ISSN: 2321-6204

Reach Us +1-845-458-6882
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Amino Acids, Fatty Acids and Volatile Compounds of Yoghurt Supplemented with Probiotic, Royal Jelly and Pollen Grain

Atallah Abdel-Razek Atallah*

Department of Dairy Science, Benha University, Qaluobia, Egypt

*Corresponding Author:
Atallah AA
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Dairy Science,
Benha University, Qaluobia, Egypt
Tel: +201225922632
E-mail: atallah.mabrouk@fagr.bu.edu.eg

Received Date: 27/02/2018; Accepted Date: 09/04/2018; Published Date: 16/04/2018

Visit for more related articles at Research & Reviews: Journal of Food and Dairy Technology

Abstract

The effect of adding RJ and PG with probiotic strains (Bifidobacterium angulatum, Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus rhamnosus) on the AA; FA and volatile compounds of yoghurt were studied. Addition of RJ and PG increased significantly AA and FA contents of the prepared yoghurt. The yoghurt treatments (T1, T2,T3) were higher (P<0.05) in the content of histidine, isoleucine, lysine, methionine, theronine, valine, arginine, cysteine and proline. Also, the SCFA, MCFA, LCFA, USFA, MUFA and PUFA contents were significantly higher in T1, T2,T3, T4, T5 and T6 than in control sample, except C4:0, it was higher in the control sample. The highest concentrations of acetaldehyde (P<0.05) were obtained in T1 treatment (69.54 μg 100g-1), while, the lowest concentrations of acetaldehyde (P<0.05) were recorded in control sample (40.32 μg 100 g-1).

Keywords

Yoghurt, Probiotic, Amino acids, Fatty acids, Volatile compounds

Abbreviations

RJ: Royal Jelly; PG: Pollen Grain; AA: Amino Acid; FA: Fatty Acid; SCFA: Short-Chain Fatty Acids; MCFA: Medium-Chain Fatty Acids; LCFA: Long-Chain Fatty Acids; USFA: Short-Unsaturated Fatty Acids; MUFA: Mono-Unsaturated Fatty Acids; PUFA: Poly- Unsaturated Fatty acids

Introduction

Yoghurts are produced by milk fermentation with bacterial strains comprising of a blend of Str. thermophilus and Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus. Probiotics are live microorganisms that offer preferences to the host when used in adequate amounts [1]. Most probiotics are microorganisms like those normally found in individuals' guts, particularly in breastfed infants who have characteristic protection against many diseases. The biggest group of probiotic strains in the intestine is lactic acid bacteria, of which Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Probiotics are found to apply other health preferences for example enhancing lactose intolerance, increasing humoral immune responses, biotransformation of isoflavone phytoestrogen to enhance post-menopausal symptoms, bioconversion of bioactive peptides for antihypertension, and decreasing serum cholesterol level [2].

Pollens are the male gametophytes of flowers. Potential utilizations of pollen grain incorporate its utilization in apitherapy and as a functional food. Pollen grains contain of proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, minerals, amino acids and vitamins (A, B, C, D, and E). The therapeutic activity has been ascribed to few phenolic components with antioxidant activity, display in these materials [3].

Another important bee product is royal jelly. The utilization of RJ isn't limited to its high substance in respectable substances, yet in addition to its animating and functional values. Likewise, different kinds of RJ showed antimicrobial activity against sustenance borne pathogenic microorganisms. The chief components of RJ are moisture (65%), protein (12%), carbohydrates (15%), lipids (5%), vitamins and mineral salts.

This work intended to supplement yoghurt with common, dietary, agreeable and accessible bee items (RJ and PG) and probiotic; and to contemplate the impact of including these materials on amino acids and fatty acids, volatile compounds and minerals of produced yoghurt.

Ingredients

Fresh cow and buffalo milks; PG and RJ were gotten from the apiary of the Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Egypt. The RJ was stuffed in misty plastic vials, and kept solidified until utilized.

Strains

Yoghurt cultures comprising of Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Str. thermophilus (1:1) were gotten from Chr. Hansen's Laboratories, Copenhagen, Denmark. Probiotic strains including, Bifidobacterium angulatum DSM 20098, Lactobacillus gasseri ATCC 33323 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus DSM 20245 were gotten from Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center for Nutrition and Food, Kiel, Germany.

Manufacture of Yoghurt

Fresh milk mixture (cow milk and buffalo milk, 1:1) was institutionalized to ~ 3% fat, heated to 85°C for 30 min, instantly cooled to 42°C and divided into seven parts as follows:

• (C) control inoculated with 3% yoghurt starter.

• (T1) milk was supplemented with 0.6% RJ and inoculated with 1.5% yoghurt starter and 1.5% Lb. rhamnosus.

• (T2) the same as T1, but with the use of Lb. gasseri lustead of Lb. rhamnosus.

• (T3) the same as T1, but with the use of Bif. angulatum lustead of Lb. rhamnosus.

• (T4) milk was supplemented with 0.8% PG and inoculated with 1.5% yoghurt starter and 1.5% Lb. rhamnosus.

• (T5) the same as T4, but with the use of Lb. gasseri lustead of Lb. rhamnosus.

• (T6) the same as T4, but with the use of Bif. angulatum lustead of Lb. rhamnosus.

All samples were filled into plastic glasses (80 ml) and incubated at 42°C until the point when the pH came to ~4.6. The samples were cooled and put in a refrigerator at 4 ± 1°C and investigated for its amino acids and fatty acids, volatile compounds and minerals.

Amino Acids

The amino acid of yoghurt samples was resolved as portrayed by Garcia-Amoedo LH et al. [4] utilizing an amino acid analyzer (Technical TSM-1 model DWA 0209 Ireland). The samples were dried to consistent weight, defatted, hydrolyzed and evaporated in a rotary evaporator and in this manner set in a Technician Sequential Multisampling amino acid analyzer (TSM).

Fatty Acids

The prepared yoghurt samples were taken for investigation of fatty acid substance. Extraction of the fat from the samples was performed utilizing the Rose-Gottlieb method. The fatty acid substance was resolved on a gas chromatograph “Pay-Unicom 304” with a flame-ionization detector and a capillary column ЕСТМ-WAX, 30 m, ID 0.25 mm, Film: 0.25 μm. The extraction of fat was resolved utilizing the modified fatty acid methyl ester method as portrayed by Baydar et al. [5].

Volatile Compounds (VC)

Volatile Compounds were resolved of the prepared yoghurt samples according to Guler et al. [6]. VCs were examined utilizing an Agilent model 6890 gas chromatography (GC) and 5973 N mass selective detector (MS). Columns utilized for FFA separation HP-INNOWAX capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm id × 0.25 μm film thickness). The volatile compounds were isolated under the following conditions: injector temperature 200°C; carrier gas helium at a flow rate of 1.4 ml min–1; oven temperature program initially held at 50°C for 6 min and then programmed from 50°C to 180°C at 8°C min–1 held at 180°C for 5 min. The interface line to MS was set at 250°C. Identification of the compounds was likewise directed by a computer matching. In view of the pinnacle determination, their zones were assessed from the combinations performed on selected ions. The resulting peak areas were communicated in the subjective area units. Evaluation of constituents was figured by outer standard method.

Minerals

Trace elements content had been estimated according to the method by Attalla KM, et al. [7] in Analytical Chemistry of Foods. The dilutions were applied to the atomic absorption spectrophotometer to estimate the levels of investigated elements using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AA-630-02 Shimadzu-Japan).

Statistical Analysis

The statistical examination was completed utilizing measurable program (MSTAT-C 1989) with multi-function utility in regards to the test plan under significance level of 0.05 for the entire outcomes. Different examinations applying LSD were completed [8].

Results and Discussion

Amino Acid Profiles of Produced Yoghurt

The changes in levels of amino acid in yoghurt treatments were measured (Table 1). As can be seen from the table, all the yoghurt samples contained nine basic amino acids in particular histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, theronine, tryptophan and valine while the unimportant amino acids were alanine, arginine, aspartic acid, cystein, glutamic acid, glycine, proline, serine and tyrosine. In both probiotic yoghurt treatments with RJ (T1, T2, T3) and PG (T4, T5, T6), the total amino acids content was higher (P<0.05) contrasted with the C treatment. The probiotic yoghurt containing RJ (T1, T2, T3) were higher (P<0.05) in the histidine, isoleucine, lysine, methionine, theronine, valine, arginine, cysteine and proline contents. While, the control yoghurt was lower in the all amino acids. The three expanded chain amino acid isoleucine, leucine and valine support numerous metabolic procedures extending from the central part as substrates for protein synthesis to metabolic parts as energy substrates [9] antecedents for synthesis of alanine and glutamine and as modulators of muscle protein synthesis [10]. Sulfur amino acids and their metabolites are of major significance in health and infection. Methionine is named nutritiously fundamental. Cysteine is delegated semi fundamental because of the variable limit of body for its creation from methionine [11,12]. Methionine and cysteine substances were higher in T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 treatments contrasted with C sample, with the increase being the biggest (P<0.05) in the T1, T2 and T3, individually. Methionine varied from 1.00 mg 100g-1 in C sample up to 1.6 mg 100g-1 in T1 and T3 samples. The non-essential amino acids had increased (P<0.05) in the T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6, contrasted with C. T1, T2 and T3 samples demonstrated higher (P<0.05) content of arginine, cysteine and proline amino acids than those of yoghurt samples (T4, T5 and T6) or C (Table 1). Proline, glutamic and aspartic acids, lysine and leucine are the transcendent amino acids, constituting roughly 55% of total amino acids in pollen grain [13].

Table 1. Amino acid profiles of probiotic yoghurt with royal jelly (RJ) and pollen grain (PG).

Amino acids Prepared yoghurt
C T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
Essential amino acids (mg 100 g-1)
Histidine 11.00E 11.70A 11.60B 11.70A 11.40C 11.30D 11.40C
Isoleucine 2.90E 3.60B 3.60B 4.00A 3.50C 3.40D 3.40D
Leucine 4.07D 5.20C 5.40B 5.50A 5.40B 5.20C 5.40B
Lysine 2.08F 4.90A 4.80B 4.80B 4.30D 4.20E 4.40C
Methionine 1.00E 1.60A 1.50B 1.60A 1.40C 1.40C 1.30D
Phenylalanine 2.00D 2.40B 2.50A 2.50A 2.30C 2.40B 2.40B
Theronine 14.60G 15.90C 16.00B 16.10A 15.20F 15.40E 15.60D
Tryptophan 1.90D 2.00C 2.10B 2.20A 2.00C 2.00C 2.10B
Valine 4.10F 5.90A 5.70B 5.90A 5.50D 5.40E 5.60C
Non-essential amino acids (mg 100 g-1)
Alanine 5.00C 5.50A 5.40B 5.50A 5.40B 5.40B 5.50A
Arginine 3.00G 4.00C 4.20B 4.50A 3.50F 3.60E 3.70D
Aspartic acid 2.20D 2.50B 2.40C 2.60A 2.40C 2.40C 2.50B
Cystein 0.51D 0.70AB 0.70AB 0.75A 0.61C 0.62C 0.63BC
Glutamic acid 5.00D 6.10C 6.20B 6.40A 6.10C 6.10C 6.20B
Glycine 4.50F 6.50D 6.80A 6.70B 6.60C 6.60C 6.40E
Proline 16.40F 18.20B 18.40A 18.40A 17.90E 18.10C 18.00D
Serine 3.80E 4.90A 4.70C 4.80B 4.60D 4.70C 4.70C
Tyrosine 4.00B 5.00A 4.90A 4.90A 4.80A 4.90A 4.90A

Fatty Acid Profiles of Produced Yoghurt

Data on the FA contents of produced yoghurt are displayed in Table 2. A sum of 15 fatty acids were identified, involved both saturated (SFA) and unsaturated fatty acids (USFA). The level of oleic acid (C18:1) in produced yoghurt were the most elevated among every single fatty acids. In yoghurts, SFA was the predominant fatty acid and includes capric acid, C10:0; palmitic acid, C16:0 and stearic acid, C18:0. The proportion of LCFA in produced yoghurts was the highest, followed MUFA, MCFA and PUFA. The proportion of different groups of fatty acids in T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 samples were consistently higher (P<0.05) than that in C, except C4:0 it was higher in the C sample. The principal LCFA in all yoghurt was palmitic acid (C16:0), MCFA was lauric acid (C12:0), and SCFA was capric acid (C10:0), and MUFA was oleic acid (C18:1), and PUFA was linoleic acid (C18:2). The fatty acids of T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 treatments were high in USFA. This finding is like other investigated conventional Greek yogurt, that the dominating SFA in the sample were myristic acid (C14:0), palmitic acid (C16:0), and stearic acid (C18:0), while the predominant MUFA was oleic acid (C18:1) [6]. Unsaturated fatty acids assume an imperative part in human nutrition and health, adds to cholesterol lowering and thus coronary illness chance diminishment by increasing the high density lipoprotein (HDL) in blood [14].

Table 2. Fatty acid profiles (mg 100 g-1) of probiotic yoghurt with RJ and PG.

Fatty acids   Prepared yoghurt
C T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
C4:0 SCFA 5.70A 5.50C 5.60B 5.50C 5.40D 5.40D 5.50C
C6:0 SCFA 5.90C 6.20A 6.10B 6.10B 6.10B 6.10B 6.20A
C8:0 SCFA 5.10E 6.00A 5.90B 5.90B 5.30C 5.20D 5.30C
C10:0 SCFA 9.20D 10.10B 10.20A 10.20A 10.10B 9.90C 10.10B
C12:0 MCFA 6.10E 6.70A 6.50C 6.60B 6.40D 6.50C 6.60B
C14:0 MCFA 3.10D 3.40A 3.30B 3.30B 3.20C 3.20C 3.30B
C16:0 LCFA 11.50D 12.40A 12.30B 12.30B 12.30B 12.20C 12.30B
C17:0 LCFA 3.10D 3.90A 3.70C 3.80B 3.70C 3.80B 3.80B
C18:0 LCFA 10.40E 11.00D 11.40A 11.20B 11.00D 11.10C 11.00D
C10:1 SUFA 2.10D 2.20C 2.40A 2.40A 2.20C 2.30B 2.40A
C12:1 MUFA 0.70CD 0.71BC 0.75A 0.74A 0.69D 0.75A 0.72B
C14:1 MUFA 1.90D 2.60B 2.70A 2.60B 2.50C 2.70A 2.60B
C16:1 MUFA 2.00D 2.60B 2.50C 2.70A 2.50C 2.60B 2.60B
C18:1 MUFA 15.50E 16.30A 16.20B 16.20B 16.00D 16.10C 16.10C
C18:2 PUFA 4.00E 4.80A 4.60C 4.70B 4.50D 4.60C 4.50D
C18:3 PUFA 1.60D 2.00B 2.10A 2.00B 2.00B 2.00B 1.90C
C20:4 PUFA 0.17C 0.20B 0.22A 0.21AB 0.20B 0.21AB 0.20B

The contents of most vital fatty acids -C18:1, C18:2, C18:3 and C20:4- were significantly (P<0.05) higher in T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 than in C. The SCFA contents (from C4:0 to C10:0) in T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 were higher (P<0.05) when contrasted with C sample (Table 2). The content of C4:0 in C sample was higher (P<0.05) contrasted with different treatments. The amount of MCFA (from C12:0 to C14:0) decreased (P<0.05) in C, contrasted with different treatments. Yet, the amount of MCFA and LCFA increased (P<0.05) in T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6, contrasted with C, demonstrated that, the lipids of Honey bee dust in the concentrate comprise for the most part of: linolenic, palmitic, linoleic and oleic acids from GC investigation. Unsaturated fats constitute all things considered around 70% of the aggregate [15].

Volatile Compounds Profiles of Produced Yoghurt

The volatile compounds found in yogurt samples are showed in Table 3. There were significant differences (P<0.05) in acetaldehyde concentration of prepared yoghurts. The highest concentrations of acetaldehyde (P<0.05) were obtained in T1 treatment (69.54 μg 100 g-1), while, the lowest concentrations of acetaldehyde (P<0.05) were recorded in C treatment (40.32 μg 100 g-1). Ketones are normal constituents of produced yoghurt as other volatile compounds. Despite the fact that diketone diacetyl (2, 3 butanedione) was varied (P<0.05), it was distinguished in yoghurt treatments. The maximum content of diacetyl was recorded in T1 treatment followed by T2 and T3 treatments. The other volatile compound such as ethanol was not detected in all yoghurt samples demonstrated that diketones in yoghurt come just from pyruvate, since thermophilic starter cultures can process citrate. There were non-significant differences (P>0.05) in acetoin and acetone concentration in yoghurt samples [16]. This methyl ketone is gotten from β-oxidation of saturated free fatty acids relying upon the lipolytic action of yoghurt bacteria found that these ketones expanded in yoghurts relying upon the increase in content of fat and storage period [17,18].

Table 3. Volatile compounds of concentrations (μg 100g-1) of probiotic yoghurt with RJ and PG.

Volatiles Yoghurt samples
C T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
Acetaldehyde 40.32E 69.54A 58.91B 55.22C 50.21D 50.34D 50.33D
Diacetyl 4.56C 9.32A 7.36A 5.68B 4.55C 4.41C 4.60C
Acetoin 5.28A 5.34 A 5.41 A 5.31A 5.32A 5.44A 5.36A
Acetone 3.20A 3.32A 3.28A 3.40A 3.34A 3.31A 3.32A

Minerals Content of Produced Yoghurt

The impact of RJ, PG and probiotic bacteria on the mineral of prepared yoghurt samples is shown in Table 4. Expansion of RJ treatments (T1, T2 and T3) and PG treatments (T4, T5 and T6) to yoghurt prompts an increase in its minerals content (P<0.05). Calcium was high concentration (between 11.98 to 13.11 mg 100 g-1), while Mn was low concentration f (between 0.02 to 0.11 mg 100 g-1) of yoghurt samples. These results agree with those reported by Stocker et al. who identified different trace and mineral components in royal jelly that could be ascribed to an outside factor, for example, environment; different botanical and geological origins and to some degree inside variables, for example, biological factors related to the bees [4].

Table 4. Minerals contents of probiotic yoghurt with RJ and PG (mg 100g-1).

Mineral content Yoghurt samples
C T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
Ca 11.98B 13.03A 13.00A 13.01A 13.05A 13.04A 13.02A
P 5.65B 6.21A 6.21A 6.31A 6.12A 6.20A 6.17A
Na 10.20B 11.45A 11.51A 11.50A 11.43A 11.51A 11.45A
K 5.90B 7.10A 7.04A 7.00A 7.01A 7.10A 6.99A
Fe 0.10B 0.34A 0.36A 0.32A 0.33A 0.35A 0.35A
Mg 0.35B 0.51A 0.50A 0.53A 0.50A 0.52A 0.53A
Mn 0.02B 0.11A 0.11A 0.12A 0.10A 0.11A 0.11A
Zn 0.09B 0.14A 0.13A 0.14A 0.13 A 0.14A 0.13A

Conclusion

Yoghurt made using probiotic, RJ and PG with a decent nutritional quality. The AA and FA contents were significantly different (P<0.05) between the yoghurt T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 than in C sample. Addition of RJ and PG increased significantly AA and FA contents of the prepared yoghurt. Also, the SCFA, MCFA, LCFA, SUFA, MUFA and PUFA contents were significantly higher in the yoghurts (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6) than in C sample, except C4:0, it was higher in C sample. Calcium was the high concentration element, while, Mn was the low concentration of produced yoghurt treatments. Finally the treatments contain RJ, PG and probiotic was chosen as the most attractive treatments as far as AA and FA, and was suggested for the preparation of high quality yoghurt, it's supplemented with characteristic, dietary, acceptable and accessible honey bee products and probiotic strains.

Significance Statements

The yoghurt made using probiotic, RJ and PG with a decent dietary quality. The AA and FA contents were significantly different (P<0.05) between the yoghurt containing RJ (T1, T2, T3) and PG (T4, T5, T6) than in C sample. Addition of RJ and PG increased significantly AA and FA contents of the prepared yoghurt.

The yogurt made utilizing probiotic, RJ and PG with a decent dietary quality. The AA and FA substance were essentially extraordinary (P<0.05) between the yogurt containing RJ (T1, T2, T3) and PG (T4, T5, T6) than in C test. Expansion of RJ and PG expanded essentially AA and FA substance of the readied yogurt.

Practical Applications

Recently, yoghurt is a product that is consumed in large quantities and to increase the nutritional and functional value has been supported by the use of some additives, namely probiotics, pollen and royal jelly, because of the characteristic of these materials of therapeutic and functional value of high nutritional value. This work anticipated that would supplement yoghurt with common, healthful, agreeable and accessible honey bee products (RJ and PG) and probiotic; and to contemplate the impact of adding these materials on amino acids and fatty acids, volatile compounds and minerals of prepared yoghurt.

Conflict of Interest

Author has proclaimed that there is no irreconcilable situation.

References