor work: Mental health, education and employment. Salud Publica Mex. 2012;54:410-417.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

30. Majee W, et al. Rural voices: A social‐ecological perspective on factors influencing youth substance use in rural South Africa. Health Soc Care Community. 2021;29:1824-1832.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

31. Ali F, et al. Youth substance use service provider’s perspectives on use and service access in ontario: Time to reframe the discourse. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022;17:9.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

32. Eisman A, et al. Trajectories of organized activity participation among urban adolescents: Associations with young adult outcomes. J Community Psychol. 2017;45:513-527.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

33. Frempong G, et al. Access to postsecondary education: Can schools compensate for socioeconomic disadvantage? High Edu. 2011;63:19-32.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

34. Braverman PK, et al. Office-based care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning youth. Pediatrics. 2013;132:198-203.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

35. Russell C, et al. Assessing service and treatment needs and barriers of youth who use illicit and non-medical prescription drugs in northern Ontario, Canada. PLoS One. 2019;14:0225548.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

36. Fagan AA, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and adolescent substance use. J Drug Issues. 2012;43:69-84.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

37. MacDonald K, et al. Pathways to mental health services for young people: A systematic review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018;53:1005-1038.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

38. Garney W, et al. Social-ecological barriers to access to healthcare for adolescents: A scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:4138.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

39. Morris J, et al. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health: The global challenges. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131:540-542.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

40. Brittain AW, et al. Youth-friendly family planning services for young people: A systematic review update. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55:725-735.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

41. Roberts AL, et al. Elevated risk of posttraumatic stress in sexual minority youths: Mediation by childhood abuse and gender nonconformity. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:1587-1593.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

42. Beauchamp MLH, et al. Barriers to access and utilization of healthcare services for minority-language speakers with neurodevelopmental disorders: A scoping review. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:915999.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

43. McDanal R, et al. Associations of LGBTQ+ identities with acceptability and efficacy of online single-session youth mental health interventions. Behav Ther. 2021;53:376-391.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

44. Golzari M, et al. Healthcare utilization and barriers for youth post-detention. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2013;25:65-67.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

45. Saloner B, et al. Blacks and hispanics are less likely than whites to complete addiction treatment, largely due to socioeconomic factors. Health Aff. 2013;32:135-145.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

46. Natali I, et al. Prescription opioids and economic hardship in france. Eur J Health Econ. 2023;24:1473-1504.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

47. Teplin LA, et al. Major mental disorders, substance use disorders, comorbidity and HIV-AIDS risk behaviors in juvenile detainees. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56:823-828.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

48. Bryson EO, et al. Addiction and substance abuse in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:905-917.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

49. Mazer‐Amirshahi M, et al. Rising opioid prescribing in adult U.S. emergency department visits: 2001–2010. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21:236-243.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

50. Joynt M, et al. The impact of neighborhood socioeconomic status and race on the prescribing of opioids in emergency departments throughout the United States. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:1604-1610.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

51. Gamm L. Mental health and substance abuse services among rural minorities. J Rural Health. 2004;20:206-209.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

52. Kershaw KN, et al. Metropolitan-level racial residential segregation and black-white disparities in hypertension. A J Epidemiol. 2011;174:537-545.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

53. Anangwe KA, et al. Did macro structural effects of the great recession impact substance abuse outpatient treatment completion rates for minorities? Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Research in Social Sciences. 2019.

    [Google Scholar]

54. Godette DC, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in patterns and determinants of criminal justice involvement among youth in substance abuse treatment programs. J Correct Health Care. 2011;17:294-308.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

55. Schulz AJ, et al. Social and physical environments and disparities in risk for cardiovascular disease: The healthy environments partnership conceptual model. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:1817-1825

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

56. Guerrero EG, et al. Racial/ethnic minority and low-income hotspots and their geographic proximity to integrated care providers. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2013;8:34.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

57. Foster JE, et al. A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica. 1984;52:761.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

58. Clary C, et al. Spatial access to substance abuse treatment for low-income and minority households. Proceedings of the Third ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on the Use of GIS in Public Health. 2014;45-56.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

59. Stephens-Hernandez AB, et al. Drama-based education to motivate participation in substance abuse prevention. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2007;2:11.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

60. Nguyen AP, et al. Association of opioids prescribed to family members with opioid overdose among adolescents and young adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:201018.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

61. Alinsky R, et al. Receipt of addiction treatment after opioid overdose among medicaid-enrolled adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:195183.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

62. Han YR. The moderating effect of cultural competence educational needs on the relationship between transcultural self-efficacy and cultural competence in Korean public health nurses. BMC Nur. 2023;22:103.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

63. Patel I, et al. Cultural competency education in pharmacy curricula-need and implementation. Indian J Pharm Pract. 2020;13:97-112.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

64. Grove DH et al. Cultural competence: Where are we as athletic training educators? Athle Training Edu J. 2020;15:49-54.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

65. Hadland SE, et al. Opioid use disorder and overdose among youth following an initial opioid prescription. Addiction. 2021;116:2790-2800.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

66. Hawke LD, et al. Addressing Canada's opioid crisis: A qualitative study of the perspectives of youth receiving substance use services. Canad J Addiction. 2022;13:39-47.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

67. Abraham O, et al. Developing a theory-driven serious game to promote prescription opioid safety among adolescents: Mixed methods study. JMIR Serious Games. 2020;8:18207.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

68. Micieli JA, et al. Understanding the service needs of youth with opioid use: A descriptive study of demographics and co-occurring substance use and mental health concerns. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022;132:108592.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

69. Nairn SA, et al. Lessons learned from “a day for youth voices on the opioid overdose crisis” and future directions for research on the youth polysubstance use emergency in Canada. Canad J Addiction. 2022;13:8-17.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

70. Nairn SA, et al. Characterizing the landscape of service provider needs and gaps in services during the Canadian youth polysubstance use health crisis. Canad J Addiction. 2022;13:29-38.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

71. Nairn SA, et al. An exploration of youth, family and provider-identified solutions to the Canadian youth opioid health threat. Canad J Addiction. 2022;13:4-7.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

72. Allen JP, et al. Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: Susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability and depression. Dev Psychopatholo. 2006;18:155-175.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

73. Valente TW, et al. Peer acceleration: Effects of a social network tailored substance abuse prevention program among high‐risk adolescents. Addiction. 2007;102:1804-1815.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

74. Alhyas L, et al. Adolescents’ perception of substance use and factors influencing its use: A qualitative study in Abu Dhabi. JRSM Open. 2015;6:205427041456716.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

75. Bassiony MM, et al. Substance use disorders in Saudi Arabia: Review article. J Subst Use. 2013;18:450-466.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

76. Zakaria E, et al. Sustaining the low income family participation in drug prevention based program: The promising factors. Int J Acad Re Busin Socl Scie. 2021;11.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

77. Namada JM, et al. Drug and substance abuse among university students. 2021.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

78. Heydarabadi AB, et al. Prevalence of substance abuse among dormitory students of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Int J High Risk Behav Addictio. 2015;4:22350.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

79. Nath A, et al. Substance abuse amongst adolescents: An issue of public health significance. Cureus. 2022;14:31193.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

80. Yoon D, et al. Child maltreatment types and adolescent substance use: The role of deviant peer affiliation. Child Fam Soc Work. 2019;25:355-363.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

81. Buhler A, et al. The role of life skills promotion in substance abuse prevention: A mediation analysis. Health Educ Res. 2007;23:621-632.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

82. Betese K. Psychoactive substance abuse among secondary school students in Tanzania: Exploring perception and understanding of its impact on academic achievement. Asian J Ed Soc Stud. 2022;1-14.

    [Google Scholar]

83. Pumariega AJ, et al. Culturally competent systems of care for children’s mental health: Advances and challenges. Community Ment Health J. 2005;41:539-555.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

84. Williams DR, et al. Social sources of racial disparities in health. Health Aff. 2005;24:325-334.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

85. Osypuk TL, et al. Are immigrant enclaves healthy places to live? The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. So Sci Med. 2009;69:110-120.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

86. Renalds A, et al. A systematic review of built environment and health. Fam Amp Community Health. 2010;33:68-78.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

87. Lambert SF, et al. The relationship between perceptions of neighborhood characteristics and substance use among urban African American adolescents. Am J Community Psychol. 2004;34:205-218.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

88. Kim Y, et al. Is neighborhood poverty harmful to every child? Neighborhood poverty, family poverty and behavioral problems among young children. J Community Psychol. 2018;47:594-610.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

89. Kaiser ML, et al. Individual and community engagement in response to environmental challenges experienced in four low-income urban neighborhoods. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1831.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

90. Dahal S, et al. Association between neighborhood conditions and mental disorders among children in us: Evidence from the national survey of children’s health 2011/12. Psychiatry J. 2018;2018:1-9.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

91. Laiti M, et al. Encountering sexual and gender minority youth in healthcare: An integrative review. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019;20:30.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

92. Reisner SL, et al. Mental health of transgender youth in care at an adolescent urban community health center: A matched retrospective cohort study. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56:274-279.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

93. Carter MW, et al. Community engagement in family planning in the U.S. Am J Pre Med. 2015;49:116-123.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

94. Rohit A, et al. The adaptation of a youth diabetes prevention program for aboriginal children in central Australia: Community perspectives. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:9173.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

95. Alvarado J, et al. Community scientist program provides bi-directional communication and co-learning between researchers and community members. Journal of Clin Transl Sci. 2023;8:81.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

96. Battaglia TA, et al. Connecting community to research: A training program to increase community engagement in research. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13:209-217.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

97. Fang W, et al. The development of substance-abuse curricular content by five North Carolina schools. Acad Med. 1998;73:1039-1043.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

98. Callahan RM, et al. Equitable access for secondary English learner students. Edu Adm Q. 2016;52:463-496.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

99. Bangkara BA, et al. Managing higher education in pandemic era in the challenge of education quality and equity. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan. 2022;7:120-138.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

100. Kalir J. Equity-oriented design in open education. The Inter J Info Lear Tech. 2018;35:357-367.

     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

101. Burroughs N. Rawls, republicanism and the adequacy-equity debate. Theo Res Edu. 2015;14:226-240.

     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

102. Lowell VL, et al. Multigenerational classrooms in higher education: Equity and learning with technology. The Inter J Info Lear Tech. 2019;36:78-93.

     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

103. Hemmer L. Teachers’ enactment of equity in alternative schools: A critical discourse analysis. J Cont Issues Edu. 2012;6:4-22.

     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]