e-ISSN: 2320-7949 and p-ISSN: 2322-0090

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Comparison between Titanium and Dental Porcelain: An Overview

Lorenzo Ferrari*, Marco Breschi

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

*Corresponding Author:
Lorenzo Ferrari
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry,
Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University,
Malmö, Sweden
E-mail: ferrari.lzo@mah.se

Received date: 08/11/2021; Accepted date: 22/11/2021; Published date: 29/11/2021

Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences


The aim of this paper are to give answers to inquiries on the best way to further develop bonding among titanium and dental porcelain and how to further execute, in clinical practice, ceramic veneered titanium as an option in contrast to ordinary metal–clay frameworks. In the mid-1970s, economically unadulterated titanium opened additional opportunities inside clinical dentistry. The justification behind this was the outcomes distributed by Brånemark. On their clinical encounters with dental inserts tons of economically unadulterated titanium. These encounters implied a leap forward for another idea of prosthetics, which from that point forward has changed the personal satisfaction of numerous patients. The justification behind this achievement originated from one property of titanium: its reactivity with oxygen, which makes it covered with an oxide layer that advances tissue similarity. Thus, titanium likewise turned into an intriguing decision as a center metal for metal pottery. Early endeavors to utilize titanium in the development of prosthetic systems were made during the 1980s. These systems were projected and expected for veneering with dental pottery. From that point forward, various creation strategies for delivering titanium prosthetics have been introduced: projecting, processing, flash disintegration, and a mix of the last two procedures with laser welding. The mechanical properties of titanium demonstrated that it was feasible to plan systems as per norms set up for metal pottery, yet the warm extension and synthetic properties of the veneering material must be acclimated to make the materials viable with titanium [1].

Titanium is a component which goes through a stage change at 882°C, which implies that the terminating temperature should be held well beneath this temperature to keep up with its unique properties and to stay away from development of a purported response layer on a superficial level. Titanium is a profoundly receptive component, and in the terminating system it is presented to oxygen, hydrogen, silica, alumina, and different substances in minor amounts, for example, tin oxide. Of these, oxygen has the most noteworthy proclivity for titanium and responds unexpectedly with it at room temperature, making an oxidized surface. Since plating is a response between metal oxides on the outer layer of the metal base and porcelain, we would likewise expect this oxidation interaction to be gainful for the holding components among titanium and porcelain. One condition for the best interface, notwithstanding, is an oxide layer with a controlled thickness. In the spearheading study on titanium earthenware production by Adachi, it was tracked down that if the oxide layer was too thick, the development would risk cracks between the titanium and the oxide layer or inside the oxide layer. Similar creators likewise observed that the oxide layer produced in the terminating system could become non-disciple during the interaction [2].

Clinical examinations, in any case, demonstrate that the pace of porcelain firm cracks is higher than the pace of glue ones and is accordingly affected by factors other than the holding among titanium and the porcelain. This demonstrates that taking care of issues with titanium ceramics can subsequently be viewed because of deficient temperature control, since heaters are not generally precise at the low terminating temperatures required for titanium–clay veneering. The couple of studies on terminating conditions satisfying the models for this review showed, from one perspective, further developed bond strength when terminating in an argon gas air and, on the other, no impact on bond strength of various firings. Since a higher terminating temperature expands the flexural strength of the actual porcelain and impacts the silica–titanium response, it is of most extreme significance to utilize the most elevated conceivable terminating temperature that doesn't influence bond strength adversely, as this will likewise improve the tasteful result. To work on the conditions for porcelain veneering of titanium, investigations of the exactness of heater temperatures would be of worth [3].

Enhancements in the clay material used to facade titanium and in the techniques and materials for adjusting the titanium surface have clearly been made, yet experience with the unremarkable creation of titanium earthenware production clarifies that there are essential taking care of issues that should be tended to. Issues, for example, the terminating precision of the heaters, the consequences for bond strength when terminating at sequential temperatures, and techniques for the legitimate cleaning of the titanium surface would likewise give significant direction to the research centers engaged with the treatment of titanium pottery. It can likewise be expressed that current information with respect to the materials and techniques for further developing security strength has not been carried out by the makers of titanium pottery, maybe due to little premium from the market. Notwithstanding, there are motivations to accept that titanium–earthenware rebuilding efforts will turn into a significant clinical idea [4].