Research & Reviews: Journal of Material Sciences
MenuISSN:2321-6212
ISSN:2321-6212
Syed Muhammad Imran1, Ihsan Iqbal1, Manwar Hussain2*
1 Department of Chemical Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore, Pakistan
2 Department of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
Received: 08-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. JOMS-23-101899; Editor assigned: 12-Jun-2023, PreQC No. JOMS-23-101899 (PQ); Reviewed: 26-Jun-2023, QC No. JOMS-23-101899; Revised: 03-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. JOMS-23-101899 (R); Published: 10-Jul-2023, DOI: 10.4172/2321-6212.11.3.005.
Citation: Imran SM, et al. The Influence of Micro to Nano-Cellulose-Clay on the Mechanical Properties of Biodegradable Polypropylene Nanocomposites. RRJ Mater Sci. 2023;11:005.
Copyright: © 2023 Imran SM, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Journal of Material Sciences
To improve the physical, mechanical, and biodegradable properties of Polypropylene (PP) nanocomposites it is important to add second- or third-phase fillers. In this study unique hybrid bio-nanocomposites were fabricated using microparticle cellulose powder from wastepaper with a Polypropylene (PP) polymeric matrix using a low-shear chaotic mixing method. A small amount (2%-5%) of layered micro clay was also added to investigate the hybrid effect of nanocomposites fabrication on the mechanical properties. A low-shear chaotic melt mixing method induces the formation of nano cellulose structures and layered clay nanoparticles via exfoliation. The nanoparticles were characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Mechanical properties were investigated using an Izod impact tester (IZ), and a Dynamic Mechanical Testing Analyzer (DMTA). Further, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used to observe the microstructure of the nanocomposites. In addition, Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) were conducted to investigate the crystallinity and degradation of the samples, respectively. The addition of wastepaper cellulose powder below 2.5 wt.% did not improve the mechanical properties, however, improvements were observed when more than 5 wt.% wastepaper cellulose powder was added. With the addition of a small amount of nano-clay, the mechanical properties were significantly improved, and a synergistic effect could be noticed. The application areas can also cover lead production in paper cups and vacuum foaming.
Nano-cellulose; Nanocomposites; Mechanical properties; Biopolymers
Bio nanocomposites are cutting-edge materials with many benefits having potential in biomedical applications like bone fillers, antimicrobial agents, drug delivery and tissue engineering. To date, the primary challenge for scientists to solve expanding environmental consciousness, is the development of bio-based nanomaterials and nanocomposites that contribute to a cleaner and more sustainable environment [1-5]. Currently, cellulose fibers derived from natural sources have received significant attention as potential alternatives to the large-scale production of biodegradable plastics. Additionally, cellulose fibers or powders can be used to enhance the properties of plastics by incorporating them as a secondary phase. Cellulosic raw materials offer different options in the production of biodegradable polymers, such as sawdust, rice husks, natural cotton, sisal fibers, and wood cellulose [6,7].
Many scientists have researched the structures and morphology of cellulose composites and discovered that cellulose is a long-chain polymer made by the linkage of smaller polymers. The link in the cellulose chain consists of poly-(1,4)-D-glucose [8], and the glucose unit residue has the potential to link through condensation to form a polydisperse linear polymer combining the -H and -OH groups [9]. Typically, cellulose chains have a high potential for polymerization owing to the presence of numerous hydroxyl groups. However, it can be challenging to measure the chain length by analyzing the mechanical and degradation properties because of molecular weight distribution and variety of degradation mechanisms. Additionally, the presence of a hydrophilic group such as a hydroxyl functional group renders cellulose compounds more hydrophilic and limits their ability to bond with the polymeric matrix. Using cellulose particulates as a secondary component with non-biodegradable polymeric materials can result in a biodegradable composite material [10-13].
At optimal processing conditions, cellulose materials derived from agriculture have been widely reported by many researchers to be effective replacements for inorganic/mineral-based fillers, such as Talc, TiO2, CaCO3, MgO, and Mg2 (OH)3, in thermoplastics [14-16]. Incorporating long natural fibers, such as jute, as reinforcements in thermoplastics has environmental advantages, improved mechanical properties, lower weight, and higher cost effectiveness. Recycling cellulose-filled thermoplastic composites is also simpler and more cost-efficient than recycling composites reinforced with inorganic fillers [17,18]. However, cellulose materials have limitations in mass production and industrial use because of the poor bonding between the cellulose fiber and the polymeric matrix. To overcome this, the use of surface treatments and compatibilizers is crucial [19-24].
Because polymeric materials are widely used in packaging, textile and in medical devices, incorporating cellulose materials as a secondary phase to improve biodegradability can be a practical and effective solution. Using recycled cellulose from paper waste contributes to creating a cleaner and more sustainable environment. Developing multi-layered silicates modified with organic molecules and polymeric materials is a new approach to creating high-performance nano polymers [25-29]. Layered silicate is commonly blended with various polymers, primarily polyethylene and polypropylene nylon, using traditional melt-mixing extruder machines. Researchers have suggested ways to increase the interlayer distance of clay minerals containing silicate using treated organic molecules to make it easier for monomers to penetrate the interlayer space within the silicate clay minerals [30].
There are three common methods for creating polymer-clay nanocomposites: melt compounding, solution processing, and in situ intercalation polymerization. In the typical melt compounding technique, polymer pellets and clay are extruded to produce polymer-clay nanocomposites via high-shear mixing. Owing to the high shear and brief mixing time, the clay particles are not detached from their bonded layered structure, resulting in intercalated clay composites which typically exhibit poor mechanical properties. A low-shear mix melting method is required to achieve a high level of nano-clay dispersal into the polymeric matrix and exfoliate the clay layers [31,32]. The main goal of this study was to fabricate hybrid biodegradable polymeric nanocomposites using the low-shear chaotic melt compounding method and microcellulose recycled powder from used paper with the addition of a small amount of nano-clay for a synergistic effect. Thus, the use of recycled paper can also reduce the threat of global pollution. The mechanical properties of the nanocomposites were investigated, evaluated, and discussed. The chemical structure of the cellulose fiber is shown in Figure 1. A few hydroxyl functional groups are observed in the cellulose structure, which are responsible for polymeric bonding.
Figure 1: Cellulose fiber’s chemical structure.
The cellulose powder was collected from Eco Research Institute (ERI), Japan. Micron-sized paper powder was fabricated using the super cryogenic technique, as mentioned by ERI. Polypropylene BX-3900 was purchased from SK Chemical, Korea, and nano-clay 93A was obtained from Shinil Chemical Korea. The toughening agent EG 8407 was purchased from Dow chemicals. Other supporting materials such Ethanox and EV were used as antioxidants and thermal stabilizers, respectively, and used as is.
Composites fabrication
Cellulose nanocomposites were fabricated by the polymer melt chaotic mixing method using a twin extruder. All raw materials with defined weight percentages were premixed and added to the extruder hopper. Table 1 shows the composite component ratios and their respective nomenclature. Ethanox and EV were used as antioxidants and thermal stabilizers, respectively. The extruder temperature was kept at 220ºC–240ºC, which allowed the polymer matrix, cellulose, and clay to be homogeneous. The strands were cooled in water and cut using a pelletizer. A 5 mm–10 mm composite pellet was dried at 80ºC for 4 h and injected into an injection machine for the test specimen.
| Sample name | PP% | TPO EG8407 | Ethanox 310 | Ethanox-368 | EV-91 | EV-12 | Clay % | Cellulose powder% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP-1 | 79.96 | 20 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| SP-2 | 79.46 | 20 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 5.5 |
| SP-3 | 74.46 | 20 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 5.5 | 0 |
| SP-4 | 72.46 | 20 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 2 | 5.5 |
| SP-5 | 68.46 | 20 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 2 | 9.5 |
| SP-6 | 67.4.6 | 20 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 3 | 9.5 |
Table 1. Nanocomposites fabrication formulation.
Characterization
INSTRON USA was used to measure the flexural strength, tensile strength, and modulus. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) was performed on a Thermal Analysis (TA) instrument. The samples were heated to 120ºC and maintained isothermally for 1 h to normalize the moisture content. After air-cooling, thermal scans were performed from 40ºC to 600ºC at a heating rate of 10ºC/min. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was performed using a TA instrument (DSC Q2000). The dynamical mechanical properties of the composites were measured by DMTA FTIR and were performed using aby TA FTIR analyzer. The sample morphologies were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JEOL JSM-6330F, Japan). The impact strength of the composites was measured using an Izod impact tester (IZ). For DSC, DMTA and FT-IRm 10 gm-15 gm composites pellets were used for analysis. SEM samples were prepared from injection-molded parts, and the upper surfaces were polished.
The FTIR spectra of the nanocomposites are shown in Figure 2. The spectra of the modified composites showed distinct peaks at 2917, 1690, 1450, and 1375 cm-1. The characteristic peak of the OH group in cellulose and the presence of water molecules can be easily detected by the presence of broad peaks between 3325-3340 cm-1 [33]. OH, stretching in the region of 2900 cm-1-3000 cm-1 has also been confirmed by various researchers [34]. In the SP-1 composite, no distinct peak was observed at 3400 cm-1-3500 cm-1 for the pure PP virgin polymer.
Figure 2: FTIR spectra of the prepared samples.
SP-5.
However, a small peak was observed for all other nanocomposites. Although the peaks were very small, it indicates the presence of a small amount of OH or water molecules. The presence of a small peak might be due to the minute amount of water molecules present in the cellulose powder as they were fully dried. The distinct peaks at 2917 cm-1 can be attributed to the C-H symmetrical stretching of the PP polymeric material.
The presence of a small peak at 1640 cm-1 in SP-2-5 confirms the presence of the OH group in the cellulose backbone, whereas no such peak was observed in the PP matrix. The wide peak at 1000 cm-1-1050 cm-1 in SP-3 composites confirms the presence of inorganic clay; however, it decreased in SP-4 and SP-5 as the amount of clay was reduced from 5.5% to 2%. No characteristic hydrogen bonding peaks were observed in the FTIR analysis (Figures 3a-3c).
Figure 3: a. SEM images of cellulose powder low magnification. b. SEM images of cellulose powder high magnification. c. Cellulose composite.
Figures 3a and 3b show images of rod-like cellulose particles with primary diameters of 20 µm. These SEM images also confirmed the powdered nature of the cellulose used in the experiment. Figure 3c shows the microstructure of the composites; fractures were observed on the surface of the cellulose nanocomposites, and the white region indicates the presence of cellulose nanoparticles (Figure 3a).
Figure 4 shows the typical flexural stress-strain curves of the PP polymer matrix and its composites with cellulose and cellulose inorganic clay hybrid. The results indicate that the flexural stress of the virgin PP was higher than that of the cellulose-added composites. However, the stress increased further when a small amount of inorganic clay was added. Maximum stress was observed in SP-5 composites when 9% of cellulose was added, demonstrating the synergetic effect of cellulose and the inorganic clay. The lower flexural strength of the 5.5% cellulose sample could be attributed to the inhomogeneous dispersion of cellulose into the polymeric matrix.
Figure 4: Stress-strain curve for the prepared samples.
Moreover, hydrogen or chemical bonding did not occur between the cellulose and the PP matrix, which was proven by FTIR and SEM analyses. This was also consistent with the tensile strength measurements. Figure 5 shows the tensile stress-strain curve of the composites. The SP-1 sample of virgin PP composites had a higher tensile strength than the 5.5% cellulose dispersed composites. The cellulose-inorganic clay composite SP-5 sample showed the highest tensile strength and tensile modulus. Table 2 lists the average mechanical properties after tensile testing.
| Sample name | Flexural strength Mpa | Flexural modulus Mpa | Tensile strength Mpa | Tensile modulus Mpa | Yield strain | Elongation % | Notched Izod strength kg. cm/cm2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP-1 | 27.5 | 134.8 | 18.5 | 110 | 0.16818 | 82 | 42.5 |
| SP-2 | 26 | 112.8 | 18.7 | 115 | 0.16261 | 102 | 30 |
| SP-3 | 28 | 130 | 21.75 | 120 | 0.18125 | 93 | 38 |
| SP-4 | 29 | 145 | 21 | 125 | 0.168 | 86.2 | 27 |
| SP-5 | 31 | 155 | 21.85 | 122 | 0.1791 | 79 | 25 |
| SP-6 | 28.8 | 135 | 19.5 | 120 | 0.1625 | 89 | 22 |
Table 2. Mechanical properties of the composites.
Figure 5: Tensile stress-strain curves of prepared samples.
Figure 6: Storage modulus variation with temperature.
Figures 6 and 7 show the storage moduli and Tan delta temperatures of all the samples. It was observed that the storage modulus of the PP was significantly lower than that of the cellulose and clay-dispersed composites. When 2.5% of cellulose was added, the modulus increased. Whereas when 2.5% of inorganic clay was added, the modulus increased significantly.
However, the addition of both cellulose and inorganic clay did not lead to any significant improvements. The improvement in the storage modulus by the addition of inorganic clay in sample SP-3 can be explained by the fact that inorganic clay is a rigid material. When dispersed into polymeric materials via intercalation or exfoliation, the rigidity of the polymeric matrix increases, resulting in a higher storage modulus. As the temperature increases, the clay has little influence in retaining the stiffness of PP after -60ºC. Ellis, et al. observed a similar phenomenon when he added Talc nano powder into the PP matrix [35].
The viscoelastic behavior of the polymeric materials was obtained by measuring the tan delta. The temperature dependence of the dynamic mechanical properties is shown in Figure 7. The spectra of the measured samples showed three relaxation peaks at −85ºC, −45ºC, and 50ºC–75ºC. The relaxation peak at -85ºC corresponds to the motions of small chain groups [36]. The virgin PP peak was stronger and more predominant than those of the other composites, followed by the cellulose-dispersed composites. The SP-3 composites had the highest tan delta value of the composites near −85ºC, followed by SP-2, SP-5 SP-4, and SP-1. A similar trend was also observed in the storage modulus measurements. In addition, the gamma peak was also found to be shifted at a higher temperature for filled composites, indicating reduced polymeric chain mobility with the addition of cellulose and inorganic clay.
Figure 7: Tan Delta variation with temperature.
6.
The beta relation peak followed a similar trend as the gamma relation peak. A small shift at higher temperatures is evident from the graph. However, a larger shift at higher temperatures was observed in the alpha peaks. PP composites in SP-1 showed an alpha relation peak at 50ºC, which shifted to 70ºC, 75ºC, and 100ºC for SP-5, SP-3, and SP-2 composites, respectively. The tan delta peak of SP-5, SP-3, and SP-2 composites was also much higher than that of the SP-1 composites. This phenomenon indicates that fewer polymer chains participated in this transition. The tan delta peak at lower temperatures (<-50ºC) corresponds to the presence of 20% rubbery polymer in the composition. The delta peak in this region is believed to be the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the rubbery polymer. The increase in storage modulus and shift in delta peak position suggests the physical interaction between the polymer and reinforcing agents limited the segmental polymer chain mobility in the vicinity of nano-reinforcements [37]. Similar results were observed by Jonoobi, who pointed out that the results from the viscoelastic behavior of the composites were consistent with the mechanical properties, suggesting that the reinforcing effect of nanofibers in the polymer restricted the molecular chain mobility [38]. The highest restriction was observed when only cellulose was added to the PP polymer in the SP-2 composites. The delta 2 peak, which is the Tg of the PP polymer, was observed at approximately 80ºC–90ºC. The dynamic mechanical properties of the composites are shown in Table 3.
| Sample name | Storage modulus E’(MPa) −100ºC | Storage modulus E’(MPa) −80ºC | Tg (ºC) | tan δ1 | Loss modulus E’’ TºC | tan δ2 | Loss modulus E’’(MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP-1 | 7500 | 8000 | 52 | 0.08 | 55 | 0.19 | 1425 |
| SP-2 | 18000 | 22000 | 57 | 0.14 | 100 | 0.22 | 3960 |
| SP-3 | 26000 | 33000 | 55 | 0.16 | 75 | 0.24 | 6240 |
| SP-4 | 14000 | 17500 | 52 | 0.12 | 57 | 0.2 | 2800 |
| SP-5 | 16000 | 19000 | 52 | 0.13 | 65 | 0.18 | 2880 |
Table 3. Dynamic mechanical properties of the composites.
The glass-rubber transition temperature, Tg, of cellulose-filled polymer composites is an important parameter that controls different properties of the resulting composites, such as their mechanical behavior, matrix chain dynamics, and swelling behavior. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) were used to evaluate the Tg values of the polymers and composites. In DSC experiments, Tg is generally taken as the inflection point of the specific heat increment at the glass-rubber transition. The DMA tests showed a relaxation process in this temperature range, instead of a transition process. The temperature of this relaxation process depends on both Tg and the measurement frequency, which can be taken as the temperature at the maximum peak of the internal friction factor (tan δ) or loss modulus (E’’), where E’ corresponds to the storage tensile modulus. Table 4 summarizes thed thermal properties of the composites and cellulose nanocomposites measured by DSC.
| Composites | Melting point ºC | Enthalpy of melting (J/g) ΔH | Crystallization exotherm maximum(ºC) | Enthalpy of crystallization (J/g) ΔH | Crystallinity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP-1 | 157.35 | 62.37 | 111.34 | 68.92 | 36 |
| SP-2 | 161.15 | 60.58 | 121.25 | 69.51 | 36.6 |
| SP-3 | 163.15 | 63.48 | 113.25 | 72.86 | 38.4 |
| SP-4 | 163.85 | 65.58 | 113 | 76.45 | 40.2 |
| SP-5 | 163.89 | 55.08 | 113.55 | 66.68 | 35.1 |
Table 4. DSC analysis results of the composites.
All the materials exhibited single melting endotherms and various temperatures depending on the filler content. Notably, all composites showed a higher melting temperature (Tm) than the virgin PP composite. The PP composite had a Tm of 157.35ºC, while all the cellulose and clay dispersed showed around 163ºC. The melting temperature increased with the addition of clay and cellulose materials, resulting in better thermal stability. Increased nucleation caused by the addition of filler particles produced a shift to a higher temperature of peak temperature of crystallization exotherm on cooling from the melt.
The enthalpy (ΔHm) of the PP composite (SP-1) at the transition temperature was 62.37 J/g, however, in SP-2 ΔHm where only cellulose was added, the ΔHm decreased to 60.58. On the other hand, the addition of inorganic clay (SP-3) and both additives (SP-4) led to higher ΔHm values, which indicates increased thermal stability owing to the addition of inorganic clay. The SP-2 and SP-5 composites showed a lower ΔHm compared to the others, suggesting that the loading of cellulose absorbed more energy in the melting of composites, as the ΔHm of cellulose was much lower than that of virgin PP [39].
The crystalline enthalpy (-ΔHm) of the SP-1 composite was 69.92 J/g. When cellulose was added to SP-3, its -ΔHm decreased to 69.51. Whereas with the addition of inorganic clay to SP-3, it increased to 72.86 J/g. The addition of both cellulose and clay into SP-4 increased its -ΔHm to 76.45 J/g. Further, the -ΔHm in SP-5 decreased to 66.63 J/m. These results suggest that the addition of cellulose interfered with crystallization. It is assumed that the decrease in –ΔHm was caused by the decrease in the crystal size. Lee also observed a similar behavior and suggested that clay and wood floors were responsible for crystallization, as they play a significant role as nucleating agents [40].
Table 5 lists the crystallinity (Xc) of the composites. Crystallinity was calculated using ΔH=190 J/g of virgin PP and the enthalpy of fusion obtained from the DSC curves. The crystallinity of the PP matrix in SP-1 was 36%. Further, it increased by approximately 38.4% when inorganic clay was added. Meanwhile, a decrease in crystallinity was observed when only cellulose was added to the SP-3 sample. The crystallinity was further increased by the addition of both cellulose and clay in the SP-4 and SP-5 samples. These results suggest that the viscosity of the base PP was affected by the dispersion of cellulose particles and the surface chemistry of cellulose molecules [41].
Figure 8 shows the crystallization analysis of the samples determined using CRYSTAL (Polymer Char, Spain) conducted with an Infrared (IR) detector in 1, 2, and 4-trichlorobenzene. Crystallization was carried out in a 50 mL stainless steel stirred vessel. Five crystallization vessels were installed in the main oven, a gas chromatography oven, and attached to a dual-channel optoelectronic IR detector via a rotary valve.
Figure 8: Overlay of the crystallographic analysis of the SP samples.
The sample solution of 0.15% (w/w) concentration was prepared in 1, 2, 4-Trichlorobenzene (TCB) at 150ºC and stirred continuously for 60 min. The solution was then equilibrated at 95ºC for 45 min, and subsequently crystallized at a cooling rate of 0.2ºC/min from 95ºC to 30ºC. The amount of polymer in the solutions was measured using a dual-wavelength optoelectronic IR detector. The qualitative differential composition distribution (dw/dT versus T) was obtained by numerical differentiation of the integral analog. The IR cell was heated isothermally during the entire experiment at 150ºC.
Figure 9 shows the TGA curves of all the prepared composites. The analyzed data are summarized in Table 5. The PP composite in SP-1 began degrading at approximately 400ºC and gradually decreased with 0.76% residue at 460ºC. However, the thermal stability (thermal degradation) of clay composites in SP-2 improved significantly from 400.00ºC to 428.00ºC (1st onset) but deteriorated at 450ºC with 3.78% residue. Meanwhile, composites with only cellulose (SP-2) or clay and cellulose (SP-4,5) showed early degradation around 290ºC–309ºC but the 2nd onset temperature increased around 435ºC –446ºC. Hybrid composites SP-4 and SP-5 showed a higher 2nd onset temperature. The 1st decomposition onset temperature for the composites can be attributed to the volatile decomposition products associated with cellulose molecules. However, the increase in the 2nd onset temperature might be caused by the synergetic effect of clay and cellulose, in which cellulose acted as a temperature barrier along with inorganic clay.
Figure 9: TGA curves of prepared samples.
In this study, hybrid bio-nanocomposites were fabricated using microparticle cellulose powder from wastepaper and a small amount of layered microclay with a Polypropylene (PP) polymeric matrix using a low-shear chaotic mixing method. FTIR and SEM analyses confirmed the presence of cellulose in the PP polymeric matrix. The flexural stress-strain curves demonstrated the synergetic effect of the cellulose and inorganic clay in the composites. The maximum stress was obtained in SP-5 composites when 9% of cellulose was added. The cellulose-inorganic clay composite SP-5 also showed the highest tensile strength and tensile modulus. In addition, the gamma peak was also found to be shifted at a higher temperature for filled composites, which indicates reduced polymeric chain mobility owing to the addition of cellulose and inorganic clay. In the case of SP-3 and SP-4, the DSC results of the composites showed that with the addition of inorganic clay, the ΔHm values increased, indicating an increase in thermal stability owing to the addition of inorganic clay. SP-5 composites showed a lower ΔHm compared to the others, suggesting that the loading of cellulose absorbed more energy during the melting of composites, as the ΔHm of cellulose is much lower than that of virgin PP. The TGA results also confirmed the superior thermal properties of the composites. This study confirms that with the addition of cellulose powder and a small amount of nano-clay, the mechanical properties of the composites improved significantly, and a synergistic effect was observed. Therefore, these composites can be used in a variety of biodegradable applications.