Nanoparticles: A Suitable Drug Delivery System for Cancer Treatment
Poonam Jaggi1*, Harshit Joshi2 and Jagmeet Singh3
1Department of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, New-Delhi, India
2Department of Pharmaceutics, Smriti College of Pharmaceutical Education, Indore (Madhya Pradesh), India
3Department of Biotechnology, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, India
- *Corresponding Author:
- Poonam Jaggi
Department of Biotechnology Amity University, Noida, New-Delhi India
Received date: 02/09/2016; Accepted date: 05/09/2016; Published date: 12/09/2016
Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Journal of Pharmaceutics and Nanotechnology
Application of nanotechnology in delivery of drugs is set to broaden rapidly. Currently, many drug delivery systems are under investigation for cancer therapy. Cancer in general is a disease which is characterized by the uncontrolled growth and multiplication of cancerous cells. Even though conventional therapies have enhanced patients’ survival, they also have numerous drawbacks. For example, conventional cancer chemotherapy has the therapeutic agents that distribute non-specifically in different tissues of the human body, thus affecting both cancerous as well as normal cells. This non-specific distribution of drugs to normal cells, tissues, and organs causes excessive toxicities; and thereby causing numerous adverse drug reactions including alopecia, weakness, organ dysfunction etc, causing poor quality of life for cancer patients. The pharmaceutical sciences are using nanoparticles to decrease the toxicity and side effects of drugs. Recently, studies have shown exceptional growth of investigation and applications in the field of Nano science and nanotechnology. There are promising results revealing that nanotechnology, as applied to medicine and drug delivery, can bring major progress in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer
Cancerous cells; Drug delivery;
Nanoparticles can be defined as being submicron (i.e. less then 1 micrometer) colloidal systems generally made of polymers either biodegradable or non-biodegradable polymers. According to the method of preparation of nanoparticles, Nano spheres or Nano capsules can be prepared. Nano spheres are matrix systems in which the
drug is dispersed throughout the particles [1-4]. While Nano capsules are reservoir based vesicular systems in which the drug is confined to an aqueous or oily cavity which is surrounded by a membrane usually made of a polymer .
If designed and optimized properly, nanoparticles can act as a carrier for delivery of drug to the targeted
tumor site. At the tumor level the mechanism of drug accumulation takes place by passive diffusion and by
convention across the leaky, hyper permeable tumour vasculature . The site specific targeting can also be done by active targeting . Control release of the drug can also be achieved by controlling the structure of the
nanoparticles, polymer used, and it is association with the carrier.
Nanoparticles for Tumor Tissues Targeting and Delivery
The association of a drug to conventional carrier systems causes modified drug bio distribution profile, as it is primarily carried to the mononuclear phagocytes system which includes liver, spleen, lungs and bone marrow. Once
the nanoparticle reaches into the bloodstream, conventional nanoparticles i.e. surface non-modified nanoparticles undergoes opsonisation and are massively cleared by the fixed macrophages of the mononuclear phagocytes system organs . This was illustrated in mice administered with doxorubicin incorporated into poly (isohexylcyanoacrylate) Nano spheres. Increased concentrations of the cytotoxic drug doxorubicin were found in the liver, spleen and lungs, in contrast to the counterpart mice administered with free doxorubicin . In a similar manner, when the anticancer drug actinomycin D was adsorbed on poly-(methyl cyanoacrylate) Nano spheres, higher concentration was primarily found in the lungs of the rats . However, in case actinomycin D was incorporated with a slower biodegradable poly(ethyl-cyanoacrylate) Nano spheres, than poly-(methyl cyanoacrylate) nan spheres, the accumulation of drug was primarily found in the small intestine of rats. Similarly, when vinblastine
was incorporated into the same Poly-(ethyl-cyanoacrylate) Nano spheres, the drug concentration was found at higher levels in the spleen of the rat .
Consequently, both associated drug (physicochemical properties of the drug, localization in the Nano spheres whether it is adsorbed or incorporated) as well as the polymeric composition (type of polymer, hydrophilicty-hydrophobicity; biodegradation profile) of the nanoparticles have an immense influence on the drug
distribution profile in the reticulo-endothelial organs . However, the accurate primary mechanism was not fully understood, but it was seen that this outcome was rapid (within 0.5 or 3 hours) and was found to be compatible with endocytosis as well .
Such predisposition of mononuclear phagocytes system macrophages for endocytosis/phagocytosis offers a
chance for efficient delivery of therapeutic agents to these cells, employing conventional nanoparticles. This alteration of bio distribution can be beneficial for the chemotherapeutic treatment of mononuclear phagocytes system confined tumors. For e.g., hepatocarcinoma or hepatic metastasis which arise from the digestive tract or bronchopulmonary tumors (primitive tumors or metastasis) and gynaecological cancers together with ‘non small cells tumor’ as well as ‘small cells tumors’, myeloma and leukemia. When conventional nanoparticles are employed
as carriers for chemotherapeutic agents, some degree of cytotoxicity against the Kupffer cells or other targeted macrophages can be anticipated, as the class of chemotherapeutic drugs being employed is capable to induce apoptosis in these cells [12,13]. Treatments designed for frequent administrations (with dosing intervals less than 2 weeks that is the period of restoration of Kupffer cells) could possibly result in a deficiency of Kupffer cells, which in turn could cause a decreased uptake by liver, and consequently results in decreased therapeutic efficacy of the drugs for hepatic tumors. Additionally a probable risk for bacteraemia can also not to be excluded [12-14].
In addition to this conventional carriers also target the bone marrow, which is already a significant but very unfavorable site of action for most of the chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, chemotherapy with such carriers may elevate myelosuppressive effects. Conventional nanoparticles ensure a better safety profile than free
chemotherapeutic agents, while it acts on normal tissues. For e.g., decrement of cardiac accumulation of drugs ,
in addition to genotoxicity of mitomycin C and farmorubicin [15-55] has also been related.
Since the effectiveness of conventional nanoparticles is bounded by their extensive capture by the macrophages of the mononuclear phagocytes system after IV administration, other Nano particulate mechanisms must be taken into consideration to target tumors, which are not localized in the mononuclear phagocytes system area. A great deal of research has been devoted to developing Stealth nanoparticles, which are undetected by the macrophages . Stealth nanoparticles are characterized by an extended half-life in the blood compartment [17,18,56- 59]. This allows the stealth nanoparticles to selectively extravagate into the pathological sites, like tumors with a leaky and hyper permeable vasculature. Subsequently such long-circulating nanoparticles are believed to be able to directly target most tumors located outside the mononuclear phagocytes system regions.
The size of the colloidal carriers as well as the characteristics of their surface are of chief importance for the biological fate of nanoparticles, since these parameters can avoid their uptake by macrophages of mononuclear phagocytes system. A high curvature (resulting in a small size: less than 100 nm) and/or a hydrophilic surface are
needed, in order to decrease the opsonisation reactions and consequent clearance by macrophages. A key breakthrough in the research of the nanoparticles field consisted in employing excipients like hydrophilic polymers, polyethylene glycol, polo amines, poloxamers, and polysaccharides to proficiently coat conventional nanoparticle
surface . Coatings from these excipients offer a dynamic cloud of hydrophilic and neutral chains at the particle
surface of the nanoparticles, which repels the plasma protein. Hydrophilic polymers can be attached to the surface in two ways, either by adsorption of surfactants on the surface or by introducing of block or branched copolymers. Coating the conventional nanoparticles with surfactants so as to obtain long-circulating carrier, has been the first strategy employed to direct tumor targeting in vivo [60-65].
The second approach consists of linkage of amphiphilic copolymers covalently, generally used for getting a
protective hydrophilic cloud on nanoparticles, as it avoids the likelihood of rapid coating desorption upon dilution or subsequent to contact with blood components. This methodology has been used with poly-(lactic acid) (PLA), poly-
(caprolactone) and poly-(cyanoacrylate) polymers, which were associated chemically to PEG [20–22,66,67]. Although
these co polymers have not been used until now as nanoparticles in chemotherapy of cancer, it is possible that this type of construction is extensively investigated.
Another significant approach consists in targeting the tumor with long-circulating drug carrier and then
irradiating of tumor site in case of photo dynamic therapy (PDT) [23,68-72].
Local administration: Subcutaneous or intratumoral
Contrasting to water-soluble molecules, which are quickly gets absorbed across the blood capillary wall and pass into circulation, small particles administered locally infiltrate into the interstitial space around the
administered site and are slowly absorbed by the lymphatic capillaries into the lymphatic system [24,25,73-75]. For that rationale, subcutaneously or injection given locally (in the peri-tumoral region) nanoparticles can be employed for lymphatic targeting, i.e. as a means for chemotherapy against lymphatic cancers or metastases. For e.g., the
chemotherapeutic drug aclarubicin adsorbed onto activated carbon particles was analyzed after administering it subcutaneously to mice, against a murine model (P388 leukemia cells) of lymph node metastases [26,76,77]. The
same system was also employed in subjects following intratumoral and peritumoral injections, as a local regional chemotherapy adjuvant for breast cancer . In both administrations, this carrier system showed distribution
selectively high levels of free aclarubicin to the regional lymphatic system and low levels to the rest of the body [26, 27,78-80].
Recently, inorganic nanoparticles have found to interact with biological systems have drawn extensive
attention in biology and medicine. Such nanoparticles are considered to have potential as novel intravascular probes for both diagnostic as well as therapeutic purposes. Significant issues for successful nanoparticle based
drug delivery system include the ability to target specific types tissues and cell types, and escape from the
biological particulate filter (the RES).
Amongst the inorganic materials, magnetite has been explored most extensively for cancer therapy and diagnosis [28-39,81-84]. Magnetite nanoparticles were used directly or dispersed in the polymeric matrix as cores. They have been used chiefly in the hyperthermia treatment of cancer [38,85-90] and, in some cases, for magnetic fieldassisted targeting of nanoparticles. Recently, inorganic nanoparticles have found to interact with biological systems have drawn extensive attention in biology and medicine. Such nanoparticles are considered to have potential as novel intravascular probes for both diagnostic as well as therapeutic purposes. Significant issues for successful
nanoparticle based drug delivery system include the ability to target specific types tissues and cell types, and escape from the biological particulate filter (the RES)..
Amongst the inorganic materials, magnetite has been explored most extensively for cancer therapy and diagnosis [28-39]. Magnetite nanoparticles were used directly or dispersed in the polymeric matrix as cores. They have been used chiefly in the hyperthermia treatment of cancer [38,91] and, in some cases, for magnetic field-assisted
targeting of nanoparticles. For diagnostic purposes, magnetite nanoparticles were used in magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) as contrast-enhancing agents for the purpose of diagnosis of cancer, targeted molecular imaging (TMI), hyperfusion region visualization (HRV), cell labeling in T cell-based therapy, and for detecting of angiogenesis, apoptosis as well as gene expression. Poly ethylene glycol or oxidized starch as a hydrophilic surface-modifier, antibodies, FITC-labeled Tat peptide [33-35,92-94] or the Annexin-V protein as a specific targeting agent, and folic acid or transferrin as a ligand of the receptors over-expressed in tumor cells have been used as surface molecules.
Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
A wide variety of drug carriers have been investigated as a means of improving the therapeutic efficacy of drugs. Amongst these drug carriers, liposomes have been widely studied as a drug delivery option to target tissues. Liposomes are fundamentally non-toxic, biodegradable as well as non-antigenic because they are an assembly of amphiphilic phospholipids such as phosphotidycholi, phosphotidylserine etc that are one of the constitutive
components of biomembranes. Many scientists have reported that certain drugs, including anti-tumor and antibacterial drugs, entrapped in the liposomal cavity could alter their biodistribution as well as its pharmacokinetics [40-42,95-96]; the significantly larger therapeutic advantages of these drugs have been shown.
In addition, attempts have been made to introduce antibodies and ligands onto the surface of liposomes in
turn to improve the therapeutic effect of drugs incorporated into the liposomes by enhancing the targeting efficiency [42-45,97,98].
A typical example of these liposomal drugs, the immunostealth liposome developed by Maruyama et al., designed a new type of long-circulating immunoliposome , i.e. the PEG-immunoliposome with antibodies attached at poly ethylene glycol terminals. The presence of unbounded PEG (not bonded to the antibody) does not interfere with the binding of the terminally linked antibodies to the antigens. This type of immunoliposome demonstrated better targeted delivery than the normal immunoliposomes to the targeting organ of both lung
endothelial cells and solid tumor tissue. This was caused because of the free PEG chains effectively avoiding the
RES uptake of liposomes; this resulted in the increased blood concentration and the enhanced target binding of
Lipid emulsions have also been considered as promising drug delivery system to target tissues [47-49]. An
emulsion is basically a heterogeneous mixture of two or more immiscible liquids (hydrophilic and hydrophobic) with
the emulsifier or surfactant used to stabilize the dispersed droplets. They have certain merits like good biocompatibility, biodegradability, physical stability and ease of large-scale manufacturing. In addition to this, they can include hydrophilic, hydrophobic and amphipathic drugs due to their structural characteristics. Many researchers have revealed the validity of the lipid emulsions as a parenteral drug delivery system [50-52,99]. For example, Kurihara et al. demonstrated that the lipid emulsion could be effective as an injectable carrier to achieve tumor delivery of lipophilic palmitoyl rhizoxins [50,99,100].
The development of nanoparticles as a drug delivery system is presumed to have a huge impact on the clinical
approaches for chemotherapy. The capacity to specifically target nanoparticles together with the controlled delivery of a therapeutically active agent provides a powerful new method to treat cancer. By rationally designing and optimizing nanoparticles based on advanced knowledge of cancer biology and the tumor microenvironment, better efficacy can be achieved. Additionally, nanoparticles that are capable to by-pass the RES and can to carry imaging
agents and deliver multiple drugs are now being developed for improved detection, diagnosis and treatment of
cancer. The application of nanotechnology to cancer has already produced some stimulating results and holds even
bigger promise for patients suffering from cancer in the future.
- Duncan R. The dawning era of polymer therapeutics. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2003;2:347-360.
- Subbiah R, et al. Nanoparticles: functionalization and multifunctional applications in biomedical sciences. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:4559-4577.
- Yoo JW, et al. Factors that control the circulation time of nanoparticles in blood: challenges, solutions and future prospects. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16:2298-2307.
- Koo H, et al. In Vivo Targeted Delivery of Nanoparticles for Theranosis. Acc Chem Res. 2011;2:25-26.
- Couvreur, P, et al. Nanoparticles: preparation and characterization. Drugs and the pharmaceutical sciences. 1996;73:183-211.
- Yuan, F. Transvascular drug delivery in solid tumors. InSeminars in radiation oncology. 1998;8:164-175.
- Moghimi SM, et al. Long-circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice. Pharmacological reviews. 2001;53:283-318.
- Grislain, L, et al. Pharmacokinetics and distribution of a biodegradable drug-carrier. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1983;15:335-345.
- Verdun, C, et al. Tissue distribution of doxorubicin associated with polyisohexylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 1990;26:13-18.
- Brasseur, F, et al. Actinomycin D adsorbed on polymethylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles: increased efficiency against an experimental tumor. European Journal of Cancer 1965;16:1441-1445.
- Couvreur, P, et al. Tissue distribution of antitumor drugs associated with polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 1980;69:199-202.
- Moghimi, SM, et al. Long-circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice. Pharmacological reviews. 2001;53:283-318.
- Oja C, et al. Doxorubicin entrapped within liposome-associated antigens results in a selective inhibition of the antibody response to the linked antigen. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes. 2000;1468:31-40.
- Blagoeva PM, et al. Diminished genotoxicity of mitomycin C and farmorubicin included in polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 1992;268:77-82.
- Blagoeva PM, et al. Diminished genotoxicity of mitomycin C and farmorubicin included in polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 1992;268:77-82.
- Storm G, et al. Surface modification of nanoparticles to oppose uptake by the mononuclear phagocyte system. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 1995;17;31-48.
- Stolnik SSDS, et al. Long circulating microparticulate drug carriers. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 1995;16:195-214.
- Gref R, et al. Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. Science. 1994;263;1600-1603.
- Torchilin VP and Trubetskoy VS. Which polymers can make nanoparticulate drug carriers long-circulating. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 1995;16:141-155.
- Bazile D, et al. Stealth Me. PEG‐PLA nanoparticles avoid uptake by the mononuclear phagocytes system. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 1995;84:493-498.
- Peracchia MT, et al. Development of sterically stabilized poly (isobutyl 2‐cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles by chemical coupling of poly (ethylene glycol). Journal of biomedical materials research. 1997;34:317-326.
- Peracchia, et al. Pegylated nanoparticles from a novel methoxypolyethylene glycol cyanoacrylate-hexadecyl cyanoacrylate amphiphilic copolymer. Pharmaceutical research. 1998;15: 550-556.
- Allémann E, et al. Photodynamic therapy of tumours with hexadecafluoro zinc phthalocyanine formulated in PEG‐coated poly (lactic acid) nanoparticles. International journal of cancer. 1996;66:821-824.
- Hawley AE, et al. Targeting of colloids to lymph nodes: influence of lymphatic physiology and colloidal characteristics. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 1995;17:129-148.
- Nishioka Y and Yoshino H. Lymphatic targeting with nanoparticulate system. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2001;47:55-64.
- Sakakura C, et al. Enhancement of therapeutic efficacy of aclarubicin against lymph node metastases using a new dosage form: aclarubicin adsorbed on activated carbon particles. Anti-cancer drugs. 1992;3: 233-236.
- Hagiwara A, et al. Selective drug delivery to peri-tumoral region and regional lymphatics by local injection of aclarubicin adsorbed on activated carbon particles in patients with breast cancer-a pilot study. Anti-cancer drugs. 1997;8:666-670.
- A Ito, et al. Cancer diagnosis and therapy using magnetite nanoparti-cles. Chem Eng Japan. 2003;67: 692-695.
- A Kondo and N Ohnishi. In: Frontier of Nano-biotechnology, M. Ueda (Ed), Tokyo. 2003:60-70.
- M Philbert R Weissleder, et al. A novel polyacrylamide magnetic nanoparticle contrast agent for molecular imaging using MRI, Mol Imaging. 2003;2:324-332.
- A Bjornerud, et al. Pre-clinical results with Clariscan (NC100150 Injection); experience from different disease models. MAGMA. 2001;12:99-103.
- Weissleder R. In vivo high resolution three-dimensional imaging of antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte trafficking to tumors, Cancer Res. 2003;63:6838–6346.
- L Josephson, et al. High-efficiency Intracellular magnetic labeling with novel superparamagnetic-tat peptide conjugate, Bioconjugate Chem. 1999;19:186-191.
- M Zhao, et al. Differential conjugation of tat peptide to superparamagnetic nanoparticles and its effect on cellular uptake, Bioconjugate Chem. 2002;13:840-844.
- EA Schellenberger, et al. V-CLIO: a nanoparticle for detecting apoptosis by MRI. Mol Imaging. 2002;1:102-107.
- Y Zhang, et al. Surface modification of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles and their intracellular uptake. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1553-1561.
- D Hogemann, et al. Improvement of MRI probes to allow efficient detection of gene expression. Bioconjugate Chem. 2000;11:941-946.
- MB Bally, et al. Liposomes with entrapped doxorubicin exhibit extended blood residence times. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1023:133-139.
- M Lee, et al. Pharmacokinetics and organ distribution of cyclosporin A incorporated in liposomes and mixed micelles. Int J Pharm. 1999;191:87-93.
- A Kresta, et al. Distribution of free and liposome-encapsulated cefoxitin in experimental intra-abdominal sepsis in rats, J Pharm Pharmacol. 1993;45:779-783.
- A Mori, et al. In vivo antitumor activity of cis-bis-neodecanoato-trans-R,R-1,2-diaminocyclohexane platinum(II) formulated in long-circulating liposomes. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1996;37:435-444.
- SK Huang, et al. Pharmacokinetics and therapeutics of sterically stabilized liposomes in mice bearing C-26 colon carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1992;52:6774-6781.
- J Vaage, et al. Working, Tissue distribution and therapeutic effect of intravenous free or encapsulated liposomal doxorubicin on human prostate carcinoma xenografts. Cancer. 1994;73:1478-1484.
- K Maruyama, et al. Possibility of active targeting to tumor tissues with liposomes, Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 1999;40:89-102.
- JJ Wheeler, et al. Polyethylene glycol modified phospholipids stabilize emulsions prepared from triacylglycerol. Pharm Sci. 1994;83:1558-1564.
- F Liu and D Liu. Long-circulating emulsion (oil-in-water) as carriers for lipophilic drugs. Pharm Res. 1995; 12:1060-1064.
- F Liu and D Liu. Amphipathic polyethylene glycol stabilized emulsions (o/w): Physical characterization and in vivo distribution, Int J Pharm. 1995;125:73-80.
- A Kurihara, et al. Enhanced tumor delivery and antitumor activity of palmitoyl rhizoxin using stable lipid emulsions in mice. Pharm Res. 1996;13:305-310.
- Y Wang, et al. Venous irritation, pharmacokinetics, and tissue distribution of tirilazad in rats following intravenous administration of a novel supersaturated submicron lipid emulsion. Pharm Res. 1999;16: 930-938.
- RC Maranhao, et al. Plasma kinetics and biodistribution of a lipid emulsion resembling low-density lipoprotein in patients with acute leukemia. Cancer Res. 1994;54:4660-4666.
- Elsehly EM, et al. High Efficiency of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Filters for Benzene Removal from Aqueous Solutions: Quantitative Analysis using Raman Spectroscopy. J Nanomater Mol Nanotechnol, 2016;5:3.
- Alvi S, et al. Survivability of Polyethylene Degrading Microbes in the Presence of Titania Nanoparticles. J Nanomater Mol Nanotechnol. 2016;5:3.
- Kumar R. Repositioning of Non-Steroidal Anti Inflammatory Drug (NSIADs) for Cancer Treatment: Promises and Challenges. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:e140.
- Adhikari R. Applications of Upconversion Nanoparticles in Nanomedicine. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:e141.
- Abdellatif AAH. A Novel Topical Spray Formulation for Ginkgo Bioloba for Antifungal Activity. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:386.
- Sackey J, et al. The Study of the Structural Colouration Observed in the Papilio crino Fabricius, 1792 Wings. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:387.
- Paulchamy B and Venkatesh A. Optical Response of Lead Sulfide Quantum Dots on Gamma Radiation. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:388.
- Noori A, et al. Effect of CO2 Ion Doping on Characteristics of Nanostructure Hydroxyapatite. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:389.
- Ghosh S, et al. Gloriosa superba Mediated Synthesis of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles for Anticancer Applications. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:390.
- Verma AK and Leekha A. Elucidation of Glutathione-S-transferase Activity Induced by Pectin-Cisplatin Nano-conjugates for Optimization of New Therapeutic Strategies. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:391.
- Kumar P, et al. Synthesis of Photoactive SPIONs Doped with Visible Light Activated Photosensitizer. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:392.
- Gamage NH, et al. Targeted Theranostic Approach for Glioma Using Dendrimer-Based Curcumin Nanoparticle. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:393.
- Ghosh S, et al. Barleriaprionitis Leaf Mediated Synthesis of Silver and Gold Nanocatalysts. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:394.
- Karki K, et al. Targeting Glioma with a Dual Mode Optical and Paramagnetic Nanoprobe across the Blood-brain Tumor Barrier. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:395.
- Helali S, et al. Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Using Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes Carboxlic Acid Functionalized: Detection of Copper in Tabuk-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Water. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:396.
- Christianah I, et al. Rifampicin-loaded Silver-starch Nanocomposite for the Treatment of Multi-resistant Tuberculosis. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:374.
- Moradpour M, et al. Establishment of in vitro Culture of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) from Field-derived Explants: Effective Role of Silver Nanoparticles in Reducing Contamination and Browning. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:375.
- Zaman HH. Addressing Solubility through Nano Based Drug Delivery Systems. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:376.
- Sugi H and Chaen S. Evidence against the Swinging Lever Arm Mechanism in Muscle Contraction Based on the Effect of Antibodies to Myosin Head. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:377.
- Koushik OS, et al. Nano Drug Delivery Systems to Overcome Cancer Drug Resistance - A Review. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:378.
- Jibowu T. The Formation of Doxorubicin Loaded Targeted Nanoparticles using Nanoprecipitation, Double Emulsion and Single Emulsion for Cancer Treatment. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:379.
- Thamri A, et al. Methanol, Ethanol and Acetone Sensing Using AACVD-grown Tungsten Oxide Nanoneedles. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:380.
- Hooper D, et al. A Modern Approach to the Heckel Equation: The Effect of Compaction Pressure on the Yield Pressure of Ibuprofen and its Sodium Salt. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:381.
- Heydrnejad MS and Samani RJ. Sex Differential Influence of Acute Orally-administered Silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) on Some Biochemical Parameters in Kidney of Mice Mus musculus. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:382.
- Montasser MS, et al. A Novel Eco-friendly Method of Using Red Algae (Laurencia papillosa) to Synthesize Gold Nanoprisms. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:383.
- Israel LL, et al. Ultrasound-Mediated Surface Engineering of Theranostic Magnetic Nanoparticles: An Effective One-Pot Functionalization Process Using Mixed Polymers for siRNA Delivery. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:385.
- Ghosh S, et al. Synthesis of Bioactive Gold Nanocatalyst by Gnidia glauca Leaf and Stem. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:358.
- Karthikeyan R, et al. Dendrimeric Biocides - A Tool for Effective Antimicrobial Therapy. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:359.
- AbouAitah KEA, et al. Mesoporous Silica Materials in Drug Delivery System: pH/Glutathione- Responsive Release of Poorly Water-Soluble Pro-drug Quercetin from Two and Three-dimensional Pore-Structure Nanoparticles. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:360.
- Ali SM, et al. Bioequivalence Study of Pegylated Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Liposome (PEGADRIA) and DOXIL® in Ovarian Cancer Patients: Physicochemical Characterization and Pre-clinical studies. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:361.
- Karthikeyan R, et al. Pegylated PPI Dendrimer Cored with Ethylene Diamine for Prolonged Release of Prednisolone. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:362.
- Mohsen R, et al. Design, Synthesis, Characterization and Toxicity Studies of Poly (N-Iso-Propylacrylamide-co-Lucifer Yellow) Particles for Drug Delivery Applications. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:363.
- Pereyra AS, et al. Magnetofection Enhances Adenoviral Vector-based Gene Delivery in Skeletal Muscle Cells. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:364.
- Rostam M. Assessment Effect of Surface Modification of Nano Alumina with Vinyl Trimethoxy Silane to Mechanical Properties of Vinyl Ester Resin. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016:7:365.
- Ghanbari M, et al. Study of the Cytotoxicity Effect of Doxorubicin-loaded/Folic acid-Targeted Super Paramagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on AGS Cancer Cell Line. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:368.
- Moses SL, et al. Cytotoxicity in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells, without Harming MCF-10A Healthy Cells. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:369.
- Hoskins C, et al. Investigation into Drug Solubilisation Potential of Sulfonated Calixresorcinarenes. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:370.
- Miller A, et al. Investigation into Drug Solubilisation Potential of Sulfonated Calix(4)Resorcinarenes. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:371.
- Ismail MB, et al. A Comparative Study on Surface Treatments in the Immobilization Improvement of Hexahistidine-tagged Protein on the Indium Tin Oxide Surface. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:372.
- Shafei NKA and Nour A. Observations on the Association of Serum histamine, Interleukins and other Serum Biochemical Values with Severity of Pruritus in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:345.
- Yang N, et al. An Early Cancer Diagnosis Platform based on Micro-magnetic Sensor Array Demonstrates Ultrahigh Sensitivity. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:344.
- El-Hussein A. Study DNA Damage after Photodynamic Therapy using Silver Nanoparticles with A549 cell line. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:346.
- Abbas N, et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23) Levels, Phosphate Intake and its Association with Indices of Renal Handling of Phosphate in Healthy Volunteers. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:348.
- Kumar H, et al. Potential Application of Gold Nanostructures in Photodynamic Therapy. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:349.
- Rutledge KE, et al. Modulation of Inflammatory Response and Induction of Bone Formation Based on Combinatorial Effects of Resveratrol. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:350.
- AbouAitah KEA, et al. pH-controlled Release System for Curcumin based on Functionalized Dendritic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:351.
- Sivaramasamy E, et al. Enhancement of Vibriosis Resistance in Litopenaeus vannamei by Supplementation of Biomastered Silver Nanoparticles by Bacillus subtilis. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:352.
- Patil PA, et al. Screening of Most Effective Nano Metal between AgNP, CuNP and Ag-Cu NP’s Synergistic by In vitro Antibacterial Comparison. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:353.
- Lone B. Adsorption of Cytosineon Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:354.
- 100. Dai M, et al. Engineered Protein Polymer-Gold Nanoparticle Hybrid Materials for Small Molecule Delivery. J Nanomed Nanotechnol. 2016;7:356.