e-ISSN:2320-1215 p-ISSN: 2322-0112
Bing Gao,2, Ran Xia1, Qing-Ling Li1, Zhu Wang2, Heng-Wang2, Yue-Cheng1, Qiang-Ma1, Zhuo-Cao Qi3, Wei Wang1, Yong-Lei Zeng4, Jing Wang1,2*
1 Department of Chinese Medicine, Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
2 Department of Acupuncture and Massage, Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
3 Department of Basic Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
4 Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
Received: 30-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. JPPS-24-146895; Editor assigned: 02-Sep-2024, PreQC No. JPPS-24-146895 (PQ); Reviewed: 16-Sep-2024, QC No. JPPS-24-146895; Revised: 23-Sep-2024, Manuscript No. JPPS-24-146895 (R); Published: 30-Sep-2024, DOI: 10.4172/2320-1215.13.3.004
Citation: Gao B, et al. Moxibustion as an Adjuvant Therapy for Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. RRJ Pharm Pharm Sci. 2024;13:004
Copyright: © 2024 Gao B, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews in Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Background: Moxibustion as an adjuvant therapy shows clinical efficacy in the treatment of Heart Failure (HF). However, there has been a lack of overall evaluation of the efficacy of moxibustion.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxibustion combined with conventional drug therapy and the quality of evidence regarding its use for preventing ventricular remodeling, improving cardiac function and improving the prognosis of patients with HF.
Method: Search the keywords moxibustion therapy and HF from 7 databases. EndNote X8 software was used for literature management. RevMan 5.4.1 software was used to summarize data and Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the quality of research.
Results: A total of 910 patients were included from 11 studies. Meta-analysis showed that compared with the control groups, patients treated with moxibustion had significantly improved 6-min walk experiment (6-MWD) scores (Mean Difference (MD)=57.39, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (39.49 to 75.30), p<0.01) and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) scores (MD =4.93, 95% CI (3.12 to 6.74) for patients with HF, p<0.01), according to GRADE, those using LVEF, Lee's HF score and Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) were “moderate quality” and others were “low quality” or “very low quality”.
Conclusion: Studies suggest that moxibustion is a safe adjuvant treatment that can improve the cardiac function and prognosis of patients with HF. However, owing to the small sample sizes used in previous studies and the low quality of evidence, these results need to be further verified.
Moxibustion; Heart failure; Meta-analysis; GRADE
Heart Failure (HF) is the final stage of cardiovascular disease. Its characteristic symptoms include dyspnea, ankle swelling and fatigue [1]. A recent epidemiological studies in China show that the prevalence of HF in adults is 0.90%, the incidence rate of HF increases with age [2]. At present, diuretics, β-receptor antagonists, anticoagulants and other drugs are used in the clinical treatment of HF [3]. Despite recent progress in treatment, the morbidity, mortality and economic burden among HF patients remain high [4]. About 50% of heart failure patients die within 5 years after diagnosis and about 20% die within 1 year after diagnosis and the survival rate of heart failure patients is low [5]. Therefore, adjuvant therapies with outstanding curative effects, such as moxibustion, have attracted research attention. Moxibustion therapy has the properties of warming the body and eliminating cold when used as a burning herbal preparation containing mugwort (Artemisia). Accumulating evidence suggests that moxibustion has a positive regulatory effect on HF. Jin et al., selected RN17, BL15, BL13 and BL17 to treat HF by moxibustion [6]. Similarly, Ji et al., demonstrated that moxibustion can reduce serum High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) and N-Terminal Precursor Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in patients with Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) and improve the clinical symptoms and cardiac function [7]. The research of our research group also confirmed that moxibustion has a benign regulatory effect on heart and neuroendocrine function of CHF rats [8-10]. However, more evidence is needed to elucidate how moxibustion can improves the symptoms of patients with HF by regulating the neuroendocrine system [11]. Previous studies have shown that acupuncture, as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of HF, is a promising intervention. Nonetheless, the mechanisms of action of acupuncture and moxibustion are not wholly consistent [12]. Acupuncture is a hot spot in research; consequently, the effects of moxibustion may have been missed in previous studies. Furthermore, there has been no systematic appraisal of risk of bias or evidence quality in previous studies; this will be necessary to draw confident conclusions. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of moxibustion in the adjuvant treatment of heart failure to evaluate its efficacy and safety and the quality of evidence regarding its role in preventing ventricular remodeling and improving clinical symptoms in HF patients.
The present meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [13]. The protocol for this meta-analysis is available in PROSPERO (no. CRD42021292818).
Literature search
Search strategies: Seven Chinese and English databases were independently searched by two researchers (Yue-Cheng and Heng-Wang), comprising PubMed/MEDLINE (PubMed.gov), the Cochrane Library (cochranelibrary.com), EMBASE (embase.com), Web of Science (videos.webofsciencegroup.com), Wanfang data (wanfangdata.com), China national Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI.net) and Chongqing VIP (cqvip.com). The databases were searched within a time range from the earliest index to October 03rd, 2021.
Inclusion criteria: This study followed the Pressured-Controlled Intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion (PICSO) principle to establish the following inclusion criteria based on factors including participants, interventions, comparisons, results and research design. (1) Patients with a diagnosis of HF, either CHF or acute HF, were eligible. There were no restrictions on gender, race, ejection fraction, systolic/diastolic HF; (2) Studies need to include a control group treated with conventional therapy. The treatment group included moxibustion intervention measures; (3) In addition, the intervention type was moxibustion plus conventional drug therapy vs. conventional drug therapy. All patients who used Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) were included in the treatment group and patients who only used conventional medicine were included in the control group; (4) The main outcome measures were cardiac function and curative effect, including the 6-Min Walk Test (6-MWT), Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and NT-proBNP. Secondary outcome measures included Lee's HF Score (Leehfs), BNP and adverse events and (5) The studies included were RCTs (blinded or non-blinded or placebo).
Exclusion criteria: (1) Studies involving HF caused by pregnancy, chemotherapy, congenital disabilities, or surgery were excluded; (2) Studies of TCM treatment methods other than moxibustion were excluded, as were studies with; (3) Incorrect, incomplete, or unavailable outcome data.
Study selection and data extraction: The research used Endnote X8 to manage all the retrieved literature. First, a preliminary screening was performed, in which we removed duplicate studies and each title and abstract was checked for relevance; studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. If the title or abstract was confusing, we reviewed the whole article in the secondary screening. If necessary, we contacted the person who performed the trial for more precise information. Two independent researchers (Yue-Cheng and Heng-Wang) recorded details of the articles to be included in the study in a predefined excel format, including author, year, country, sample size, disease, moxibustion method, intervention measures, frequency, duration, outcome indicators (i.e., 6-MWT, LVEF, NT-proBNP, Leehfs, BNP) and adverse events. In case of disagreement, it will be resolved independently by the third researcher (Zhu Wang).
Assessment of risk of bias: Researchers (Yue-Cheng and Heng-Wang) used Cochrane manual 5.1.0 to assess the quality of the included literature [14]. The RCT literature quality evaluation (risk bias assessment tool) included by Cochrane is as follows: (1) Random sequence generation; (2) Allocation concealment; (3) Blinding of participants and personnel; (4) Blinding of outcome assessment; (5) Incomplete outcome data; (6) Selective reporting and (7) Other biases. Considering the characteristics of moxibustion therapy, other biases include the details of moxibustion (such as the quality specification of moxa velvet, the thickness of moxa sticks and the distance between the ignition point and the skin). The risk of bias includes three options: High risk, low risk or unclear risk.
GRADE: We used the GRADE evidence quality grading and recommendation strength system to evaluate the quality of the main results [15]. According to the GRADE approach, the quality of the evidence group is divided into four categories: High, medium, low and very low. The GRADE approach includes 5 reasons that may reduce the quality of evidence and 3 possible reasons for improving the quality. The quality of evidence and the intensity of recommendation are clearly defined. It is one of the most authoritative scoring methods currently formulated by a widely representative group of international guidelines [16,17].
Statistical analysis: The study used Revman 5.4.1 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) to analyze the included literature. The inverse-variance method in RevMan was adopted. Dichotomous data were computed using the Mantel–Haenszel (MH) statistical method, Fixed Effect (FE) analysis model, Random
Effect (RE) analysis model, Odds Ratio (OR) effect measure and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Continuity variables were expressed as Mean Difference (MD) (95% CI) and different outcome scales were combined using Standardized Mean Deviation (SMD), selecting the inverse variance statistical method, FE analysis model, RE analysis model and MD effect measure to process the data. The included studies quantitatively judged the size of heterogeneity through I2. If there is no statistical heterogeneity among the research results, FE analysis model is used for meta-analysis; If there is statistical heterogeneity among the research results, the source of heterogeneity will be further analyzed. After excluding the influence of obvious clinical heterogeneity, the RE analysis model will be used for meta-analysis. We performed a sensitivity analysis by removing single or multiple studies to determine the sources of heterogeneity and consistency. If an investigation was deleted from one or more studies and the heterogeneity was significantly reduced as a result, this study was considered to be the primary source of heterogeneity and further read and evaluated.
Literature search and study selection
Using the search strategy described in section 2.1.1, a total of 566 literatures were retrieved. First, 239 duplicates were excluded and then a further 295 papers were removed (including 37 reviews, 43 animal studies and 215 irrelevant articles). Among the remaining 32 clinical papers on moxibustion in the treatment of HF, there were two case reports, 16 articles with no target indicators, one trial scheme, three studies involving combined therapy and one duplicate article. Finally, this systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed 11 RCT articles on moxibustion in the treatment of HF (Figure 1).
Characteristics of the included studies
Eleven RCTs met the inclusion criteria: All studies were conducted in China [18-20]. Nine studies focused on CHF and two studies considered acute HF or CHF [20-26]. A total of 920 patients were included in 11 studies and patients recruited in a single study ranged from 60 to 108; 460 patients in the treatment groups received moxibustion treatment, compared with the control groups receiving general treatment [26-28]. These studies were published online in Chinese or English from 2015 to 2021. The degree of HF was assessed by the cardiac function evaluation scheme of the New York Heart Association (NYHA). Only one trial included patients with grade IV HF and other trials recruited patients with grade II-III HF. Most subjects had a disease course of more than 3 years and two studies did not explain the subject’s disease course [19,25]. The included study showed that the treatment was indirect moxibustion. Four studies used Gewu moxibustion (in which the burning end of a moxa stick is separated by Chinese herbal medicine), six studies used moxa sticks, of which one used Leihuo moxibustion (with moxa sticks containing other traditional Chinese medicines) [24]. In addition, one study used a moxibustion instrument for treatment. Moxibustion tools were used in seven studies [18-22,25-27]. The research method was to add moxibustion to routine drug treatment and compare the curative effects of the two groups. All interventions lasted for 5 min-60 min. Treatment time ranged from 1 week to 12 weeks. Three physiological indexes (6-MWT, LVEF and NT-proBNP) were the main outcomes. Furthermore, five studies reported Leehfs and three studies reported BNP [18,23,27]. These measurements are used as secondary results in the study of heart function. Three studies reported adverse reactions; in two of these, the patient had a small blister [18,19,26]. The characteristics of the 11 studies are shown in Table 1.
Author | Sample size (T/C) | Disease | Moxa method | Intervention | Frequency | Outcome | Adverse event | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment group | Control group | |||||||
Zeng et al. [18] | 46/46 | CHF/AHF | Moxa box | Moxa (RN4, RN6, RN9, RN8, RN12) plus med | med | 7d, 1/d | BNP, Lee HFS | None |
Dong et al. [19] | 32/32 | CHF/AHF | Moxa tube | Moxa (BL15, BL13, BL20, BL23, RN4) plus med | med | 7d, 1/d | NT-probnp, Lee HFS | Blister (T:1) |
Wang et al. [20] | 45/45 | CHF | Moxa box plus aconite cake | Moxa (RN4, RN6, ST36, PC6) plus med | med | 22d, 1/d | LEVF, NT-probnp | NR |
Lin et al. [21] | 31/31 | CHF | Moxa box | Moxa (BL15, RN17) plus med | med | 4w, 1/2d | NT-probnp | NR |
Gao et al. [22] | 61/61 | CHF | Moxa plus CHM cake | Moxa (BL44, DU11) plus med | med | 12w, 1/d | 6-MWT, LEVF, NT-probnp, Lee HFS LVEDd | NR |
Xia et al. [23] | 40/40 | CHF | Long snake Moxa | Moxa (DuMai from GV14 to GV2) plus med | med | 12w, 1/w | 6-MWT, LEVF, BNP, LVEDd | NR |
Li et al. [24] | 46/46 | CHF | Leihuo moxa stick plus Moxa box | Moxa (LI1, SP1, DU9, DU10, DU11, DU4) plus med | med | 6w, 1/d | 6-MWT, LEVF, NT-probnp, LeeHFS, LVEDd | NR |
Zhang et al. [25] | 30/30 | CHF | Moxa box | Moxa (RN12, RN8, RN4, ST36, ST40) plus med | med | 10d, 1/d | 6-MWT, LEVF | NR |
Chen et al. [26] | 30/30 | CHF | Moxa apparatus | Moxa (BL15, BL13, BL14, PC4, PC6) plus med | med | 3w, 5/w | 6-MWT, LEVF, NT-probnp, LVEDd | Blister (T:1) |
Deng et al. [27] | 40/40 | CHF | Moxa | Moxa (BL15, DU9, RN17) plus med | med | 8w, 1/d | 6-MWT, LEVF, BNP, LVEDd | NR |
Liu et al. [28] | 54/54 | CHF | Moxa plus CHM cake | Moxa (BL44, DU11) plus med | med | 12w, 1/d | 6-MWT, LEVF, NT-probnp, LeeHFS, LVEDd | NR |
Note: CHF: Chronic Heart Failure; AHF: Acute Heart Failure; Moxa: Moxibustion; CHM: Chinese Herbal Medicine; med: Medicine; 3 moxa ‘snakes’: Moxibustion Takes Three Times; Lee HFS: Lee Heart Failure Score; T: Treatment Group; C: Control Group; NR: No Reporting.
Table 1. Characteristics of the included literature.
Assessment of risk of bias
Eight studies reported and used a random number table [18,19,27,28]. In one study, a computer was used to randomly generate numbers; therefore, this study was evaluated as low risk in terms of bias [21]. Two studies mentioned randomization but did not specify the method of randomization, these studies belong to the risk of unclear bias [20,26]. One study assigned patients to the study group by using a sealed opaque envelope; this was rated as low risk [21]. Two studies where patients were assigned according to their order of admission were ranked as high risk [20,26]. Eight of the studies did not explain how allocation was concealed. So the risk of bias in these studies was unclear [22-25]. Owing to the characteristics of moxibustion therapy, none of the studies used blinding. Most trials did not report the use of blinded outcome assessments and were therefore judged to have an unclear risk of bias. However, one study emphasized that researchers were prohibited from influencing patients to ensure the objectivity of the results; this study was therefore judged to have a low risk of bias [21]. Six studies had a low risk of bias for incomplete outcome data, the drop-out rate of participants was slightly less than 10%. Other studies did not clearly describe the drop-out of patients, so the risk was assessed as unclear [18-21,23,26]. Finally, regarding selective criteria; there may also have been other biases as shown in Figure 2.
Outcomes
6-MWT score: Seven studies (n=612) examined the effects of moxibustion on scores on the 6-MWT [22-28]. There was pronounced heterogeneity between the trials (MD=57.39, 95% CI (39.49 to 75.30), p<0.01, I2=79%, Figure 3); hence, an Reverse Emitter (RE) model was used for statistical analysis. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the stability of the results. When we only observe the study of the combination of moxibustion and Chinese herbal medicine (as in Gewu moxibustion and LeiHuo moxibustion), results did not change (p<0.01) but heterogeneity decreased (I2=0%, Table 2), suggesting that the results were relatively stable. Therefore, the results show that addition of moxibustion to conventional treatment could improve 6-MWT scores.
Outcome | Studies | Heterogeneity test | Effect model | Meta-analysis results | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p-value | I2 value | MD (95% CI) | p-value | |||
6-WMT | 3 [22,24,28] | 0.91 | 0% | Random | 84.77 (68.45, 101.08) | <0.00001 |
LVEF | 5 [20,22-24,28] | 0.16 | 40% | Random | 6.25 (4.68, 7.82) | <0.00001 |
NT-proBNP | 3 [19,20,26] | 0.99 | 0% | Random | -95.98 (-143.83, -48.13) | <0.0001 |
LeehfS | 2 [18,19] | 0.22 | 32% | Random | -0.62 (-1.52, 0.27) | 0.17 |
BNP | 2 [18,27] | 0.94 | 0% | Random | -293.29 (-397.41, -189.17) | <0.00001 |
Note: CI: Confidence Interval; 6-WMT: 6-Minute Walk Experiment; LEVF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction; NT-proBNP: N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide; Leehfs: Lee Heart Failure Score; BNP: Brain Natriuretic Peptide.
Table 2. Sensitivity analysis of various indicators.
LVEF score: Eight RCTs enrolled 702 patients and observed the Ventricular Ejection Function of patients with HF based on LVEF indicators. As apparent heterogeneity existed among studies (MD=4.93, 95% CI (3.12 to 6.74), p<0.01, I2=68%, Figure 4), an RE model was used [20,22-28]. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that when we analyzed Gewu moxibustion, LeiHuo moxibustion and long snake moxibustion, the results did not change (p<0.01) but the heterogeneity was reduced (I2=40%, Table 2). The remaining heterogeneity may have been caused by the mode of intervention.
NT-proBNP score: Six RCT studies used NT-proBNP to detect therapeutic effects in HF patients (The data of Lin et al., are expressed in interval form and could not be merged with other studies. The author of this study did not respond to my email inquiry. Finally, this meta-analysis was included in six studies) [19-20,21,24,26,28]. We used an RE model because of the obvious heterogeneity (MD=-490.65, 95% CI (-760.16 to -221.13), p<0.01, I²=95%, Figure 5). Sensitivity analysis showed that when we analyze all studies that received less than 30 treatments, the results changed little (p<0.01) and the heterogeneity was reduced (I2=0%, Table 2), suggesting that the results were relatively stable.
Leehfs: Five RCT studies included 478 patients and used Leehfs to study the prognosis of patients with HF [18,19,22,24,28]. These pooled studies were analyzed by RE models because of the marked heterogeneity (MD=-490.65, 95% CI (-760.16 to -221.13), p<0.01, I2=95%, Figure 6). Moxibustion treatment was significantly correlated with Leehfs; however, the results were reversed after the sensitivity analysis (p=0.17, I2=32%, Table 2), indicating that this finding was unreliable.
BNP score: Three RCTs (n=252) used BNP to assess the prognosis of patients with HF [18,23,27]. Meta-analysis showed that moxibustion combined with routine treatment alone. There was significant heterogeneity in the included studies (p<0.01, I2=84%, Figure 7); therefore, an RE model was applied. In this sensitivity analysis, when study of Xia et al. was excluded, the heterogeneity among studies was significantly reduced (I2=0%, p=0.94, Table 2) [23]. Meta-analysis results using a fixed effect model also showed that moxibustion combined with standard treatment improved BNP compared with standard treatment alone (p<0.01).
Adverse events: Two studies reported adverse reactions; other studies did not find any adverse reactions [19,26]. Overall, all reported adverse reactions were mild. One case of adverse response (small skin blisters caused by the heat of moxibustion) was reported in the treatment group of each of the two studies [19,26]. Owing to the characteristics of moxibustion treatment, it can easily generate blisters due to heat irritating the skin.
Sensitivity analysis: By eliminating individual studies one by one for sensitivity analysis, the results show that the direction of meta-analysis results has changed and only the results of LVEF score are consistent, indicating that the stability of the results is poor. Table 2 describes the results of sensitivity analysis of various indicators in detail. See 3.4.1.-3.4.5. for the analysis of indicators.
GRADE assessment: According to the GRADE principles, we evaluated the quality of the evidence provided based on 6-WMT, NT-proBNP, LVEF, Leehfs and BNP. Table 3 shows the GRADE method's evaluation of the quality of each index included in the literature. Studies using 6-WMT were classified as “low quality” those using LVEF, Leehfs and BNP were categorized as “moderate quality” and those using NT-proBNP were classified as “very low quality.”
Outcome | Certainty assessment | Number of patients | Effect absolute (95% CI) | Certainty | Importance | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of studies | Study design | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other considerations | Treatment group | Control group | Relative (95% CI) | ||||
6-MWD | 7 [22-28] | Randomized trial | Serious | Seriousa | Not serious | Not serious | None | 306 | 306 | - | MD 57.39 higher (39.49 higher to 75.3 higher) | ⨁⨁◯◯ C (Low) | Important |
LVEF | 8 [20,22-28] | Randomized trial | Not serious | Seriousb | Not serious | Not serious | None | 351 | 351 | - | MD 4.93 higher (3.12 higher to 6.74 higher) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ B (Mode rate) | Critical |
NT-pro BNP | 6 [19,20,21,24,26,28] | Randomized trial | Not serious | Seriousc | Very serious | Not serious | None | 273 | 273 | - | MD 490.65 lower (760.16 lower to 221.13 lower) | ⨁◯◯◯ D (Very Low) | Critical |
LeehfS | 5 [18,19,22,24,28] | Randomized trial | Not serious | Seriousd | Not serious | Not serious | None | 239 | 239 | - | MD 1.66 lower (2.39 lower to 0.92 lower) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ B (Mode rate) | Important |
BNP | 3 [18,23,27] | Randomized trial | Not serious | Seriousf | Not serious | Not serious | None | 126 | 126 | - | MD 107.70 lower (120.71 lower to 94.69 lower) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ B (Mode rate) | Critical |
Note: CI: Confidence Interval; MD: Mean Difference; a: I2=79%; b: I2=68%; c: I2=95%; d: I2 =78%; e: I2=84%; 6-WMT: 6-Minute Walk Experiment; LEVF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction; NT-proBNP: N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide; Leehfs: Lee Heart Failure Score; BNP: Brain Natriuretic Peptide; GRADE: Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
Table 3. GRADE evaluation of evidence quality.
This systematic review is the first to investigate the potential relationships between moxibustion prescription parameters (moxibustion equipment, moxibustion materials, frequency and duration) in TCM therapy and clinical efficacy in HF patients. Previous reviews combined moxibustion prescriptions but did not examine each parameter separately [29]. In particular, the relationships of moxibustion materials and/or duration with clinical efficacy and changes in prognosis following TCM treatment had not been previously investigated.
Moxibustion is an effective method for prevention and treatment of HF and is a commonly used adjuvant therapy in clinical practice. Moxibustion has functions such as warming meridians, dispersing cold and promoting blood circulation and qi circulation. Previous studies have demonstrated the therapeutic role of moxibustion using volatile oil of wormwood leaves (which includes platyclone, eucalyptus oil essence, β-caryophyllene and 39 other compounds) and infrared resonance radiation of acupoints under pathological conditions [30,31]. In addition, this treatment has the potential to improve cardiac function and regulate neuroendocrine reactions [32]. Clinical research has suggested that TCM therapy (e.g. moxibustion) can effectively alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life of patients with CHF [33].
Although previous systematic evaluations and meta-analyses indicate that acupuncture and moxibustion are inseparable, they both act on acupoints and meridians. However, the primary mode of action of moxibustion involves a photo thermal effect, whereas acupuncture involves mechanical stimulation. In addition, acupuncture is mainly used to dispel the causes of disease, so it is mostly used in excess heat syndrome, whereas moxibustion is mainly used to nourish the body and is mostly used in deficiency cold syndrome. Because the theory of TCM believes that the disease nature of HF is mainly deficiency cold, moxibustion is more suitable for the treatment of HF than acupuncture.
None of the 11 studies included were placebo-controlled. In fact, in China, the birthplace of acupuncture and moxibustion, clinical trials rarely include sham acupuncture groups. Thousands of years of clinical experience and curative effects have proved the effectiveness of acupuncture and moxibustion. Moreover, traditional Chinese medicine includes both physiological and psychological interventions.
Regulating the mind is an essential purpose of acupuncture and moxibustion treatment. The so-called placebo effect is closely related to psychological suggestion. Through our meta-analysis, we found that the material, treatment time, and times of wormwood leaves may affect the curative effect of moxibustion. Through further research, we found that in most cases, the materials of moxibustion included wormwood leaves and/or other Chinese herbal medicines such as aconite and ginger. The average retention time of moxibustion is about 25 min (excluding long snake moxibustion). Most studies were conducted over 3 to 12 weeks, three to seven times a week.
This meta-analysis showed that compared with conventional therapy, moxibustion therapy could significantly improve the 6-MWD and LVEF scores of patients with HF and reduce their NT-proBNP scores. In addition, the evidence was assessed as medium and low quality, respectively. 6-MWT can be used for efficacy detection, cardiac function evaluation and prognostic evaluation in cardiovascular diseases [34,35]. Studies of patients with CHF have shown that a 6-MWT walking distance of less than 300 m is associated with a 1-year mortality as high as 50%. In patients with a walking distance greater than 450 m, mortality is significantly reduced [36]. In the current study, we found that moxibustion could improve the 6-MWT scores of patients. Sensitivity analysis showed that when similar moxibustion materials were used, the statistical heterogeneity disappeared, indicating that the use of different moxibustion materials may affect the heterogeneity. Finally, the included literature was of low quality. More reliable evidence is needed to demonstrate that moxibustion improves cardiac function in patients with HF.
Cardiac ultrasound has a vital role in hemorheology and examination of cardiac structural changes in patients with HF. LVEF is an important index that is used to judge cardiac ejection function [37]. According to this meta-analysis, moxibustion could improve LVEF scores. Sensitivity analysis showed that the use of different materials of moxibustion may have led to high heterogeneity. The occurrence and development of HF are closely related to changes in various humoral factors. In particular, NT-proBNP has high specificity and sensitivity for the detection of ventricular function [38]. As well as indicating early changes in ventricular function, it can reflect the severity of CHF and is a significant predictor of cardiac system death and events. According to this meta-analysis, moxibustion could reduce NT-proBNP scores. Sensitivity analysis showed that differences in the number of moxibustion treatments may have been the reason for the heterogeneity among studies. In addition, two studies were of medium quality and thus represent important references for evaluating the efficacy of moxibustion.
Leehfs is a scoring system that was formulated by Lee et al., in 1982, based on clinical manifestations and changes in patient X-rays. It has been widely recognized as a relatively objective standard that can be used to evaluate the curative effects of HF treatments. Leehfs can comprehensively reflect the therapeutic effect of moxibustion on HF [39]. During the onset of HF, the rise of ventricular wall pressure and ventricular endocrine BNP leads to increased BNP levels in the blood. Some studies have shown that detection of BNP is helpful for early diagnosis of CHF [40]. These two indexes demonstrate the superiority of moxibustion combined with conventional treatment.
The advantages of this review include the following. (1) Acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine decoction, heaven moxibustion and other therapies with essentially different effects from moxibustion were excluded, to ensure the consistency of the therapies received by patients with HF; (2) The moxibustion materials, treatment frequency and the duration of each individual treatment of moxibustion were analyzed in two indexes demonstrate the superiority of moxibustion combined with conventional treatment..
This paper provides some insight for future research. First, moxibustion materials, single treatment time and total treatment times have different effects on the improvement in cardiac function. Their relevance can be further clarified later. Second, previous studies have lacked long-term follow-up, so it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of moxibustion therapy further to determine whether it can reduce the hospitalization rate and mortality. Third, to further determine the optimal frequency and amount of moxibustion for the treatment of HF and promote this therapy, a strict, standardized and high-quality RCT design is required to provide high-quality evidence.
This meta-analysis shows that moxibustion can improve cardiac function and clinical symptoms in patients with heart failure. As the quality of the literature included in this meta-analysis was moderate, low, or very low, more high-quality research is needed to provide high-quality evidence in further support of the efficacy of moxibustion. Owing to a lack of follow-up, it is uncertain whether moxibustion can prolong the survival time of patients with HF. There is the low or very low certainty of evidence that the use of moxibustion combined with conventional drug is associated the short-term improvement of cardiac function and clinical symptoms compared to conventional drug therapy alone in patients with HF. In short, we look forward to the implementation of multi center large-scale research to provide more high-quality evidence for moxibustion as an adjuvant therapy for HF in the future.
This study also had some limitations. (1) Owing to the differences in moxibustion implementation methods, moxibustion materials, treatment frequency and treatment time, some heterogeneity of results was evident; (2) There were some differences between acute HF and CHF; (3) Most studies did not specifically describe the process of randomization, allocation concealment and blinding, resulting in low overall quality and high risk of bias and (4) Most studies did not describe their ethical review status and there is the possibility that experimental ethics were violated.
The present review was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81574084); Key Research and Development Plan Project of Anhui Province, China (No. 202004j0702045); and Open Fund Project of the Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Xin'an Medicine (2020xayx07); 2021 natural science research project of colleges and universities in Anhui Province, China (kj2021a0570).
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Bing Gao: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and Editing, Visualization. Ran Xia: Formal analysis. Qingling Li: Investigation. Zhu Wang: Methodology. Heng Wang: Methodology. Yue Cheng: Writing-Review and Editing. Qiang Ma: Validation. Zhuocao Qi: Writing-Review and Editing. Wei Wang: Methodology, Data curation. Yonglei Zeng: Writing-Review and Editing. Jing Wang: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing-Review and Editing.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. No author is a member of the editorial board of this journal.
The authors would like to thank the Key Laboratory of Xin'an Medical Ministry of Education and Anhui University of traditional Chinese medicine for their efforts to complete this study.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]