All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Regeneration of Genomes using DNA Sequences

Bremks Anthony*

Department of Microbiology, National Tsing-Hua University, Taiwan, China

*Corresponding Author:
Bremks Anthony
Department of Microbiology,
National Tsing-Hua University,

Received: 21-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. JMB-22-84035; Editor assigned: 24-Nov-2022, PreQC No. JMB-22-84035(PQ); Reviewed: 08-Dec-2022, QC No. JMB-22-84035; Revised: 15-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. JMB-22-84035(R); Published: 22- Dec-2022, DOI: 10.4172/2320-3528.11.7.003.

Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology


Genome-resolved metagenomics enables bacterial genomes to be reconstructed from DNA sequence data derived from complex microbial mixtures. The metagenome-assembled genomes derived from such a process can be annotated to predict their functional toolbox upon which microbiome-level functional analyses can be conducted. One of the main issues of this methodology is that metagenome-assembled genomes usually have different levels of genome completeness, which means the entirety of a microbes DNA is not always captured in the reconstructed genome. Genome completeness is primarily estimated through the presence of single-copy core genes, which are expected to be found in most bacteria. It is common to use metagenome-assembled genomes with completeness values as low as seventy percent for the functional analyses of microbial communities. However, if a genome is estimated to be seventy percent complete, it is probable that many of the functions encoded in the actual genome will not be captured in the metagenome-assembled genomes and thus the functional capacity of the genome will be underestimated. Not accounting for the level of completeness of metagenome-assembled genomes could therefore lead researchers to incorrect interpretations of results, such as the artefactual deficit of functions being misinterpreted as real biological signal.

When bacteria switch from facultatively parasitic or free-living life cycles to a permanently host-dependent state, they lose a significant number of genes. The mycoplasmas and associated bacteria fall toward the lower end of the spectrum in terms of bacterial genome size. Contrary to earlier theories, early molecular phylogenetic investigations showed that mycoplasmas represented an evolutionary derived condition. Furthermore, it is now understood that genome shrinkage in obligately host-associated bacteria occurs in many different forms, with mycoplasmas being just one of them. Numerous substances needed for metabolism can be obtained by host-dependent bacteria from the cytoplasm or tissue of the host. They are then capable of eliminating their own metabolic pathways and related genes. Many of the specific gene losses are explained by this elimination.

As there are not enough genes that are universally maintained to support autonomous cellular development and replication, tiny genome organisms must accomplish these feats by utilising a variety of genes. Nonorthologous gene displacement is a portion of how this is accomplished. In other words, a gene that performs one function is replaced by a gene that performs a different function. There is no longer redundant DNA ancestral genome. The amount of chromosomal deletions present in the descendant tiny genome depends on the degree of genome reduction. One of the processes in evolution is selection. The sizes of different types of bacteria genomes can be explained by two more important mechanisms. Gene duplication and horizontal or lateral gene transfer likely to involve large-scale genetic material transfers during insertions. In the absence of selection constraint, genomes will often become smaller, assuming the absence of these mechanisms.

Bacteria that are free-living typically have enormous populations for gene transfer. As a result, selection can be used to remove harmful sequences from free-living bacteria, producing a relatively modest number of pseudogenes. Continued selective pressure is visible since free-living bacteria are required to create all gene products without the aid of a host. It makes sense that free-living bacteria would develop the largest bacterial genomes of all the bacteria kinds since there is ample chance for gene transfer to occur and selective pressures against even marginally detrimental deletions. The smallest genome sizes are found in obligatory parasites and symbionts as a result of the long-lasting consequences of deletional bias. The selective pressure on parasites that have evolved to inhabit particular habitats is quite low. Genetic drift thus dominates the evolution of microorganisms that are specialised for particular niches. The majority of unnecessary sequences are removed with prolonged exposure to deletional bias. Symbionts are much less common and have the worst bottlenecks of any bacterial kind. Endosymbiotic bacteria have essentially no moment for gene transfer, leading to high genome compaction.

This does not imply that all bacterial genomes are becoming smaller and less complicated. There are still a tonne of bacteria whose genome sizes have been preserved or even grown over ancestral states, despite the fact that many different species of bacteria have shrunk from an ancestral form. Large populations, rapid production rates and a relatively high likelihood of gene transfer are all characteristics of free-living bacteria. While deletional bias tends to eliminate pointless sequences, selection can play a substantial role in the evolution of new genes and processes in free-living bacteria.