Review on Ankle fractures and its medication

Abstract

Lower leg wounds are basic and record for more than five million crisis office counsels yearly. Curiously, 85% of these lower leg wounds are lower leg sprains and the staying 15% are lower leg cracks. General lower leg cracks constitute 9% of breaks and are the most widely recognized wounds including articular surface of a weight bearing joint. Frequently, lower leg breaks are disengaged wounds and up to one in four will require surgical intercession.

Keywords

Wounds, Ankle Fractures, Sprains.

Introduction

Lower leg wounds are basic and record for more than five million crisis office counsels yearly [1-5]. Curiously, 85% of these lower leg wounds are lower leg sprains and the staying 15% are lower leg cracks [6-8]. General lower leg cracks constitute 9% of breaks and are the most widely recognized wounds including articular surface of a weight bearing joint [9,10]. Frequently, lower leg breaks are disengaged wounds and up to one in four will require surgical intercession. One in twenty lower leg breaks are connected with different cracks. Patients with polytrauma, who survived their underlying wounds, will probably experience the ill effects of utilitarian debilitation if foot and lower leg wounds were likewise present [11-15].

The normal age of a patients is 46, despite the fact that there is a bimodal age dispersion with tops in more established females and youthful guys. There has been a three-fold ascend in rate in the more established females in the course of recent decades due to a maturing populace [16-19]. There has likewise been a surge in the quantity of open lower leg cracks amongst the elderly after low vitality injury, for example, a tumbles from standing tallness. Lower leg breaks are an expanding issue because of the expanding maturing populace [20-23].

Signs and symptoms of a broken ankle include: pain, swelling, bruising, deformities of the bones around the ankle, pale skin around the foot, numbness, or an inability to move the toes.

Anatomy

The ankle joint is a complex hinge joint consisting of the distal part of the tibia and fibula which articulate with the body of the talus. The majority of articulation occurs between the surface of the talus and tibial plafond. The posterior part of the tibial plafond forms the posterior malleolus, the medial distal tibia forms the medial malleolus and distal fibular forms the lateral malleolus. This joint is capable of plantar-flexion, dorsi-flexion as well as sliding and rolling movements. It is most unstable in plantar flexion as the talus is narrowest posteriorly and most injuries occur in this position [24-26].

The ankle joint is vital for maintaining posture and ambulation. The congruency and stability of the joint are maintained by a combination of the bony components, surrounding ligaments, tendons, musculature and joint capsule. The lateral ligament is composed of three structures: the anterior and posterior talofibular ligament with the calcaneofibular ligament running between them. Medially, the deltoid ligament which is made up of a superficial part attached to the medial malleolus, talar neck and calcaneum and the deep part which is attached to the medial malleolus and talus. The deltoid is the stronger ligament and its disruption influences the management of ankle fracture. The distal tibia and fibula form a fibrous joint called the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis, which is made up of four ligaments and two bones. The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis contributes to ankle stability and maintains the anatomical position of the ankle to form the ankle mortise.

Classification

It was Percival Pott who developed the first classification system for ankle fractures describing the injury by the number of malleoli involved thus unimalleolar, bimalleolar and trimalleolar fractures [27-29]. The Danis-Weber classification was first developed by Danis in 1940 and later modified by Weber in 1966 (Table 1). It is based upon the level of the distal fibula fracture. The higher the fibular fracture, the greater the risk of instability and need for surgical intervention. Although this is a simple classification it does not take into account injury to medial structures [30,32].

An alternative classification system, devised by Lauge-Hansen in 1950, was based upon the position of the foot at the time of injury and the direction of the deforming force and noted the subsequent fracture pattern in freshly amputated limbs. The injury is governed by two factors, firstly the position of the foot (pronation or supination) and secondly the direction of force (abduction, adduction or external rotation). This system predicts the bone and soft tissue injuries and pioneered the way for the closed treatment of ankle fractures [33].

Clinical Presentation

The most widely recognized reason for lower leg breaks is a fall (37.5%), trailed by reversal wounds (31.5%) and afterward wears related wounds (10.2%) [3]. Diabetic patients may give a past filled with minor injury or may not review injury at all on the off chance that they have fringe neuropathy. High vitality wounds with hub stacking may bring about more genuine tibial plafond, or pilon breaks, and compartment disorder of the leg [34-35]. Patients will much of the time present with torment, wounding, swelling of the lower leg and powerlessness to weight tolerate. Patients with an open damage, separation or the nearness of neurovascular bargain must be recognized. Territories of maximal delicacy ought to be recognized including the malleoli and palpation the whole fibula to avoid a Maisonneuve damage (related high fibular crack), deltoid tendon and midfoot for related wounds [36-40].

It is critical to note other medicinal comorbidities, for example, diabetes, smoking and fringe vascular illness, all of which can prompt postponed bone union and poor injury recuperating. Diabetic patients are at specific danger with fringe neuropathy and require very much cushioned throws and customary skin review. The patient's social history ought to likewise be recorded including versatility status and utilitarian prerequisites to help in individual customized care [41,42].

Investigation

The primary mode of investigation is a standard radiological series of the ankle including an anterior-posterior (AP) view, lateral view and mortise view. The mortise view is taken with the foot internally rotated by 15 degrees thus the X-ray beam is perpendicular to the intermalleolar line, demonstrating the ankle mortise, an area of equidistant joint space between the tibial plafond and talar dome. The lateral view also visualizes the posterior malleolus. In cases where there is clinical tenderness of the proximal leg then full-length radiographs of the tibia and fibula are obtained to detect a Maisonneuve injury. In more complex cases, including those affecting the tibia articular surface or growth plate, more detailed imaging may be required in the form of computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Treatment

The standards of treatment are to reestablish anatomical arrangement and joint congruity to guarantee solidness, which will thusly decrease long haul confusions. This includes pressing decrease of horribly dislodged or disengaged joints in the crisis office with documentation of neurovascular status previously, then after the fact diminishment. Starting immobilization in a support or cast is connected with a check X-beam. Complex cracks including the tibial plafond, bone and related delicate tissue harm may require further imaging. Open cracks require lockjaw prophylaxis and anti-toxin scope. Debridement, expulsion of any remote material and flushing of the zone ought to be embraced as the most punctual however most secure time. This lessens the bacterial burden in the injury subsequently minimizing the possibility of contamination. In the event that there is a deferral in authoritative administration because of open injuries an outer fixator might be utilized to keep up the diminishment [41-47].

Height and Ice

Swelling is regularly seen after a lower leg break. By constraining the measure of swelling, the torment from the lower leg crack can be diminished and promote harm to the encompassing delicate tissue might be forestalled. Raising the lower leg and what tops off an already good thing can constrain swelling [48-50].

Support

A brace may should be put to bolster the broken lower leg. The support for the most part stays for a few days. A prop takes into account space to suit swelling. On the off chance that the harmed lower leg is not uprooted, the prop might be connected quickly without moving the broken lower leg. In any case, if the bones are uprooted and/or the lower leg joint is disjoined, a shut decrease is performed while the brace is set. This treatment includes setting the tibia and/or fibula bones and lower leg joint to enhance the position and torment at the lower leg. This treatment may require some kind of anesthesia [51-57].

Rest

Most patients require some time of rest with no weight being put upon the lower leg. Braces, walkers and wheelchairs permit patients to keep weight off of the lower leg. Numerous elements can figure out which is the best decision for an individual patient. The kind of lower leg crack will decide when patients can begin to stand and stroll on their harmed lower leg. As a rule, a patient won't have the capacity to put any weight on the lower leg for a few days, weeks or even months. This is a determination that must be made by an orthopedic foot and lower leg authority [58-63].

Fracture Boot Immobilization

Some lower leg cracks can be dealt with without surgery. These are typically wounds where one bone is insignificantly uprooted. Such breaks can be dealt with basically with a time of immobilization. Once the underlying swelling enhances over the initial a few days, either a cast or a break boot can be connected to the lower leg to appropriately secure and immobilize it. Both a cast and a boot can give satisfactory security to the lower leg. A cast can't get wet or be evacuated without exceptional instruments. A boot can be expelled for showering and resting. The kind of break and the doctor's judgment will decide the best sort of immobilization. The cast or boot is worn until the break is completely mended, which as a rule takes a few months [64-69].

Surgery

Regardless of whether a patient requires surgery will to a great extent rely on upon the presence of the lower leg joint on the X-beam and the particular sort of crack. Gravely uprooted breaks and cracks of both the tibia and fibula ordinarily require surgery. Reestablishing arrangement of the broken bone is vital to full recuperation since lower leg joint inflammation can happen if a crack mends disgracefully [70-75]. The most ideal approach to minimize the danger of joint inflammation is to reestablish the lower leg to as near typical as could reasonably be expected.

The surgical treatment is known as an open lessening and interior obsession or ORIF. An external or horizontal cut is made at the lower leg if the fibula bone is broken. An internal or average entry point is made at the lower leg if the distal tibia bone is broken. The harmed bones are set legitimately through these cuts and kept set up with metal plates and screws. As the lower leg mends after surgery, the joint is ensured with confined action and a cast or crack boot. The cast or boot is worn until the break is completely recuperated, which as a rule takes a few months [76-80].

Non agent Treatment

Breaks that are viewed as steady can be dealt with conservatively in a cast or moonboot for a time of no less than six weeks [24]. Stable breaks incorporate those with a detached undisplaced average or horizontal malleoli cracks without noteworthy talar shift (under 4 mm). Back malleolus cracks are additionally treated non-operatively on the off chance that they include under 25% of the articular surface [1]. The upsides of non-surgical mediation are less danger of wound complexities, blood clumps and sedative related inconveniences. In any case, the principle disadvantage of moderate administration is that patients require consistent catch up with serial radiographs to guarantee crack arrangement is kept up [81-85].

Agent Treatment

Shaky breaks are dealt with surgically unless contraindicated by noteworthy co-morbidities. The sign for surgery incorporate; open breaks, temperamental (bimalleolar cracks) or uprooted break and those with neurovascular bargain. Back malleolar cracks ought to be altered if the section is more than a quarter century of the joint surfaces of the distal tibia as saw on a parallel radiograph. Some may battle that this worth is hard to translate by means of radiographs [86-90].

Agent administration of lower leg breaks for the most part incorporates open decrease and inward obsession, utilizing plates and screws. Elective methods incorporate the utilization pressure band wires or outer fixators in complex breaks. Outer fixators are frequently utilized as a part of open cracks with huge comminution that are not amiable to other obsession techniques and in addition high vitality periarticular breaks such lower leg pilon or tibial level fractures. It is critical amid surgery of lower leg breaks to evaluate the tibiofibular syndesmosis and intraoperatively the snare test, can be utilized to survey the uprightness of the syndesmosis. Nearness of tibiofibular diastasis is may show syndesmotic interruption. The ideal obsession for the syndesmosis has not been characterized yet. There is no agreement on what number of cortices ought to be locked in, the perfect screw size, screw piece, the ideal level of position over the tibial plafond [25]. Ordinarily, a 3.5 mm or 4.5 mm cortical screw are utilized yet this is regularly administered by the specialist's inclination [26]. It has been appeared in a few studies the utilization of two cortical screws more than one diastasis screw gives more grounded build biomechanically [27,28]. The 4.5 mm cortical screw gives critical backing against powers following up on the syndesmosis amid strolling [29]. Be that as it may, at times, the syndesmosis screw might be evacuated before full weight bearing at six to eight weeks however a few studies have demonstrated no advantage as far as dreariness when leaving the sink situ.

A contrasting option to screw obsession is the utilization of the Tightrope which comprises of a non-biodegradable wire held set up by two cortical metal catches at either end. This doesn't routinely require expulsion, hence killing dangers of second analgesic and potential cost sparing. The downside with this strategy is that a few patients create organic response to the material. Post operatively, the patients are explored in the break center and remain non weight bearing for no less than six weeks [91,94].

Intricacies and Risk of Arthritis

Basic confusions post lower leg breaks incorporate joint inflammation, solidness, DVT and thrombophlebitis, disease, malunion, non-union and synostosis arrangement. The danger of these inconveniences fluctuates and is reliant upon the underlying crack example, speed of harm, nature of adjustment and patient components. [7,35,36].

In patient with lower leg joint inflammation, it has been accounted for that up to 70% have had a past filled with a lower leg damage. Post traumatic osteoarthritis is the most widely recognized inconvenience after a lower leg break and is the most well-known sign for lower leg arthrodesis [37,38]. The lower leg joint has a little surface zone and bears a considerable measure of weight per unit region and consolidated with the intricate movement of the lower leg, in congruency can bring about wear of the ligament and ligament changes. The more serious the break, the more affirmed the joint changes. Eighty percent of patients with stable wounds will be asymptomatic following eighteen years. In correlation, 20% of patients with insecure wounds that experience agent obsession had radiographically indications of joint inflammation following six years keeping in mind 80% of patients oversaw conservatively had radiographically changes following six years [11,39].

Patients with diabetes, fringe vascular infection, osteoporosis, corpulence and those that smoke are connected with a higher danger of poorer results taking after a lower leg crack obsession because of a blend of components including poor blood supply, poor bone mending, poor injury recuperating and the higher weight load through the break obsession [40,41]. Diabetics particularly represent a test with expanded danger of contamination and equipment disappointment because of disease, neuropathy, ulcers and poor bone stock. Indeed, even amongst diabetics, those with neuropathy are 7.63 times more inclined to encounter an injury complexity than those without neuropathy. The requirement for further surgery and the improvement of a Charcot neuropathy is likewise higher in diabetics with the potential danger of a removal [95-97].

Medication

Paracetamol and Codeine

Paracetamol is useful to ease pain. It is best to take paracetamol regularly, for a few days or so, rather than every now and then. An adult dose is two 500 mg tablets, four times a day. If the pain is more severe, a doctor may prescribe stronger painkillers such as codeine, which is more powerful, but can make some people drowsy and constipated.

Anti-inflammatory Painkillers

These medicines are also called non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). They relieve pain and may also limit inflammation and swelling. You can buy some types (e.g. ibuprofen) at pharmacies, without a prescription. You need a prescription for some others - e.g. naproxen. Side-effects sometimes occur. Stomach pain, and bleeding from the stomach, are the most serious. Some people with asthma, high blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure may not be able to take anti-inflammatory painkillers. So, check with your doctor or pharmacist before taking them, to make sure they are suitable for you.

There has been debate about whether anti-inflammatory painkillers may delay healing. This is partly because some inflammation is a necessary part of the healing process, and partly because they may very slightly increase bleeding. Current advice from UK guidelines is to put off taking this type of painkiller until 48 hours after the actual injury, when bleeding should have completely stopped. If you take anti-inflammatory medication, ibuprofen is recommended as the one least likely to cause side-effects.

Rub-on (topical) Anti-inflammatory Painkillers

Again, there are various types and brands of topical anti-inflammatory painkillers. You can buy one containing ibuprofen or diclofenac at pharmacies, without a prescription. You need a prescription for the others. There is debate as to how effective rub-on anti-inflammatory painkillers are compared to tablets. Some studies suggest that they may be as good as tablets for treating sprains. Other studies suggest they may not be as good. However, the amount of the medicine that gets into the bloodstream is much less than with tablets, and there is less risk of side-effects [98,99].

Conclusion

Lower leg breaks are basic wounds. Indeed, even with a sound comprehension of the life structures, biomechanics and standards of obsession, they can in any case be a test to oversee. We have displayed an audit of the general administration and normally experienced complexities. The most widely recognized intricacy is post traumatic osteoarthritis. Diabetic patients and elderly patients are more at danger of specific intricacies including contamination and disappointment of delicate tissue and bone mending. Understanding the related dangers with both non agent or agent administration and fitting administration to the necessities of the patient will guarantee better results for the patient

References

1. Santos MJ. Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Arthritis Outcomes. J Arthritis. 2012;1:e106.
2. Attia HMA. Tocilizumab and Regression of Rheumatoid Nodules in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2 Case Report. Rheumatology (Sunnyvale). 2012;S5:009.
3. Ota S,, et al. A Comparison of Knee Joint Biomechanics during Gait and Cartilage T2 Mapping Values in Asymptomatic Women in their Twenties and Forties. J Arthritis. 2015;4:143.
4. Topa G,, et al. Analgesic Effect of Textile Supports with Static Field Magnets in Patients with Osteoarticular Pain Syndrome: Results of a Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind Clinical Trial. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2015;4:183.
5. Bhat SA,, et al. Osteolytic Metatarsal Lesion: A Case of Foreign Body Foot. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2015;4:186.
6. Carlile GS. A Review of Competency Based Orthopaedic Training in the UK: A Trainee’s Perspective. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2014;3:178.
7. Kyo H, et al. Atopic Dermatitis as a Potential Portal of Septic Arthritis. J Arthritis. 2014; 3:135.
8. Stephens D, et al. The Holster Sign: An Overlooked Cutaneous Finding in the Diagnosis of Dermatomyositis. J Arthritis. 2015;4:145.
9. Mykola V, et al. Hematological Abnormalities in Ukrainian Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Arthritis. 2015;4:146.
10. Wilson C, et al. Worldwide Links betweenProteus mirabilisand Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Arthritis. 2015; 4:142.
11. Ajuied A, et al. Saw Cut Accuracy in Knee Arthroplasty–An Experimental Case-Control Study. J Arthritis. 2015;4:144.
12. McGrath A, et al. A Comparison of Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Competitors in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis. J Arthritis. 2013;2:108.
13. Khalid KE, et al. Aberrant Regulation of Interleukin 18 Binding Protein A (IL-18BPa) by IL-18BPa Autoantibodies in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Arthritis. 2014;3:140.
14. Lin YJ, et al. Neutropenic Enterocolitis Associated with Methotrexate Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report. J Arthritis. 2014;3:126.
15. Feldman M and Sbong S. Is CRP, like ESR, Age and Gender Dependent?. Rheumatology (Sunnyvale). 2014; 4: 134.
16. Theofilou P. Psychological Impact of Rheumatoid Arthritis on Patients Health - Related Quality of Life. J Arthritis.2012;1:e102.
17. Kitahama M, et al. Causes of Death in Autopsied Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan. J Arthritis. 2013;2:115.
18. Shimada W, et al. Alcohol Intake Improves Adherence of Pregabalin and Tramadol/Acetaminophen to RA and OA Patients. Rheumatology (Sunnyvale). 2014;S5:005.
19. Wen-yi F, et al. Efficacy of Combination Therapy with rhTNFR:Fc and Methotrexate in the Patients with Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug -resistant Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Arthritis. 2012;1:104.
20. Machon V, et al. Platelet-Rich Plasma in Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis Therapy: A 3-Month Follow-Up Pilot Study. J Arthritis. 2013 2:112.
21. Buyukavci R, et al. A Case with Ankylosing Spondylitis Who Developed Hodgkin Lymphoma Following Etanercept Therapy. J Arthritis. 2013;2:114.
22. Magee TH, et al. Effect of Femoral Head Diameter on Risk of Dislocation after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthritis.2013;2:109.
23. Nazera D and Anand P. Forefoot Surgery in Rheumatoid Arthritis, an Overview. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2015;4:e114.
24. Li W, et al. Intra-articular dGEMRIC in Patients Scheduled for MR Arthrography of the Hip Joint. J Arthritis. 2013;2:110.
25. Vernon H. Manipulation/Manual Therapy in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis. J Arthritis. 2013;2:e107.
26. Castañeda S and Arboleya L. Osteoimmunology: An Evolving Discipline. J Arthritis. 2013;2:e108.
27. Di Lorenzo. Intra-Articular Treatments Horizons in Osteoarthritis. J Arthritis. 2012;1:e101.
28. Haroon M and Fitzgerald O. Vitamin D Deficiency and its Repletion: A Review of Current Knowledge and Consensus Recommendations. J Arthritis. 2012;1:105.
29. JHacken B, et al. The Effects of Bariatric Surgery Weight Loss on Knee Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: 2 Year Follow-up. J Arthritis. 2014;3:132.
30. Yakobov E, et al. Validation of the Injustice Experiences Questionnaire adapted for Use with Patients with Severe Osteoarthritis of the Knee. J Arthritis. 2014;3:130.
31. Blanco RL, et al. The Use of a Cementless Tapered Stem in Young Patients Affected of Secondary Hip Arthritis. J Arthritis.2014;3:128.
32. Liou IH, et al. Intraarticular Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Painful Ankle Osteoarthritis-A Pilot Study. J Arthritis. 2014;3:127.
33. Singh R, et al. Swimming Breaststroke after Total Hip Replacement; Are we Sending the Correct Message. J Arthritis. 2015;4:147.
34. Hiyama Y and Okada S. Risk of Fall in Patients during the Early Months after Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthritis. 2014;3:139.
35. Coskun NC and Benlidayi IC. Non-Pharmacological Management of Hand Osteoarthritis: From A Perspective of Physiatry. J Arthritis.2014;3:141.
36. Rothschild B. Mechanical/Enthesial Origin for Ankylosing Spondylitis Axial Involvement? Clues from a Therapeutic Viewpoint. J Arthritis.2014;3:120.
37. Aly T and Ewais W. Management of 2 to 3 cm2Osteochondral Defects of the Knee with Subchondral Drilling in Patients Less than 50 Years of Age. J Arthritis. 2014;3:121.
38. Elumalai Y, et al. Comparison of Efficacy of Low Molecular Weight Heparin Versus Oral Anticoagulant in Indian Population for Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Total Knee Replacement. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2015;4: 181.
39. Rolfson O, et al. One-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Replacement is Cost-Saving. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2014;3:175.
40. Taylor M and Wood G. Revision Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty for Massive Bone Loss and Periprosthetic Fracture Using a Total Femur Prosthesis: A Case Report. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2014;3:179.
41. Marks R. Hip Flexor and Knee Extensor Muscle Strength Characteristics of Community-Dwelling Women with Recent Hip Fractures: A Case Study of Extent of Persistent Inter and Intra-limb Strength Assymetries. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2014;3:174.
42. Altindag O, et al. Serum Vitamin D Level and its Relation with Clinical Parameters in Fibromyalgia as a Neuropathic Pain. Orthopedic Muscul Syst. 2014;3:171.
43. Smith EL, et al. Concomitant Repair of Idiopathic Abductor Tears During Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Technique, Review and Outcomes. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2014;3:170.
44. Hutt JRB, et al. Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Hip Resurfacing: Evidence Based Review and Current Indications. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2014;3:173.
45. Zhang Y. Journals and Authors Should Work Together to Reduce Confusion about Vitamins. Orthopedic Muscul Syst. 2014;3:e112.
46. Litwic A, et al. Distal radius fracture: Cinderella of the Osteoporotic Fractures. Orthopedic Muscul Syst. 2014; 3:162.
47. Murphy J and Levine B. Modern Arthroplasty Treatment Options for Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Orthopedic Muscul Sys. 2014;3:152.
48. Picard F, et al. Computer Assisted Knee Replacement Surgery: Is the Movement Mainstream?. Orthopedic Muscul Syst. 2014;3:153.
49. Wong PKK and Epi GDC. Osteoporotic Fracture – When Repairing the Fracture is not enough. Orthopedic Muscul Syst. 2014;3:155.
50. Aydin N, et al. Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Orthopedic Muscul Syst. 2014; 3:159.
51. Picazo DR, et al. Not Every Limp in Childhood is Arthritis. J Arthritis. 2014;3:122.
52. EL-Shereef RR, et al. Ocular Manifestation of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and its Relation to Disease Activity. J Arthritis. 2014;3:137.
53. El Badri D, et al. Bone Mineral Density in Moroccan Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Arthritis. 2014;3:131.
54. Churchill LK and Bryant D. The Waiting Game: A Primary Care Intervention to Improve Access to Specialist Care to Patients with Osteoarthritis. Orthopedic Muscul Syst. 2014;3:158.
55. Jick S and Li L. Risk of Osteonecrosis among Persons with Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Findings from the UK based General Practice Research Database. Orthopedic Muscul Sys. 2014;S2:002.
56. Kyo H, et al. (2014) Atopic Dermatitis as a Potential Portal of Septic Arthritis. J Arthritis 3:135.
57. Noorbakhsh DS, et al. (2013) Determination the Cut off Level for Synovial S-Tream1 to Differentiate Septic from Aseptic Arthritis: A Cross Sectional Study, Tehran, Iran. J Mol Biomark Diagn 4:143.
58. García-Arias M, Pérez-Esteban S, Castañeda S (2012) Septic Arthritis and Tuberculosis Arthritis. J Arthritis 1:102.
59. García-Arias M, Pérez-Esteban S, Castañeda S (2012) Septic Arthritis and Tuberculosis Arthritis. J Arthritis 1:102.
60. Meszaros EC and Malemud CJ (2015) STAT1 is Constitutively Activated in the T/C28a2 Immortalized Juvenile Human Chondrocyte Line and Stimulated by IL-6 Plus Soluble IL-6R. J Clin Cell Immunol 6:307.
61. Komano Y, et al. (2015) Joint-Targeting Drug Delivery System for Rheumatoid Arthritis: siRNA Encapsulated Liposome. Pharm Anal Acta 6:352. doi:10.4172/2153-2435.1000352
62. Madar-Balakirski N, et al. (2015) Measurement of Cellular Immunity to Influenza Vaccination in Rheumatoid Arthritis; Comparison of Three Assays. J Vaccines Vaccin 6:278.
63. Ibrahim SE, et al. (2015) Acupuncture versus Homeopathy as a Complementary Therapy in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Int J Phys Med Rehabil 3:259.
64. Singh R, et al. (2015) Swimming Breaststroke after Total Hip Replacement; Are we Sending the Correct Message. J Arthritis 4:147.
65. McConnell J and Read JW (2014) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pre and 4 months Post 6 Physiotherapy Treatments for OA Knee Pain - A Pilot Study. Rheumatology (Sunnyvale) S16:008.
66. Ibrahim SE, et al. (2015) Acupuncture versus Homeopathy as a Complementary Therapy in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Int J Phys Med Rehabil 3:259.
67. Hicks Little CA (2014) Whole Body Vibration as a Physiotherapy Tool for Post-Traumatic Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: A Commentary. J Nov Physiother 4: 230
68. McConnell J and Read JW (2014) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pre and 4 months Post 6 Physiotherapy Treatments for OA Knee Pain - A Pilot Study. Rheumatology (Sunnyvale) S16:008.
69. Yu X, et al. (2014) Successful Treatment of Severe Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis with Double Filtration Plasmapheresis. J Clin Cell Immunol 5:222.
70. Hiyama Y and Okada S (2014) Risk of Fall in Patients during the Early Months after Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthritis 3:139.
71. Unyo C, et al. (2015) Total Hip Replacement Improves Aerobic Capacity in Osteoarthritis Patients: A Prospective Experimental Study. Int J Phys Med Rehabil 3:251
72. Hellegaard L and Hansen TB (2014) Long Term Follow Up in Patients with Radiologically Loose Trapeziometacarpal Total Joint Implants.Rheumatology (Sunnyvale) S4:011.
73. Yu X, et al. (2014) Successful Treatment of Severe Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis with Double Filtration Plasmapheresis. J Clin Cell Immunol 5:222.
74. Mahfouz RA, et al. (2014) Impact of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio on Coronary Flow Reserve and Incipient Myocardial Dysfunction in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis. J Arthritis 3:119.
75. Cestelli V, et al. (2013) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Sequential, Multiple Anti-TNF-a Agents: A Case Report. Rheumatology 3:123.
76. Miedany YEI (2012) Spondyloarthritis with Psoriasis: New Insights. J Arthritis 1:106.
77. Al-Jarallah K, et al. (2012) Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath Mimicking Nodal Osteoarthritis. J Arthritis 1:103.
78. García-Arias M, et al. (2012) Septic Arthritis and Tuberculosis Arthritis. J Arthritis 1:102.
79. Di Lorenzo (2012) Intra-Articular Treatments Horizons in Osteoarthritis. J Arthritis 1:e101
80. Theofilou P (2012) Psychological Impact of Rheumatoid Arthritis on Patients Health - Related Quality of Life. J Arthritis 1:e102.
81. JHacken B, et al. (2014) The Effects of Bariatric Surgery Weight Loss on Knee Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: 2 Year Follow-up. J Arthritis 3:132.
82. Schlesinger N and Schlesinger M (2012) Pilot Studies of Cherry Juice Concentrate for Gout Flare Prophylaxis. J Arthritis 1:101.
83. Molt M and Toksvig-Larsen S (2014) Peri-Apatite Enhances Prosthetic Fixation in Tka-A Prospective Randomised RSA Study. J Arthritis 3:134.
84. García-Arias M, et al. (2012) Septic Arthritis and Tuberculosis Arthritis. J Arthritis 1:102.
85. Al-Jarallah K, et al. (2012) Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath Mimicking Nodal Osteoarthritis. J Arthritis 1:103.
86. El Badri D, et al. (2014) Bone Mineral Density in Moroccan Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Arthritis 3:131.
87. JHacken B, et al. (2014) The Effects of Bariatric Surgery Weight Loss on Knee Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: 2 Year Follow-up. J Arthritis 3:132.
88. Castañeda S and Arboleya L (2013) Osteoimmunology: An Evolving Discipline. J Arthritis 2:e108.
89. Max Lingamfelter BS, (2014) Chronic Knee Dislocation and Flexion Contracture Treated with Open Reduction and External Fixation-A Case Report. J Arthritis 3:133.
90. Molt M and Toksvig-Larsen S (2014) Peri-Apatite Enhances Prosthetic Fixation in Tka-A Prospective Randomised RSA Study. J Arthritis 3:134.
91. Kyo H, et al. (2014) Atopic Dermatitis as a Potential Portal of Septic Arthritis. J Arthritis 3:135.
92. Danesch U, et al. (2014) NEM®Brand Eggshell Membrane Effective in the Treatment of Pain Associated with Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Results from a Six Center, Open Label German Clinical Study. J Arthritis 3:136.
93. EL-Shereef RR, et al. (2014) Ocular Manifestation of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and its Relation to Disease Activity. J Arthritis 3:137.
94. Sidebottom AJ, et al. (2014) Current Management of Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disease. J Arthritis 3:138.
95. Castañeda S and Arboleya L (2013) Osteoimmunology: An Evolving Discipline. J Arthritis 2:e108.
96. Ulucay C, et al. (2013) Arthroplasty in Ochronosis “Tips and Pearls in Surgery”: Case Series. J Arthritis 3:116.
97. Hashizume M and Mihara M (2014) Combination of High-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid and Cytokine Inhibitor Potently Inhibits Expression of Joint-Damage-Related Genes Induced By Synovial Fluid of RA Patients. J Arthritis 3:117.
98. Crosby LA (2013) Arthroplasty Treatment of Shoulder Arthritis. J Arthritis 2:e109.
99. Machon V, et al. (2013) Platelet-Rich Plasma in Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis Therapy: A 3-Month Follow-Up Pilot Study. J Arthritis 2:112.