Role of Pharmacoproteomics in Drug Development
Priyanka R *
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, MGR Medical University, Chennai, India
- *Corresponding Author:
- Priyanka R
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, MGR Medical University, Chennai, India
Received date: 13/05/2015 Accepted date: 10/06/2015
Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Journal of Pharmaceutics and Nanotechnology
Proteomics primarily could be a subdiscipline of functional genomics that measures the qualitative and quantitative changes in protein content of a cell or tissue in response to treatment or disease and determines protein–protein interactions. As a complementary approach to mRNA expression technologies, proteomics more and more is being applied to drug discovery process . The pharmaceutical trade has expressed important interest in proteomics, with the expectation that this technology can result in the identification and validation of protein targets and, finally to the invention and development of effective drug candidates .
Proteomics are divided as two main areas i.e. (i) Expression Proteomics, (ii) Functional Proteomics. The role of Expression Proteomics is the Analysis of various protein expressions by protein quantitation and identification. This protein analysis compares the expression profile of proteomes of cells, tissues or organisms in any condition of health problem, disease, injury, treatment, or intoxication to a standard proteome. Functional proteomics explains about the normal and abnormal interactions of proteins . Isolation of protein complexes include Gene transcription, protein degradation, signal transduction, and cell cycle regulation to be done by multi protein complexes. There are different types of protein-protein interactions such as Isolation of Protein complexes, Yeast-2-Hybride method, Organelles [4 - 8].
Pharmacoproteomics is an important tool of proteomic method to discovery of drug, development of drug, drug response at cellular tissues. In pre-clinical phase proteomic methods validate illumination of Drug mechanism of action and toxicity of drug [9 - 13]. In clinical phase explains about the drug response to the treatment. It explains regarding the patient to patient variation. Along with Pharmacogenetic and Pharmacoproteomics, Pharmacoproteomics support to molecular diagnostics for personalised medication [14-16]. Pharmacoproteomics approaches are applied to pharmacology, toxicology and drug development .
Pharmacoproteomics is anticipated to be concerned actively in identification of targets of drug, understanding of mechanism of action, biomarker invention, and difficulty in pharmacokinetics & pharmacodynamics, analysis of drug formulation and delivery systems [18 - 21]. Pharmacoproteomics uses various proteomic strategies in discovery and development of medicines, and represents more regarding each variation in individual patient to drug response than genotyping strategies [19 - 23].
Pharmacoproteomics plays a potential role drug metabolism and drug interactions because proteins are the main effectors of drug action and proteomic analysis constitutes a global approach for the evaluation of alterations in protein response to administration of drug . Biomarkers are naturally occurring genes or molecules which act as major indicators and particular pathological or physiological condition, disease can be identified. The Pharmacoproteomics analysis could be used in each and every pharmaceutical drug industry in every step i.e. target identification and method validation, analyzing the efficacy & toxicity of drugs and examine the mechanism of action of drug .
Pharmacoproteomics methods conducted as, high concentration of an experimental drug has to be given to the patient or test Subject (clinical trials) for over time [23 - 25]. Then the consecutive analysis would be conducted by collecting the blood sample or serum sample. Every dose related response should be analysed thoroughly which correspond to the safety, efficacy and toxicity of drug.
- Mingming Li, Pengcheng Fan, Yu Wang. Lipidomics in Health and Diseases - Beyond the Analysis of Lipids. J GlycomicsLipidomics. 2015; 5: 126.
- Kobayashi E, Satoh N. Clinical Applications of UGT1A1 Polymorphisms for Irinotecan Therapy. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; 3: e117.
- Akkol EK. New Strategies for Anti-Inflammatory Drug Development. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; 3:e118.
- Hong H. Next-Generation Sequencing and Its Impact on Pharmacogenetics. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; 3:e119.
- Roses AD. Post-GWAS: Phylogenetic Analysis in the Hunt for Complex Disease-Associated Loci. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; 3:e120.
- Luisa BM, Eric A, Ann D, Willard D, Dominique E, et al. Challenges Faced in the Integration of Pharmacogenetics/Genomics into Drug Development. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; 3:108.
- 7.Marini F, Brandi ML. Pharmacogenetics of Metabolic Bone Diseases. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; 3:109.
- 8.Bencharit S. History of Progress and Challenges in Structural Biology. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; S4:e001.
- Monte AA, Vasiliou V, Heard KJ. Omics Screening for Pharmaceutical Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Practice. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; S5:001.
- Pham AN, Cao M, Blower PE, Chow MS, Huang Y. Pharmacogenomic Analysis Identifies Increased Efficacy of Oxaliplatin in ABCB1 Overexpressing Tumors. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; 3:110.
- Pandiarajan G, Govindaraj R, Makesh Kumar B, Sankarasivaraman K. Antifertility Activity in the Acetone Extracts of Daturametel, L Seeds on Female Mouse. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; 3: 111.
- Zhan Y, Chen G, Chen Y, Zhao Y. Clinical Application of SIRT1 for Diabetes Therapy. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; 3: e121.
- Ha BH, Boggon TJ. Understanding the Molecular and Functional Mechanisms that Underlie Pharamcogenomics-Based Therapy. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; 3: e122.
- Liu F, Guo L. Toxicogenomics in the Evolution of Toxicology. J Pharmacogenomics Pharmacoproteomics. 2012; 3: e123.
- Tani Y, Tajima T, Kawai A, Unuma Y, Kinoshita H, et al. Evaluation of a Novel Automated Machine, the Auto2D, for Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014; 7:108-111.
- Suganami A, Takase N, Sugiyama H, Virtudazo EV, Kawamoto S, et al. Structure based Functional Distinction between Cln1 and Cln2 Depends on the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014; 7:102-107.
- Hu Q, Guo G, Yang Z, Li Y, Xia Y. Stable Isotope Metabolic Labeling- Based Quantitative Thiol Redox Proteomic Analysis of Hydrogen Peroxide-treated Arabidopsis plant. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014; 7:121-133.
- Biro JC. Suggestion to Upgrade the Canonical Concept of Translation. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014; 7:112-120.
- Che D, Wang H, Fazekas J, Chen B. An Accurate Genomic Island Prediction Method for Sequenced Bacterial and Archaeal Genomes. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014; 7:214-221.
- Victor AAR, Abraham S, Chinniah MN, GopalakrishnanMadathiparambil M, Tennyson J. Phylogenetic Characterization and Threading Based-Epitope Mapping of Leptospiral Outer Membrane Lipoprotein LipL41. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014; 7:222-231.
- Khan AU. Beta-lactomics: A New Term Coined in Ã¢ÂÂOMICSÃ¢ÂÂ. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014; 7:e27.
- Thakolwiboon S, Zhu J, Liang Q, Welling TH, Zhang M, et al. Heterogeneity of the CD90+ Population in Different Stages of Hepatocarcinogenesis. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014; 7:296-302.
- Sung HJ, Na SS, Seul KJ, Jeon HS, Park JY, et al. Clinically Applicable Diagnostics Assay Development for Lung Cancer Biomarker, SAA. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014; 7:303-309.
- You FM, Li P, Kumar S, Ragupathy R, Li Z, et al. Genome-wide Identification and Characterization of the Gene Families Controlling Fatty Acid Biosynthesis in Flax (Linumusitatissimum L). J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014; 7:310-326.
- Sriharshan A, Kraemer A, Atkinson MJ, Moertl S, Tapio S. Radiation-Induced Crosstalk between MicroRNAs and Proteins of the Endothelium: In silico Analysis. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014; 7:327-331.