Silent Infections in Livestock: Hidden Threats to Animal and Human Health

Abstract

Introduction

Livestock health is fundamental to food security, rural livelihoods, and global economies. However, not all diseases in animals present with clear clinical signs. Many infections remain “silent,” meaning animals may carry and transmit pathogens without showing obvious symptoms. Such silent infections are particularly concerning because they go undetected, spread easily within herds or flocks, and may even cross into human populations. Recognizing and managing these hidden threats is essential for maintaining animal productivity, protecting public health, and safeguarding trade [1].

Discussion

Silent infections in livestock can be caused by bacteria, viruses, parasites, or prions. Unlike acute diseases with visible symptoms, these infections may remain subclinical for long periods, with carriers acting as reservoirs of disease. Common examples include bovine tuberculosis, brucellosis, foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in certain carriers, and avian influenza in some bird species. In many cases, animals appear healthy, yet continue to shed pathogens into the environment [2].

The consequences of silent infections are significant. At the herd level, they reduce productivity through subtle effects such as lowered fertility, decreased milk yield, or slower weight gain. At the population level, silent infections complicate disease control programs because infected animals often evade detection during routine clinical checks. For instance, brucellosis may persist unnoticed in cattle, spreading infection to other animals and even humans through raw milk or direct contact [3].

From a public health perspective, silent infections represent a zoonotic risk. Diseases like leptospirosis or avian influenza can spill over into humans without early warning, since apparently healthy livestock may serve as a source of infection. The COVID-19 pandemic has further emphasized the importance of surveillance at the human-animal interface to detect pathogens before they escalate into global health emergencies [4].

Silent infections also have major economic implications. International trade regulations require livestock-exporting countries to certify disease-free status. Undetected infections can lead to trade restrictions, economic losses, and erosion of consumer confidence in animal products. For example, unnoticed carriers of foot-and-mouth disease can jeopardize entire export markets [5].

Diagnosis of silent infections relies heavily on laboratory testing, including serology, molecular assays, and advanced imaging where applicable. Regular surveillance programs, quarantine measures, and “test-and-slaughter” policies are essential tools in disease control. Vaccination, where available, plays a critical role in reducing the prevalence of silent infections, though it may sometimes mask infection rather than eliminate it completely.

The “One Health” approach is particularly relevant to managing silent infections. By integrating veterinary, medical, and environmental health disciplines, it becomes possible to monitor livestock more effectively, identify emerging threats early, and reduce risks to human populations. Farmer education, improved biosecurity practices, and government-supported testing programs also remain vital components of disease management.

Conclusion

Silent infections in livestock are a hidden yet serious challenge to animal health, public safety, and economic stability. Their ability to spread unnoticed makes them difficult to control, often leading to long-term consequences for agriculture and human health. Strengthening surveillance, improving diagnostic tools, and adopting a One Health perspective are key strategies for mitigating these risks. By addressing silent infections proactively, the livestock sector can enhance productivity, protect public health, and contribute to sustainable global food systems.

References

1. Ammerman NT. (2007). Introduction: Observing Religious Modern lives. In Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives. Edited by Ammerman, N. T. 3-18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Levitt P. (2008). Religion as a path to civic engagement. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(4), 766-791.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Ammerman NT. (2014). Finding religion in everyday Life. Sociology of Religion, 75(2), 189-207.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Ammerman NT. (2020). Rethinking Religion: Toward a Practice Approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 126(1), 6-51.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Banderker, A. M. (n.d.). Animal Abuse and Welfare in Islam.

   Google Scholar